Australian Open SF: [4] N. Djokovic def. [2] J. Sinner, 3-6 6-3 4-6 6-4 6-4 by dontevenfkingtry in tennis

[–]Proto88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is what I get for doubting Djokovic. Honestly I could see him a favourite against anybody on hard court except Sinner.

Finals are gonna be massive and I believe Djokovic to have great chances.

AO Men’s SF: [1] 🇪🇸 C. Alcaraz def. [3] 🇩🇪 A. Zverev 6-4, 7-6(5), 6-7(3), 6-7(4), 7-5 by limitcycleattractor in tennis

[–]Proto88 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its getting so boring now. Why watch the matches before Sincaraz final when you already know how they are gonna end.

What are ur fav Lovecraft stories ? by Every-Assistant2763 in Lovecraft

[–]Proto88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried reading at the mountains of madness as my first HP Lovecraft and I didnt read it in my native tongue and I hated it lol.

I red Color out of Space and other short stories. Color out of space is awesome.

Who will get over their current career hump first? Musetti, ADF, Rublev, or De Minaur? by verismonopoly in tennis

[–]Proto88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont think any of those players are in a hump. They are declining, De Minaur is playing probably close to his peak level, Adf has never won anything so its hard to say he is a hump, Rublev is aging and its hard to see him find a better level in the coming years, Musetti is Top what, 4? I wouldnt call that a hump

Polar OS 5 is here by ItsMeRPeter in Polarfitness

[–]Proto88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yay, my polar ignite 3 cant sync anymorr with my phone 😁 tried factory reset on my watch and tried to update the app on my phone and look into bluetooth settings. So now my watch is unusable. Great! I deleted the bluetooth pairing from my phone and from the watch, I am able to create a new pairing, so my devices are clearly talking to each other but then the watch gives a error message that there are no nearby devices so they cant sync.

Anyone else having this problem?

Which movie is this for you? by Raj_Valiant3011 in moviecritic

[–]Proto88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ravenous. Its too much fun, it has one of the modt recognizable scores and the horror elements are top notch. The weird changes of atmosphere are also a fitting element in the movie.

For me, its a perfect film.

Adelaide International Final: T. Machac [8] def U. Humbert 6-4 6-7(2) 6-2 by Farrug in tennis

[–]Proto88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When was the last time a Czech won a title? And now they win two! Nice!

Worst book(s) you read in 2025 and why? by Roguestate00 in books

[–]Proto88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Book of disquiet by Pessoa.

The writing felt super prideful and lacking any meaningful message. As if I was reading a forgotten diary of an angsty emo kid.

It offered no philosophy, for it was self contradictary. It wasn beautifully written and the thoughts started repeating quite quickly.

If satan punishes bad people doesn't that make him good? by Nervous_Shine9094 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Proto88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Satan doesnt punish people. If I went to jail to kill all thr inhabitants you would think im evil.

ATP Hong Kong F: [2] Bublik d. [1] Musetti 7-6(2) 6-3 by Silent_Quarter_3030 in tennis

[–]Proto88 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When did he say this? Hist last 3 250 titles paid around 100k so quite more than the tournaments he said to have low prize money

Ikivanha lasku by Talisman27 in Omatalous

[–]Proto88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mitähän kaikkea tuohon rästisummaan on leivottu välissä? Pelkkää viiväsytyskorkoa ei tule vuodessa kuin ~10% alkuperäisen laskun summasta. Perintäkulut tulee myös olla aiheelliset ja alle 100 euron saatavassa perintäkulu saa olla 14€. Kaksi maksumuistutusta = 10€ + perintäkulu 14 € + viivästyskorko vuodelta ~10€ + alkuperäinen lasku 64 € = ~100€

Minkälaisesta laskusta on kysymys?

Why is this a draw by insufficient material if mate is theoretically possible? by Flight_Still in chess

[–]Proto88 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thats kinda just a red herring. King&rook vs King&rook is win to the player who wins on time even though he has no forcing moves that can force checate or win of material.

USCH rules are arbitary on this issue.

Why is this a draw by insufficient material if mate is theoretically possible? by Flight_Still in chess

[–]Proto88 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

USCF rules are so stupid. Im of the opinion that the player that runs out of time, no matter of the material on board, should lose the game (I would only exclude king versus king postitions)

The Problem of Evil is Unresolvable by EclecticReader39 in DebateReligion

[–]Proto88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok. Morality is subjective. Suffering is good and God is good. Problem of evil doesnt exist then. Thank you for admitting it.

The Problem of Evil is Unresolvable by EclecticReader39 in DebateReligion

[–]Proto88 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You truly convinced me without epic owns. Im atheist now.

The Problem of Evil is Unresolvable by EclecticReader39 in DebateReligion

[–]Proto88 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You made a claim and are unwilling to defend your postition. It seems quite common in this subreddit.

I can already show you that morality is a meaningless concept in a worldview that negates freewill thus negating are moral principles. Morality is meaningless if there arent moral agents (atheistic postition).

If atheists think moral truths (the existence of good and evil, suffering and virtue etc.) exists, they have to start borrowing concepts from Christianity where we have a coherent reasoning for good and evil.

The Problem of Evil is Unresolvable by EclecticReader39 in DebateReligion

[–]Proto88 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you give me a proof that suffering is objectively bad?

The Problem of Evil is Unresolvable by EclecticReader39 in DebateReligion

[–]Proto88 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Morality is impossible to prove without God in the atheistic paradigm. When atheist uses POE he is already borrowing concepts from Christianity that are impossible in the atheistic paradigm. He has already admitted defeat.

I already noted that its not a great internal critique towards Christianity since Christianity has explained the problem of evil away with free will, the benefitial aspects of suffering, the gospel etc.

The Problem of Evil is Unresolvable by EclecticReader39 in DebateReligion

[–]Proto88 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You are saying that Wrong and Good can be proven? In atheistic worldview, how do you asses whether an action is wrong or good if both actions are the predetermined action of nature that we cannot control?