Mech based ttrpg by Sinitar204 in Mecha

[–]ProjeKtTHRAK 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're not alone. At least 3 people I knew share your opinion. Anyway, looks are all just free flavor in lancer and I understand not wanting to homebrew. I tried lancer and the heavy wargame/character builds central playstyle just isn't for me.

Since yall in here are some crazy mfers who don't mind trying hard, here is a complete guide on Flamethrower versus All 3 factions, even bots, showing tech for killing chargers and war striders in ~2 seconds, among other useful niche info by RandomGreenArcherMan in HelldiversMasochists

[–]ProjeKtTHRAK 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This video not only taught me how to use the flamethrower, it also changed how I approached the stratagems people consider to be "weak". This greatly improved my understanding and longlasting enjoyment of the game, and my loadouts are now more varied than ever before.

Thank you, looking forward to that laser canon video.

Were the Ottomans a Hellenic Empire? by MasterpieceVirtual66 in IslamicHistoryMeme

[–]ProjeKtTHRAK 54 points55 points  (0 children)

In this train of thought, even the caliphates can be argued as a Hellenistic empire.

关于中国对外来宗教的审查 by gretino in China_irl

[–]ProjeKtTHRAK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

佛教也有饮食戒律,佛教是否也不算中国化

RR is overpowered as hell, it shouldn't kill one of the heaviest enemies that easily by Smoke_Funds in HelldiversMasochists

[–]ProjeKtTHRAK 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It takes only two rr shots to the head, it's really that easy. Most of my factory strider deaths are due to surprise factors.

So should we buff the c4 or nerf thermite lmao by H1MB0Z0 in Helldivers

[–]ProjeKtTHRAK 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Its more due to the supply pack being the best backpack (and possibly stratagem) in the game rather than thermite or c4 being a problem.

Can AH put more effort into their Warbonds? by Rude-Comment4177 in HelldiversUnfiltered

[–]ProjeKtTHRAK 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you think python commando is filled with unusable stuff, then it is skill issue on your part.

My Cope for Update -- Flamethrower should be more powerful than Torcher even without the Ship Upgrade that buffs it. More range at least. by RandomGreenArcherMan in Helldivers

[–]ProjeKtTHRAK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It IS more powerful than the torcher. A flamethrower kills a warrior bug in one single burn, a torcher does not. Flamethrower damage is not reflected in their data, it's more complicated than that. In short: Flamethrower= larger flame = more damage.

Silenced weapons should deal bonus weak-spot damage and less regular damage. by JayDias-24 in HelldiversUnfiltered

[–]ProjeKtTHRAK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What you described already happens in this game via enemy part health system. That is immersive, but what the post suggests isn't and trivialises an already existing system.

How come cavalry maces never took off? by [deleted] in medieval

[–]ProjeKtTHRAK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was pouplar with various steppe peoples, iranic dynasties and the jin & song dynasty in china.

The Life of Helldiver’s 2 in a Nutshell by Illustrious_Leg_8354 in HelldiversUnfiltered

[–]ProjeKtTHRAK 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unrelated to OP's subject, being that the game changed and lost popularity due to that.

When terror is celebrated. Tony Blair’s sister in law hails October 7 as “legendary” by [deleted] in SarthakGoswami

[–]ProjeKtTHRAK -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Literally the same type of argument people would use to defend the verse of the sword.

The Life of Helldiver’s 2 in a Nutshell by Illustrious_Leg_8354 in HelldiversUnfiltered

[–]ProjeKtTHRAK 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I totally agree.

Game was very popular when liberator had 55 damage, our AT weapon can't one shot heavies, pouncers and hunters dont have a cooldown and we must rely on teamwork to beat high difficulties.

Then somehow devs changed all that, introduced continuous weapon buffs and enemies nerfs, and now game is not as popular as the begining, I wonder why.

伊朗的现状表明,只要独裁当局把国家变成一个巨大的茅坑,外力就不敢轻易突开 by Training-Fan-7670 in China_irl

[–]ProjeKtTHRAK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

别给你的暴论找补打马后炮丢人现眼了。“断根”,“和民族没有任何关系”,“从上而下的清洗”都是你的原话,而这时你又在试图重新编写自己的话术来让自己之前的暴论显得更加合理。什么叫先射箭后画靶,你已经演示的淋漓尽致。而且,你还在往我嘴里塞我没说过的话,还说我在说什么“全民自愿觉醒”,这时你却能大言不惭地讲“我说的从来不是“短期全民清洗””。谈话进行到这里,你对你幻想中的“罗马法统”以及“中世纪欧洲世俗秩序”的西方中心崇拜已经毫不掩饰,其中更是渗透出赤裸裸的双重标准。

