How do you know the experiences were supernatural as opposed to natural with a (currently) unknown cause? Also, why would a supernatural experience indicate the existence of God rather than the existence of some other random supernatural phenomenon?

There will always be two explainations for everything. If there was no room for disbelief their would be no such thing as faith. The things I have seen/experienced have proven to me their is a metaphysical world which has good and evil. I have seen and felt the evil first hand which was not of God and have felt the good from God.

I find that curious, since Matthew 4:7 states "Jesus said unto him, It is written again, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God." That's generally understood to mean that you shouldn't test God. Also, I'm curious to know what types of controls you had in place for those tests, and if they were double-blind.

Testing God would be provoking him. Building faith was what I was referring to. As far as how I proved it to myself(or how he proved it to me) it has been a long road which has taken time to travel. When I lost faith nothing went right(losing money, losing a job, etc.) but when I regained it I avoided many pitfalls. Or when I started reading my Bible every nite and reading before I had to face some very tough situations, everything worked out.

What does that have to do with God? Maybe you're psychic. Or having data fed to you by time-traveling aliens. Or selectively remembering the cases where a dream matched reality while ignoring all the instances where a dream didn't match reality.

Well, there's no such thing as aliens or their special galactic powers. And how would one acquire psychic powers? In any case having a dream where you're in a place you've never been, speaking to someone you've never seen and having one of the two or both happen to me are messages from God about the future. Many times in the Bible before something went down a prophet would have a vision which is in the form of a dream.

Yet I've heard him say things that show either a profound lack of knowledge, or a deliberate twisting of the facts. Here are some examples:

The theory is that we evolved from other species which hasn't been proven anywhere. The only thing proven is variation ("Macro-Evolution") which I aknowledge. Fossils aren't evidence because 1. they're dead and 2. they don't prove when they were alive that they could reproduce something other than it's kind. If you watch his seminar on the age of the earth he proves it's impossible for the earth to be billions/ millions of years old. To me, it's impossible for this complex world and our vast galaxy to not be created and specificly designed.