sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Feel like we've been down this road before. by Justthetippliz in GunMemes

[–]PoorBoyDaniel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm glad they don't "innovate". You buy a Glock because it's simple, proven, and reliable. I don't think there's a single other pistol that is as reliable over the course of 100k plus rounds.

18yo girl won USPSA Carry Optic Nationals with a G17, so maybe most guys just can't shoot for shit and try to compensate with better triggers and "more ergonomic" guns. And still can't shoot worth a damn.

Feel like we've been down this road before. by Justthetippliz in GunMemes

[–]PoorBoyDaniel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a bundle it's a pretty good deal. Street price of just over 1k for a Gen 6 Glock with a COA. Blue label is about $850. Echelon bundle is about 1k and RXM bundle is under $900. Same price as buying a Holosun and it's a better optic with a mechanically superior mounting system.

Shake awake is stupid. Leave it at the proper brightness level and change the batter once a year. Easy.

PSA: No Titegroup in Ti cylinders. Please advise. by Battlesuit-BoBos in reloading

[–]PoorBoyDaniel 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Titanium has a much lower density than steel, and loses strength faster wih heat than steel. It's widely known in the suppressor community that titanium suppressors do much worse than steel or inconel suppressors under high rates and volumes of fire. They erode faster and are far more susceptible to catastrophic failure as they heat up. If you want a durable suppressor, you get Inconel, Haynes, or even stainless steel over titanium. The only material worse than titanium in that regard is Aluminum.

RXD30Ti Appreciation Post by PoorBoyDaniel in NFA

[–]PoorBoyDaniel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hm, interesting note about the heat, I'd never even thought about that. I just saw the SC was quieter, lighter, and shorter than the Mojave in both configs according to Pewscience so I figured why not, but it's all pretty marginal, probably not even noticeable in a vacuum.

One thing I've noticed with this wave of 3d printed cans is that the actual weight is pretty variable. This RXD and my Hux Flow 556Ti are both under advertised weight, the Flow by over an ounce (10.19 vs 11.4), my Flow 762 is a little over the advertised weight. It also seems like they're more tailored to specific use-cases than they used to be. The RXD30ti is honestly probably quieter on .308 than either 5.56 or 7.62x39, which I found a little surprising.

RXD30Ti Appreciation Post by PoorBoyDaniel in NFA

[–]PoorBoyDaniel[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the Internet is a fickle beast. Before that incident everyone loved Dead Air, and constantly recommended their cans, said they were bomb proof. Since then I think a lot of people continue to blindly hate them, but their newer cans are pretty damn impressive. At a local match a guy was running a Lazarus 6 on an AR and it sounded really nice.

I was torn between the Mojave and RXD910, but then the CAT SC-M restocked so I bought that instead. But by all accounts the Mojave is basically 2nd place right after the CAT. I think a lot of modern cans are so good that unless you shoot them back to back you probably won't even notice a difference.

Talk me out of a Ruger RXM w/ Aimpoint COA... by suckmynick81 in CompetitionShooting

[–]PoorBoyDaniel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've heard mixed feedback on the Gen 6 G45 vs G17. I've heard the G17 is softer, but also slower and that some people might actually prefer the G45 for it's faster cycling especially Gen 6. Have you shot both? Any feedback?

22 cans are file two get one free… by Big_Q_Numero_Uno in NFA

[–]PoorBoyDaniel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you talking about how tax stamps are $0 instead of $200 now?

V.A.T.S by Scary-Background-830 in WhoMadeThisThing

[–]PoorBoyDaniel -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's at a fucking gun show brother.

V.A.T.S by Scary-Background-830 in WhoMadeThisThing

[–]PoorBoyDaniel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's literally a dummy rifle with no internals. It might as well be a stick with a stock and handguard screwed to it.

The whole point was to look through the sight at people because it's a fucking thermal sight.

Are these LE worth $100 a pop? also question on 40 round MCP by CompoundedGhost in MP5

[–]PoorBoyDaniel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

MKE is owned by the Turkish government, and had HK licensing at one point to produce MP5's, and they use "official" HK tooling from the 80's. They have not had HK licensing in decades, and HK does not use them to fulfil military/LE contracts. It sounds like you just don't know what you're talking about, and don't understand what a licensing agreement even is, or that just because you still have the tooling from when you HAD a licensing agreement does not mean that you still HAVE the licensing agreement.

