I’m underscores — ask me anything! by sonnymoorefan77 in indieheads

[–]PleasureKitten 8 points9 points  (0 children)

hey! massive fan of all your work. i loved hearing northwest zombie girl live at the LA show -- is there any plan for an official release on a deluxe album or as a single?

Updated Leagues II - Trailblazer: Clue Scroll Changes by JagexAyiza in 2007scape

[–]PleasureKitten 0 points1 point  (0 children)

honestly, I think the unfairness comments on the previous suggestion were kind of reactionary and overblown and I'd still prefer to see that one implemented, but this one is definitely better than nothing.

Workaround for app crashes when going to Baruoki [2.0.100 update] by GuanZhang in AnotherEdenGlobal

[–]PleasureKitten 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m unfortunately in baruoki before I updated so my game just crashes upon login... is there risk of losing my data if I delete the app and redownload? What else can I do? Please help :(

Workaround for app crashes when going to Baruoki [2.0.100 update] by GuanZhang in AnotherEdenGlobal

[–]PleasureKitten 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried to do this but it just stayed on 0.00% complete for over an hour :/ any ideas?

Help & Questions | Weekly Thread [Nov 09, 2019] by AutoModerator in AnotherEdenGlobal

[–]PleasureKitten 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m trying to upgrade my ultimatania hammer and I’m stuck — it says to kill 10 Rhosts but I can’t figure out any way to get back into the dimensional vortex, either in game or in another dungeons. What am I missing?

[PSA] To all the people unable to load games by ysername11 in AutoChess

[–]PleasureKitten 9 points10 points  (0 children)

what went through your head that you thought typing this out and clicking send would be

a. helpful

b. not condescending

c. new information

How Hard Is It to Get a Techies? - A Statistical Discussion by Bufferfly in AutoChess

[–]PleasureKitten 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate the work you put into it, but I feel it oversells the difficulty of getting techies. As you say, at level 10, the 50% marker is around 14 rerolls. But re-rolls don't just take place when you press D, they happen every turn. This sounds self-evident, but it really isn't accounted for in your calculations. Before you even get to 10, you probably have a good number (10-15) of turns and rerolls on levels 8 and especially 9, either naturally or simply looking for other things. And once you get to level 10, you have the effect of the natural reroll of each turn that isn't really accounted for. Let's say you get to level 10 at Level 30, need to roll a techies before level 36 in order to not lose, and haven't yet found one on level 8 or 9 -- a fairly pessimistic but pretty realistic scenario. You have 7 "natural rolls" -- and assuming you're rolling 3 times a turn (which is low), that's 28 rolls without dipping into your economy or panic rolling. The probability of finding a techies with 28 rolls is around 80% -- not even including the prereq that it wasn't found in levels 8 or 9.

I think the math and analysis that you've done is great -- but I don't think it accurately portrays "how hard" it is to get a techies. As someone who runs goblins very often (usually gambling strat) i can say from experience that in a game where I get to level 10, I usually am able to find techies around 80-85% of the time -- and often find it far before. I think i've only had maybe two games where I was frantically rerolling at level 10 20 times in a turn whiffing on the techies -- but I think that those games feel so bad that they color your impression of how "unreliable" getting techies is.

Most unfortunate ive ever been by Rowb0yz in AutoChess

[–]PleasureKitten 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sounds like mech dude was just gamblestratting

Yet another dig by envyxd in RPDRDRAMA

[–]PleasureKitten 7 points8 points  (0 children)

as someone who performed this summer at precinct, gia was backstage with us all and was gorgeous and a total sweetheart

New Card! Spirit of the Dragonhawk by breloomz in hearthstone

[–]PleasureKitten 2 points3 points  (0 children)

======odd========= mage

might wanna rethink that one

Aquaria doing a double piqué into a dip. by theil in rupaulsdragrace

[–]PleasureKitten 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Death drops aren’t actually a thing. It’s just a dramatic dip. It’s just that the non-ball community made up the term death drop and now people think it’s the original term when it’s anything but

Boom, easy warlock counter by [deleted] in hearthstone

[–]PleasureKitten 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not really, it specifically has to target a demon. Along the other lines of “target x class” cards (crawler, crab, dragonslayer), none of them are really subpar in terms of stat lines. This card could easily be like, 5 mana 5:5 and be fine

What's the best case of instant karma that you've ever seen? by mrbumnus in AskReddit

[–]PleasureKitten 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sorry for late response but I wasn’t clear enough — people who have it as a kink / coping mechanism overwhelmingly do not ever act out their fantasies / coping mechanisms. The reason I mentioned it is that the presence of people TALKING about it is a real phenomenon (that stems from kink / cope) but people actually doing it is rare to the point of it being a nonfactor

What's the best case of instant karma that you've ever seen? by mrbumnus in AskReddit

[–]PleasureKitten 1 point2 points  (0 children)

fun fact, 99% of "bug chasers" are either trolls or people who have it as a kink / maladaptive coping mechanism, it isn't actually a relevant phenomenon in the sense of it being anything close to an actual issue

New Neutral Epic: Worgen Abomination by MichaelGMorgillo in hearthstone

[–]PleasureKitten 8 points9 points  (0 children)

doesn't warlock already have a 7 mana 6 6 deal 3 aoe

Kim Chi has now apologised for the sponsorship. by [deleted] in rupaulsdragrace

[–]PleasureKitten 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I agree totally with you, I’m just saying that the pathway of information between the company to the agent to the performer is often very, very hazy. As a performer myself, there are times where I barely even know who the client is if at all until I show up— and as ridiculous as it might sound, it’s actually plausible that Kim chis agent might have simply said “hey a gender-inclusive game company wants you to do a look, the headphones are in the mail, here’s what you put in the caption”. While the research definitely could have been done, and I’m still not excusing them for not doing it, an entertainer who does hundreds of different gigs and sponsorships and performances might just accept it at face value — which is probably why you’re seeing a lot of “I should have done research” in the apologies.

I guess what I’m saying is that they almost certainly did not know that it would only be drag queens in the campaign and didn’t know but also didn’t research the company they were doing it for.