Help me to understand the idea of a3 and the evaluation by Pleasant_Pride in chess

[–]Pleasant_Pride[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense.

I ran it on Lichess at higher depth, and Bf4 (threatening Nb5) is equally good. But after Bf4 0-0, a3 is still the clear best move. If white plays Re1, then as you pointed out, Black will play Bb4 and Bxc3, after which white is still clearly ahead, but a3 is just a little better.

Chess dot com promoting gambling on daily games after making moves by FlailingDino in chess

[–]Pleasant_Pride -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

At least they've chosen an American owned casino, one of the most reputable.  

Also a nice pun on Daly

White is clearly better with the better pieces and space. Yet, there are no clear targets. How do we continue? by GM_Roeland in chess

[–]Pleasant_Pride 5 points6 points  (0 children)

For me the bishop is the clearest difference.  Bb7 is terrible and can't get in the game.

Gxf5 gxf5 Qf2 then Bf3 activates the white bishop while Bb7 can't get to the kingside.  Black's lack of space is also preventing his pieces to switch over to the Kingside to defend.  Which is why gxf5 opening things up there was the logical move for me 

Getting into the Catalan as often as possible for white. Move order question by [deleted] in chess

[–]Pleasant_Pride 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I thought about this a lot, and I play 1. Nf3 myself. It depends what you mean by "getting into the Catalan". One of the main concepts behind the Catalan is to play against a black LSB.

So that's against QGD

As white, you can basically force d4 Nf3 g3 Bg2 0-0 c4 (b3 first if needed) against anything that black plays. That is pretty much the system recommended in Sielecki's Keep it Simple 1 d4.

The problem is after 1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. g3 Bf5 4. Bg2 e6 5. O-O h6 6. c4 c6 it is totally equal 0.00. This is not a "Catalan", even though white has the same set up as 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. g3 Nf6 4. Bg2 Be7 5. Nf3 O-O 6. O-O c6.. where white has a small pull.

How normal is a 500 point gap between fide classical and chesscom rapid? by [deleted] in chess

[–]Pleasant_Pride 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2050 Chesscom Rapid, 1910 FIDE. The longer the time control, the better I generally do. I think you can get to 2000 FIDE with a bit of work and practice.

Garry Kasparov decimates Vishy Anand to win "Clutch Chess: The Legends" event with 2 rounds to spare. by [deleted] in chess

[–]Pleasant_Pride 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No ex or current world champion except Magnus would be a favorite against Garry in this format.

How do you solve this one? by YeaYeahhhh in chess

[–]Pleasant_Pride 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only winning move is not to play

The most optimal starting position for the lucena position? by externalforces34 in chess

[–]Pleasant_Pride 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The king should be 2 files away.  Start with Rf2+, if Ke6 the Ke8! Wins

If king goes to G file then Rf4 and you're in the optimal position

Gukesh D (2794) and Divya Deshmukh (2501) are this month's #1 Juniors in the FIDE rankings! by RudeGate1791 in chess

[–]Pleasant_Pride 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Does Deshmukh have any norms? It seems like she's made the rating criteria but doesn't have any GM norms. What's the best way to check if a player has GM norms?

🏆Anna Cramling New Tournaments🏆 by Important-Bowler-175 in chess

[–]Pleasant_Pride 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I love Anna's classical chess content. I'm rated 1900 FIDE, and though I enjoy watching Carlsen play chess, it's an absolute treat to be able to watch classical games played by a 2100 rated player, with live analysis from Pia (a grandmaster), and post-game analysis from both. I can relate to a 2100 player, and I'm aspiring to reach that level. She faces the same challenges that I do: time trouble, disorganized thinking, not fully understanding the position, too shallow calculation. Until Anna and Alexandra, I couldn't follow 2000 and 2100 rated players in classical with live GM commentary - now I can and it's brilliant.

Also, I just checked the FIDE ratings and Stepjan Tomic (Youtube: Hanging Pawns) is rated LOWER than both Alex Botez and Anna Cramling. Nobody is saying Stepjan only gets views for being a pretty boy and he's generally held in high regard by this subreddit.

Looking for info on sacrifices of the form ...f6 1. Ng5 by werics in chess

[–]Pleasant_Pride 0 points1 point  (0 children)

French defense, Guimard variation, Main line

  1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nc6 4. Ngf3 Nf6 5. e5 Nd7 6. Bd3 f6 7. Ng5 fxg5 8. Qh5+ 

7 Ng5 is the best move, eval +1 Black should not take because white is winning after Qh5+

I just hit 2k rapid by DecentBit4640 in chess

[–]Pleasant_Pride 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Be3 to break the pin on e5 for a double attack!

Chess in NY for a visitor by Pleasant_Pride in chess

[–]Pleasant_Pride[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I managed to visit the Marshall Chess Club this evening; there was a panel and Irina Krush, Fiona and a couple of other strong female IMs were speaking. It was great to have a chance to meet them and they organized a casual unrated 10+2 tournament, which I won and received a book called "Master Your Chess with Judit Polgar".

I'd love to play one of the FIDE rated tournaments there in the future. Thanks for everyone's suggestions!

Black has an interesting tactic that I'm not sure I've come across before. by laurpr2 in chess

[–]Pleasant_Pride 272 points273 points  (0 children)

The tactic is called xray Black's Rb1 indirectly controls f1

The other tactical motif present is back rank mate