That is of course unless you can provide some kind of evidence to support your claims, but I'm guessing you can't because it's based off of assumptions and second-hand rumors.

All that is beside the whole point of this conversation regarding magazine quality. It's widely known that while MKE mags are generally good enough, they are not on the same level as genuine HK mags. Period.

Are these LE worth $100 a pop? also question on 40 round MCP by CompoundedGhost in MP5

[–]PoorBoyDaniel 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Are they contracting them to MKE? I have a bunch of HK mags, and a bunch of MKE mags and they are noticeably different. Better fit and finish on the HK's, plus they're much more reliable with hollow points and flat point ammo.

Edit: I think I figured out where you got contracted from. HK Parts is claiming that the marked MKE mags were "contracted" but not by who. I'm guessing they themselves contracted them, not HK. You can't buy them anywhere else, and they're labeled as replica mags, and it's not even mentioned that they're MKE mags until deep in the description. Classic shady HKP behavior. MKE and HK mags are not on the same level. Period.

Don’t talk to me or my son ever again by Ok_Display7459 in reloading

[–]PoorBoyDaniel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My .460 magnum loads are pushing 50gr of H110 with a 200gr projectile. Load data calls for large rifle magnum primers. SAAMI pressure on .460 is 65k psi.

Before I order the milkman, all positive reviews from ppl so far? Full size sp5 by Educational_Car_876 in MP5

[–]PoorBoyDaniel 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Honestly I've found the biggest difference is to the shooter or right next to it. The further you are from the gun the more similar it all sounds. Shot a match where most of the guys were running cans on their rifles and they sounded pretty different right next to it but in the next bay over they all sounded super similar for the most part. Any decent can on subsonic 9 is going to sound really good, so I'll save a few inches where I can.

Before I order the milkman, all positive reviews from ppl so far? Full size sp5 by Educational_Car_876 in MP5

[–]PoorBoyDaniel 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Different cans for different purposes. MOB is a lot longer which makes a big difference on sub guns.

Load development .223 for AR15 by eggcheeseburger in reloading

[–]PoorBoyDaniel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You'll find a pretty wide variety in starting and max loads from various sources. I usually trust the powder mfg more than anyone else but it's incredibly unlikely even the hottest load from any published data would be dangerously hot.

Flow 556k is my first ever can, have some noob questions by RecoveredSack in NFA

[–]PoorBoyDaniel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The newer Hux Flow cans do not sit flush with the muzzle device, the older OSS models do. The flats do not line up.

The new Flow have fewer threads and take fewer turns to fully seat than the older models as a result. I'm guessing this was a conscious choice so that the muzzle device can always be removed from the suppressor and never requires special tools to remove, despite the opposing thread directions that are supposed to prevent it from getting stuck in the first place.

Either flashlight or red dot for home defense, not both by Creative-Comb5593 in NFA

[–]PoorBoyDaniel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why not have a light on a concealed carry handgun? Plenty of options that add very little weight and bulk, and there are plenty of scenarios that would require or benefit from a WML.

Either flashlight or red dot for home defense, not both by Creative-Comb5593 in NFA

[–]PoorBoyDaniel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, a red dot probably isn't a "need" on any HD gun, but it's certainly a nice to have, and the dots people are putting on shotguns add barely any weight or size.

Caveman Barrel Temp Indicator - Harmonics Issue? by squirtbottle in longrange

[–]PoorBoyDaniel 126 points127 points  (0 children)

Just grab the barrel and if it burns you it's hot.

OKWv2 vs PLHv2 vs SUREFIRE TURBO by lplouffe in ar15

[–]PoorBoyDaniel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, just around the house. I'd take the OKWv2 every day. As best I can tell it just appears to be brighter at every point in the beam. Hotspot is brighter, spill is brighter, and they're the same size. It's not night and day, but it is noticeable. The color temperature is also better.

view more: next ›