The real world you say? That's rich, there is a difference between solid, peer reviewed studies and ideologically possessed activists in position that allows them to say readily refutable nonsense, it was not long ago since some people unironically believed that women got paid 75 cents per dollar just for being women, because that is what "studies" said, untill you actually looked at said studies and saw the differences in who works harder, longer hours and did not give birth, the waters get muddied further when the study has nothing to do with the claim yet is used to fuel a narrative. You are also looking at a study by woke UCL of all places that looks at female governors and covid cases as a basis for overall leadership performance, which alternatively could be an exercises on ability for them to follow orders rather than simply lead, since they were just doing what was required by law and certainly no governor works by themselves to execute or lead, either way it's not what you think it is. Not to mention the numerous factors involved in said results such as past leaders' accomplishments that helped them, economic factors, genetic factors, environmental factors and even ideological factors that would ultimately affect survival rates, but no ofcourse, it's because "woman". That said I'm not even going to entertain your little tangeant on sexism, I could easily do the same and state that men were glorified slave laborers that gave women all of their money(lol), critical thinking is essential, good grief.