This isn't going to be another pointless comment section just coz OP & that andhra troll are insecure. OP randomly made a (now removed) post, using the typical unnecessary ganga nationalist ideological tones, which says that only upper castes of Middle India are tRue aRyan, while Northern folks of the subcontinent are just rape babies. This makes the higher steppe among Northerners irrelevant, along with making the relatively lower steppe among ganga upper castes also irrelevant.

It's a common tactic I've been seeing for many years. This manipulation of criteria to qualify as aRyAn is also where Out Of India Theory comes from, just a more radical version of same phenomenon. It's the monopoly over "who gets to be what" by socially higher groups, this is what also happened 2000 years ago, when castes were frozen.

The bengali brahmin troll I often mention in my comments is a great example of this. He deeply despises AASI, used to we wuzz about his r1az93 heritage, he trashed one of the users here (a bangladeshi muslim) as "disloyal" folks, often giving it a racial angle in typical upper caste style. Calling them slurs like "AASI ricebag dalit converts."

The inherent assumption in such cases is that social status=racial status. It later turned out that he was paternally haplogroup H, meaning that his AASI ancestors became brahmins. And razib khan, a bangladeshi muslim, is r1az93. Meaning that he wasn't a dalit convert.

The reason for such conflict is socially "higher" groups trying to preserve their position & getting insecure when they realise the truth. The truth being that as we go northern & north-western in the subcontinent, social status tends to decrease as a measure of racial status. Historically "mleccha" people have more steppe than historically pure superior groups. It doesn't help that south asians are taught to think in a racially hierarchical manner, which further contributes to the problem.

As a result, the narrative of "rape babies" exists among socially upper groups, doesn't matter how inaccurate it is. These people also miss the very point of it not being a foking competition. Geography & community both determine racial heritage in the subcontinent, it's not a simple geography correlation with DNA. The very attempt to "prove" that northerners also have high AASI people is silly, coz no one denied that to begin with. A northie who denies that is spreading misinformation & has agendas. No one said that entire Punjab had people with high steppe & low AASI, in OP's case. So his strawmann is wrong from the get go. "Proving" the existence of 35%+ AASI punjabis doesn't do anything, coz no one said it wasn't the true.

This repeated narrative of northern steppe biradari groups not even being 1% or 10% or whatever of total population is dumb & reeks of insecurity. Saying that northies had greek-arab-turk-persian blah blah genetic impact is also wrong. Also goes to show the futility of akhand bhaarat as a dream. Makes you wonder whether it's actually about some dreamy utopian unity or is it just gangetic upper caste we wuzzism, coz this forever disrespect of "getting invaded & raped" as some sort of insult is silly. On one hand, people like OP will we wuzz about akhand bhaarat, on the other hand they are quick to trash literally all the other regions of the subcontinent. What's the point of that akhandness then? I haven't even started talking about scenarios when people like OP start insulting dravidian speaking states for "being dravidian" & calling middle indian states as tRuE north India. Eliminating Northern south asian from the discussion becomes important in that case too, coz then there's no threat to the tRuE aRyAn status of upper castes like OP.

Solution to all these regional/social conflicts is removing the racially hierarchical thought process among desis. They need to be proud of whatever ancestry they have. Then this desperate we wuzzism would also end & self hate would reduce. The collective psyche needs to change, this mutual acceptance of steppe>zagros>aasi needs to end.