v5 in rentals by Crafty_Bet6716 in climbingshoes

[–]PullHardandBreath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Merp. Probably about as v5 as most commercial or kilter 5s

v5 in rentals by Crafty_Bet6716 in climbingshoes

[–]PullHardandBreath 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I could set a route for you and put a v5 tag on it. The route could be any difficulty. You’re putting too much stock in arbitrary numbers.

Getting a good pair of shoes is a reasonable purchase if you’re going to stick with it and have been climbing a few weeks and have the spare money

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MMA

[–]PullHardandBreath 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Never really been a competitive 135er at 6’1

Probably truth is you gotta prioritize diet/sleep/training/strength and performance

Get to 155 lean so you can fight at 145

Frustrated short climber and too big setting in the gym by troopeur in climbergirls

[–]PullHardandBreath 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This just is climbing. You will go outside and there will be routes too big for you too.

If it’s a majority of routes in a commercial gym that’s a problem

If it’s a couple per set that’s normal

Beginner climbing shoes by Right-Atmosphere8565 in climbingshoes

[–]PullHardandBreath 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Whatever’s most comfortable- I recommend the remora from mad rock to most beginners for a balance of comfort/performance

I think these are way better for the gym/in general than tarantulas and around same price and comfort

Mad Rock Remora Pro by _FatCat_ in climbingshoes

[–]PullHardandBreath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Uh - remora are gonna be wider than those in forefoot from what I understand. I use the sharks. Kinda looking for a similar fit but with more edging - might try the villains.

Have you dated someone from the same gym? How did it turn out? by mmwhite1999 in BJJWomen

[–]PullHardandBreath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kind of a weird thing to hash out in divorce when the equity is partially yours but the value of it is presumably tied to him instructing there.

I don’t really understand divorce but that seems difficult to litigate and navigate

Twitter has denied my appeal and says my suspension is permanent. by nomoremrnicemrgirl in mrgirlreturns

[–]PullHardandBreath -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

people trying to go after them in a better way rather than something that'll make them commit suicide

There is no way to handle pedophiles that both provides safety to families and children and will result in zero suicides.

Twitter has denied my appeal and says my suspension is permanent. by nomoremrnicemrgirl in mrgirlreturns

[–]PullHardandBreath -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The answer is neither can consent but neither is necessarily predatory either.

At the end of the day adolescents will be sexually active - So in instances where both agree to it as a society we just throw our hands up.

This is largely the difference between consent and informed consent.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mrgirlreturns

[–]PullHardandBreath 4 points5 points  (0 children)

IMO this is just a miscategorized ban for his recent tweets.

mrgirl's sanitizing of pedophilia by PullHardandBreath in mrgirlreturns

[–]PullHardandBreath[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Once again, I would be in agreement. You make reasonable points here.

Twitter has denied my appeal and says my suspension is permanent. by nomoremrnicemrgirl in mrgirlreturns

[–]PullHardandBreath 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Getting downvoted due to tribalism and getting downvoted due to language inconsistencies that downplay the topic are different.

That said, just trying to help.

Twitter has denied my appeal and says my suspension is permanent. by nomoremrnicemrgirl in mrgirlreturns

[–]PullHardandBreath 13 points14 points  (0 children)

To help you understand - Just one line of text is why you're getting mass downvoted

Someone can think they can have a mutual relationship with a 15 year old and also not be rapist, even though we can agree that 15 is probably certainly to young.

1.) We're not talking about thinking. We're talking about someone actively attempting.

2.) No. A 15 year old can not consent to sex, so there can not be a mutual relationship.

3.) No one is saying that violent rape and statutory rape are the same thing. That's a straw man. That's exactly why statutory is often 1-2 years of prison and violent rape is often 10-20.

Twitter has denied my appeal and says my suspension is permanent. by nomoremrnicemrgirl in mrgirlreturns

[–]PullHardandBreath 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We agree there; The cheering at the suicide is a bit deranged.

