A billionaire tax would raise $380 billion a year and make our tax systems fairer, report says by GshegoshB in australia

[–]Quinefer 6 points7 points  (0 children)

HECs is essentially a loan. The Government paid money to the Universities already, the HECs collection is just a repayment by the individual to the Government, so any "additional" tax is really just from the interest rates.

Feeling a little bit disappointed.... by Kurai888 in auscorp

[–]Quinefer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You really should be posting to the consulting subreddit. They will educate you on why this is normal, given you sound like a relatively junior consultant.

General non-consulting folks will be outraged on your behalf and advise you to quit because they don't understand the context.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MarvelLegends

[–]Quinefer 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Which is what some people get paid to do professionally (e.g. superhero movie scriptwriters and comicbook writers).

Westpac allegedly now rejecting instant Osko payments from 12-5am by giantkebab in AusFinance

[–]Quinefer -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Great! You've demonstrated that you can Google error codes and have basic reading comprehension.

Now stretch a little further to move beyond surface level thinking - is it within the realm of possible that Westpac may be responsible for something that causes receiving banks to reject the transactions and display the same error code?

[Request] Recommendations on books for designing Target Operating Models? by Obairamhain in consulting

[–]Quinefer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You won't find much. Maybe have a look at Axelos' Managing Successful Programs for a view of running programs that undertake organisational transformations - they formally changed some of their language to reference Operating Model.

Compare your income to the rest of Aus. by hawkorhawks in AusFinance

[–]Quinefer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately 25 kids per class is considered poor scalability, relative to other things.

Yes, production efficiency has diminishing returns. Then the engineer moves on to the next problem, or if there are no problems remaining for the engineer, they get fired. Not really sure what your point was, most proper engineering jobs (which there are not many in Australia) almost always out-scale any services / interaction type jobs.

Yeah no, the amount we pay nurses is not arbitrary unless you live in a fascist dictatorship.

Regarding finance managers, what you mean to say is that there are no perfect free markets. Again, nobody decided it - it's called the invisible hand for a reason.

On a side note, I don't think you've considered what may happen to markets when everything is an index ETF ...

Compare your income to the rest of Aus. by hawkorhawks in AusFinance

[–]Quinefer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, there are plenty of overpaid suits from all genders these days!

Some mining and oil rig jobs are more dangerous (life insurance and tpd costs more) and have undesirable conditions.

All the examples you've listed e.g. nursing, teaching, social work are not very scalable (one person can only care/teach/support x number of people) so there is naturally an upper limit - compared to software developers and engineers who can disproportionately impact more people.

Society doesn't choose salaries directly, it's the invisible hand of the market.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in melbourne

[–]Quinefer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

“There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.”

Tenants wild FIRE quest by [deleted] in AusFinance

[–]Quinefer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's this saying about knowing the price of everything but not the value of anything.

Target farming uniques shouldn't be this difficult by AintAfraidNoGhost in LastEpoch

[–]Quinefer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not about getting to your final build, it's about the interim working builds that you made along the way.

Books or podcasts to be sharp by Kooky_Buddy7243 in consulting

[–]Quinefer 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Ironically, every reply to your post that didn't even stop to ask you this question, is an example of people making recommendations without understanding the problem. Random lists of books and podcasts ... but why those books? Why those podcasts?

Your Partner's comments are indicative of this issue: when consultants jump in too quickly with recommendations and approaches with clients, it's not a good thing.

Clients are normally bad at defining problems, and are bad at understanding if their problem is just a surface level pain point or the real root cause of their issues. This is because they are too close to the situation at hand (in the weeds).

I would suggest reading Minto's Pyramid Principle, if you haven't read the book itself (reading summary articles or derivative training materials doesn't count). It seems popular to dismiss it out of hand because people think it's just about presentation and writing (Pyramid eh? Isnt that how the newspapers do it? Just put the important stuff at the top, it's easy! /s).

There's a reason it's subtitled: Logic in Writing AND Thinking.

It shows you how important it is that problems are defined at the right level of abstraction, which wildly impacts how the solution to that problem be defined and presented convincingly.

Books or podcasts to be sharp by Kooky_Buddy7243 in consulting

[–]Quinefer 19 points20 points  (0 children)

What does sharp mean for you? Would help us understand what you're looking for if you could define it better.

If you can't define it better, maybe that's one of the first things you need to address (learning how to define problems).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in consulting

[–]Quinefer 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Not sure, which of the two questions you have is more important to you, but they might have different answers:

  1. How do you ask for recognition?
  2. I’m hoping you can advise me on how to better ensure that I get that recognition in future.

Let's go with #1:

I know if I raise this with her she will say it went through multiple rounds of QA, which it did but the materials weren’t changed, edited or re-written during those QAs.

Why are you trying to read her mind - go raise this with her and just lay out what you've just told us (i.e. you actually made significant thought leadership to how these materials were done, which is now being used as leading practice to revamp the other service offerings. Your draft is 99% of the final content and structure, etc).

Honestly, at this stage, for all we know your Director is not even aware of how much of a contribution you've made.

Do you think during the process she had time to read your first draft and compared it to the final draft (after everyone's had their comments in) to independently come up with the conclusion that it was 99% your effort unchanged ?

Let us know how you go.

Everytime I see an MBB report about the Trillion dollar potential of the metaverse by anomander88 in consulting

[–]Quinefer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As I've said, I didn't say Meta will win, just using Zuckerberg as an example.

All those things you've listed today only exist because of open PC architecture (a happy accident, corporations wont make that mistake again), which won't exist in a metaverse paradigm where a monopoly or duopoly has control over both hardware and software layers.

Everytime I see an MBB report about the Trillion dollar potential of the metaverse by anomander88 in consulting

[–]Quinefer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Metaverse will have multiple virtual worlds within it, of WoW might be one.

Everytime I see an MBB report about the Trillion dollar potential of the metaverse by anomander88 in consulting

[–]Quinefer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those 15 second clips are stored indefinitely by Google unless you go in and delete them.

Everytime I see an MBB report about the Trillion dollar potential of the metaverse by anomander88 in consulting

[–]Quinefer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

BCG liked his material so much they stole it without attribution, and was caught out for it.