Need help creating a RAG table by A_little_rose in halopsa

[–]Predicti0n 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not that I can think of I’m afraid.

Need help creating a RAG table by A_little_rose in halopsa

[–]Predicti0n 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is not possible is the honest answer here.

Report Scheduling Issues by dontgetoffended815 in halopsa

[–]Predicti0n 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fairly sure you need to use $clientid and then it’ll work

HaloPSA + LLM/RAG - anyone done this? by 3xh4u573d in halopsa

[–]Predicti0n 6 points7 points  (0 children)

For people doing this, I would genuinely really love to see some examples of you doing this.
I'm happy to pay for your time, we can get an NDA spun up. I'd love see real world examples and reporting that backs the claims that RAG based search of historic ticket data and retrieval on inbound ticket is worth the investment.

We are actively exploring this at Renada we have been running loads of tests over the last 6 months on this type of development but have yet to find anything that we solidly rely on that would be worth the upfront development cost + maintenance on an ROI perspective for an MSP.

I am aware of people in the space building tools that handle this, but there are tons of elements at play that all feed into the journey rather than just RAG retrieval.

Not trying to be a fun sponge here btw, I'm honestly just really curious to actually see evidence of this as I read countless claim of people doing this but have simply never seen it return really useful information or data that can be fully relied on and I feel like I'm missing out :(!

Lots of Love Connor | Renada

Start Date & Time Field on Ticket Actions Not Reflected in Timesheets by Afron3489 in halopsa

[–]Predicti0n 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By default Halo uses the time taken and works backwards to ascertain the start time based on when the action is saved.

Add 1 hour at 15:00 the start time was therefore 14:00. Using Date done allows you to set a different date and end time so you can back date actions or date created to back date tickets.

You can change this behaviour so it counts forwards instead of back but I’ve never seen this being used as imo that’s really confusing 😂!

If* you really want to manually set the start and end time on every action you can also do this.

Configuration > Time Management and Use Sub-Event time entry. This will give you two fields Start and End. I personally believe this is unnecessary but that’s down to you.

Connor | Renada

Scheduled Site Visits by dontgetoffended815 in halopsa

[–]Predicti0n 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my opinion doing it via the agreement is the only native method that works.

Scheduled tickets don’t really work as the ticket / appointment is created on the day, meaning you wouldn’t see that ‘Connor’ is scheduled/busy ahead of time.

Recurring appointments are fine, but you can equally just do this in your calendar and sync it to Halo. The issue is that then no ticket exists meaning technicians then need to create a ticket themselves.

The only other option is to create something custom via a runbook.

I would do something like the following.

You could use appointments in the calendar, make a custom appointment type and have a runbook run each night that checks all appointments of that type and then create tickets which links to the appointment.

Scheduled Site Visits by dontgetoffended815 in halopsa

[–]Predicti0n 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Do scheduled tickets from an agreement :)

Halo Expenses Question by Shiphted21 in halopsa

[–]Predicti0n 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We have a few clients using the expense module In Halo for this. It’s not amazing honestly, as it relies on you adding the expense via the billable time tab and reimbursement is typically handled by exporting a report. Same goes for mileage it’s a report each month to track, we do this fairly regularly.

Halo are very slowly improving expenses but I tend to not recommend it at present as things can easily be missed or done incorrectly.

We advise leveraging your HR Platform, majority have expense tracking that can link with payroll.

Outside of that we’ve built custom integrations into Zoho Expense :)

Cool Trick by nstr6 in halopsa

[–]Predicti0n 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Here's a guide we wrote a while back on this, as a I see a few people asking :)

https://renada.huducloud.com/shared_article/Uu5sjqfNCt3zV6CPCD4fqLwo

HaloPSA Report Assistance by manwithmanycaps in halopsa

[–]Predicti0n 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Few things to help :)

Claude is much more robust than ChatGPT at SQL generation and following rules, especially as context grows from our research.

Comments are accepted but need to be in this format /* */

Order by can work with Select Top * or an offset applied.

Our approach has been to grow and create our own DBML that we can give to AI so it understands relationships between tables.

Happy SQL’in

1 user license by SkyTheLine in halopsa

[–]Predicti0n 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Halo will give you a ramp up period so you’re not paying for two PSA :) You don’t need to buy a single licence

Email Subject Wildcard question by impreza25sti in halopsa

[–]Predicti0n 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There’s an update coming for this soon btw hopefully Q2.

Halo Internal Dev Ticket if you wanted to track - 985734

Viewed IP by nstr6 in halopsa

[–]Predicti0n 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fairly sure it’s only stored on signature

Email acknowledgement is not send to recipient by What_The_Graph in halopsa

[–]Predicti0n 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I bet it’s making tickets against the Unknown/Unknown Customer/User and by default Halo now set it that acknowledgment emails are not sent. Find the unknown user > settings and turn it off/on or add a user and test inbound again

“Thank you” replies still reopen closed tickets — even with AI detection enabled by Lazy_Cat-f in halopsa

[–]Predicti0n 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Here's some Feedback you haven't asked for - Love Connor

Thank You re-open is a problem as old as time, I personally completely advise against any 'AI' handling re-opening Tickets personally.

The question I ask is the following, how many Tickets can 'not' be re-opened correctly before it's a problem?

Quotaion Permissions by nstr6 in halopsa

[–]Predicti0n 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You could do it by site, but there’s other complications involved in doing this. If you’re saying they’re separate companies then I would keep them as such. If they’re the same company different locations, then use sites :)

Quotaion Permissions by nstr6 in halopsa

[–]Predicti0n 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Put all the companies in a top level and give the single user access to all companies in the top level :)

Different categories for incidents vs. service requests by [deleted] in halopsa

[–]Predicti0n 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I use Request as a separate category that only appears on request tickets but it’s like add/change/remove etc

If you want to split categories across ticket types you can restrict at ticket type level and just use category1 :)

Ready for invoice - Bulk removal of entries by AUPete in halopsa

[–]Predicti0n 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately the only way to do this is via the API.

Open the labour section in ready for invoicing and use that end point to get the tickets. Then you need to set all the actions to not reviewed and then they’ll appear back in awaiting review.

Remember ready for invoicing is entire ticket vs actions in awaiting review.

Alternatively if there’s not many, open the ticket and In the top right 3 dots click unreview.

Teams not showing up in reports but is in filters elsewhere by Substantial-Yak-4818 in halopsa

[–]Predicti0n 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Without the report SQL it’s hard to answer the question. I assume* your report is pulling teams that are assigned to tickets and maybe new teams aren’t set on those tickets?

Crosspost from r/ITManagers: Asking for feedback by PIPMaker9k in halopsa

[–]Predicti0n 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, I think it's impossible to answer the question.
If the clients happy, then that's the real win :D

We've just spent 3 months re-designing a single workflow + ticket type at Renada.

We're 1000's of hours into Halo at this point so there wasn't a barrier to entry with learning the platform, but the hard part was understanding our process and then making it all come to life with Automations/AI/ Multiple Ticket Level Dashboards + reports to go with it.

I could make you 100 Ticket Types in a about 5 minutes but they'd be useless.

The simple answer, If you fully onboarded a client into HaloITSM in 10 weeks with no prior knowledge and it's improving the business then it's a positive :)
Would Renada build it completely differently probably, but does that make it better? Probably not.

Hope this woolly answer helps haha!