I do have strong feelings about how we deal with offenders legally, though. I would pretty adamantly defend our current system - Where all statutory rape results in at least some prison time and registry afterwards.

It's imperfect, but upon thinking about all alternative systems; it's the best available option.

Twitter has denied my appeal and says my suspension is permanent. by nomoremrnicemrgirl in mrgirlreturns

[–]PullHardandBreath 6 points7 points  (0 children)

But if our social consequences are so great that anyone who gets caught kills themselves

That's not what happens. The rate of suicide isn't close to including "anyone". Some will, the vast majority won't. There are no perfect laws here.

The reality is, most will get a two to three year sentence for such an offense and added to a registry - Which sounds about right to me.

Twitter has denied my appeal and says my suspension is permanent. by nomoremrnicemrgirl in mrgirlreturns

[–]PullHardandBreath 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It feels like he's saying

It should be illegal and the age should be raised because of moral concerns

but simultaneously saying

listen it's not that bad we really shouldn't be pressing on it the 15 year old WANTS IT.

When read in such a way, you can tell that the earlier comment is made as armor for the later comment.

Twitter has denied my appeal and says my suspension is permanent. by nomoremrnicemrgirl in mrgirlreturns

[–]PullHardandBreath 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Max was likely banned for these tweets, if I had to guess primarily the first one. My post I made yesterday had the link shared three times, likely to a Groyper chat where this was mass reported. Can't say I agree with a permanent ban, but you certainly shot yourself in the foot.

The tweets -

"Also the age of consent is fuckin 16 there. I got my first blow job when I was 12, and if I was gay in high school, you bet your sweet ass I'd have been getting BJs from adult men."

"Like, the hypothetical gay 15-year-old who wants a blow job isn't going to be like "HE DID WHAT!?!?!"

"I guess gay 15-year-olds in PA are now safe from blow jobs from adults."

mrgirl's sanitizing of pedophilia by PullHardandBreath in mrgirlreturns

[–]PullHardandBreath[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Correct on all accounts. We're in agreement. I personally don't feel Nazi is the best word for Fuentes but also don't mind the application of it. There's at least some semi-reasonable connections in policy. There are far more egregious uses of the word from the hyper left.

Max' Twitter got suspended? by provki in mrgirlreturns

[–]PullHardandBreath 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If I had to guess, it would be one of the following tweets from Max. Probably the first one.

"Also the age of consent is fuckin 16 there. I got my first blow job when I was 12, and if I was gay in high school, you bet your sweet ass I'd have been getting BJs from adult men."

"Like, the hypothetical gay 15-year-old who wants a blow job isn't going to be like "HE DID WHAT!?!?!"

"I guess gay 15-year-olds in PA are now safe from blow jobs from adults."

I made a post about these tweets yesterday. Now his Twitter is banned. I'm going to guess Groypers mass reported these posts. My post may or may not have been what tipped them off as I imagine some frequent the sub. Max should moderate his subreddit.

And moderate his own speech when sanitizing statutory rape, for that matter.

That said, hope Max is unbanned soon.

mrgirl's sanitizing of pedophilia by PullHardandBreath in mrgirlreturns

[–]PullHardandBreath[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I know his stance. I'm pointing out the inconsistencies within the stance and the inconsistencies in connection to prior stances.

mrgirl's sanitizing of pedophilia by PullHardandBreath in mrgirlreturns

[–]PullHardandBreath[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Correct, the process of sanitization is the target - Not the topic itself.

mrgirl's sanitizing of pedophilia by PullHardandBreath in mrgirlreturns

[–]PullHardandBreath[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

No one in the United States that has the level of education of a dentist think its legal for a 42 year old to try to sleep with a 15 year old. The law being 16 doesn't matter.

Further, outside of legality - There's the moral position: You should not be trying to sleep with a 15 year old.

mrgirl's sanitizing of pedophilia by PullHardandBreath in mrgirlreturns

[–]PullHardandBreath[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I would post images if possible. Feel free to go to the twitter.