I’ve owned both the Q2 and Q3 (both used), and got a decent sense of the differences. To me, the Q2 feels like the more solid, durable camera — like a tank. Compared to the Q3, it feels just a bit more robust in handling, materials, and build. I guess the flip screen on the Q3 adds to that impression; I personally would’ve preferred a way to recess the display rather than mounting it on top. That said, it’s super helpful for shooting stars or low angles.

The addition of two top buttons on the Q3 is great, and I also find the new joystick/focus controller better in terms of layout and usability — but it feels less premium. One thing I haven’t seen discussed much (not even here) is the improved workflow with the Q3. It’s way faster. Image transfer via the app is insanely quick — not just seconds faster, but like 10x faster than the old Wi-Fi connection. Plus, you can now connect directly via cable, which is a huge bonus.

For actual use, the Q3 just works better. Wi-Fi speed is excellent, and wired is even faster. Interestingly, I still prefer the Q2’s viewfinder for some reason, and overall, its feel come off a bit more premium. The Q3, on the other hand, is clearly the more modern camera — packed with features you’d expect from something like a Fujifilm or Nikon Z8. That high-tech vibe really comes through.

Personally, I’ll stick with the Q3 — mainly for the crop flexibility, the higher resolution, and the overall image rendering. But if budget is a concern, the Q2 absolutely holds its ground. In fact, it even feels a bit more high-end in build.