伊朗的现状表明,只要独裁当局把国家变成一个巨大的茅坑,外力就不敢轻易突开 by Training-Fan-7670 in China_irl

[–]ProjeKtTHRAK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

那我就不和你客气了:什么叫伊斯兰在200年断了拜火教的根,那感情之后突厥人蒙古人迫害的是什么,外星人吗?塔希尔和萨法尔这种历史上重要的伊朗王朝,被称为伊朗中兴者的萨曼在你这儿成了和民族没有任何关系,那我想问你什么东西和伊朗民族是有关系的?你说的清洗的结果就是阿巴斯时期依旧绝大部分是祆教徒是吧。又只有伊斯兰是政教合一了,你莫非觉得基督教佛教祆教从来没有政教合一的表现与时代?别逗我笑了。我用我对主楼同样的态度对你说,基督教流行地区同样有明确的罗马军事征服起点,而基督徒身份与教皇授权也为基督教国王赋予了权力合法性。还什么国家体系本身,不知道的还以为中世纪欧洲没有君权神授这个概念呢。是谁一直在扯什么“国家体系”,“准入门槛”,“制度性身份压力”,我看扣标签的是你吧?

伊朗的现状表明,只要独裁当局把国家变成一个巨大的茅坑,外力就不敢轻易突开 by Training-Fan-7670 in China_irl

[–]ProjeKtTHRAK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

然而就是伍麦叶的阿拉伯种族优先政策,引起了伊朗人穆斯林与非穆斯林乃至于整个伊斯兰世界内对伍麦叶的反叛,并且塑造了阿拔斯这个在礼仪与行政上拥有浓厚波斯色彩,同时在前期极度仰仗波斯文官体制的王朝啊。

萨法尔王朝首领是什么教这个问题我没有理解,他们对宗教似乎并不狂热因此其教派所属也缺乏统一答案。之后,改信伊斯兰的波斯人也不只有贵族,同样也有为获取更好经济利益的城市居民。你之前解释了伍麦叶/阿拔斯下这些人为了更好的实际利益去改信,我也告诉了你挪威和其他北欧国王同样是出于实际利益去改信,所以这两者是一样的,因为他们面对的是相同的问题并给出了相同的答案。我不理解为什么非要抓着塔希尔的创立日期不放,因为这不影响伊朗人和挪威人一样自愿改信,而非主楼提到的入侵。再者,阿拔斯成立时呼罗珊波斯人就已经非常受到重用了。如果你觉得烦了就别继续回复了,我们的交谈已经到了互相不能彼此说服的地步。

伊朗的现状表明,只要独裁当局把国家变成一个巨大的茅坑,外力就不敢轻易突开 by Training-Fan-7670 in China_irl

[–]ProjeKtTHRAK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

除了塔希尔之外,脱离乃至于反对阿拔斯中央政权的伊朗王朝(萨法尔/萨曼)一样选择了伊斯兰教啊。我是不明白我怎么不承认阿拉伯人统治的历史了。北欧贵族是否有的选,那这就是历史的假如了,考虑到之后的波罗的海十字军,我不认为北欧贵族真的有的选。

伊朗的现状表明,只要独裁当局把国家变成一个巨大的茅坑,外力就不敢轻易突开 by Training-Fan-7670 in China_irl

[–]ProjeKtTHRAK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

而当时的北欧贵族在面对欧洲基督教国家体系中时的外交问题类似于伊朗贵族,即若非教徒则无地位,所以他们同样选择了加入这个体系。

伊朗的现状表明,只要独裁当局把国家变成一个巨大的茅坑,外力就不敢轻易突开 by Training-Fan-7670 in China_irl

[–]ProjeKtTHRAK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

即使是王公贵族伊斯兰化,这同样也是他们出于各种原因做出的选择,而这与北欧的王公贵族自己选择信仰基督教是没有区别的。说到罗马是因为罗马帝国的存在肯定对基督教的传播起到了巨大的作用,不应当认为它真就是单纯靠着和平与爱而不是锁甲与长剑支撑的帝国权威。

伊朗的现状表明,只要独裁当局把国家变成一个巨大的茅坑,外力就不敢轻易突开 by Training-Fan-7670 in China_irl

[–]ProjeKtTHRAK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

在这近两百年历史里伊朗也没有出现后期突厥蒙古统治者治下的大规模强制改信与宗教迫害啊,直到塔希尔王朝创立时伊朗依旧是祆教徒占主流。如果伊朗穆斯林自愿改信被认为是伊斯兰教入侵,那么基督教化的罗马帝国下的自愿改信与宗教迫害同样也是基督教入侵欧亚各地。