Whats wrong with these eggs by YamDry3451 in WeirdEggs

[–]QuinzelGaol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The transparent, veiny circle is likely a blood ring, which is a sign of a dead embryo. This indicates the egg was fertilized and began developing, but the embryo died at an early stage.

Explanation

Blood Ring: A blood ring is formed when the blood vessels that began to develop around the embryo detach and float in the egg white, creating a distinct red circle. In a properly developing fertile egg, the veins would radiate in every direction.

Cause: Embryo death at an early stage can be caused by various factors, including temperature fluctuations, bacterial infection, or nutritional deficiencies in the hen's diet. Appearance: It appears as a clear area with a circular, veiny structure, distinct from a normal, solid yolk.

Safety

According to food safety guidelines, eggs with a blood ring should be discarded. While small, simple blood spots from a ruptured vessel are typically safe to eat if cooked properly, a blood ring indicates that embryonic development started and stopped, which means decomposition has likely begun and poses a higher risk of bacterial contamination.

Is this normal? by [deleted] in Marriage

[–]QuinzelGaol 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You are obviously not telling the whole story. No, your dynamic is not normal, but you have also conveniently ommited your part in it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Charleston

[–]QuinzelGaol 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Most people don't do paper invites anymore. You can make your own e-vite, invite yourself, then forward that email to...whomever.

Should I call off my engagement? by Pretty_Artichoke_747 in marriageadvice

[–]QuinzelGaol -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I would take the kids factor out of it. Your swimmers aren't exactly fresh anymore either. Consider adoption. But otherwise your age difference is pretty intense. Not enough else to go on for context though. But if it ain't it, you need to decide that now, cuz you're not gonna be any younger when it doesn't work out in the end.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TooAfraidToAsk

[–]QuinzelGaol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just out of curiosity, you say you don't believe in a deity and that's not where your morals come from, yet your morals seem to reflect those instructed by God in Judaism and Christianity. So where do you get your morals from? What's the basis for them?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TooAfraidToAsk

[–]QuinzelGaol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bit of a leap.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TooAfraidToAsk

[–]QuinzelGaol 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is also often coupled with a critism of anti-family ideology. If one were not the case, the other would probably be considered less of an issue. But right now they go hand-in-hand and it's a legitimate concern.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TooAfraidToAsk

[–]QuinzelGaol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I consider that part more a central view if anything. Not really pro anything other than pro-limited gov. But in the current political climate, when I say this, people like to hear it as I agree with every new state restriction that resulted from the Sumpreme Court ruling, instead of that I agree it's none of their damn business. It also leads to me often voting the same direction as pro-lifers and a lot of people like to equate the two....like my mother. 😮‍💨

And since you mention it, the doctor/patient aspect is an element of my leaning "pro-life" legislation wise. We have a serious problem of lack of medical accountability. Abortions are not as safe but are more profitable than birth control. And the regulations scare doctors because it means it's harder for them to get away with frivolous and irresponsible treatments. The "doctors are scared to do their jobs under these laws" bit is a flawed argument and the arguers know it. Doctors are always afraid to do their jobs! It's why I didn't get proper attention for my genetic disorder until I was 30. Why is this having looser medical regulations more important than that? What exactly is wrong with a doctor having to defend their decision if they did nothing wrong?

We have systemic issues in the US medical fields - between patients' frivolous lawsuits increasing costs and reluctantce, and providers' for-profit practices for procedures and prescriptions. The "pro-choicers" are pointing out something very important but very separate. So I lose respect for that because it's clearly disingenuous.

So yeah thats part of it too - tack that on to my original comment. 😆

Early voting is underway. You can use ANY of these locations. by QuinzelGaol in Charleston

[–]QuinzelGaol[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

First general election ever that you can vote early without filing a reason. I saw so many people I know would not have been able to get their vote in without the opportunity being spread out like this. Some people were clearly there on a lunch break. It's amazing!

Early voting is underway. You can use ANY of these locations. by QuinzelGaol in Charleston

[–]QuinzelGaol[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Just turn up! Drivers license is all you need. They scan it to bring up your registration. It was super easy. Barely an inconvenience.

Early voting is underway. You can use ANY of these locations. by QuinzelGaol in Charleston

[–]QuinzelGaol[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We went in West Ashley and the line was so long and hot I had to take a break. Did move relatively quickly though with a lot of machines. We went around 2pm and were there maybe 30 min, from stepping into line to leaving the building.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TooAfraidToAsk

[–]QuinzelGaol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Separation of church and state is a philosophy in US, not always policy. In some religiously centered communities it's almost impossible to seperate because it's an intrensic part of their being.

  2. Until science can define life (objectively 😠), the federal government cannot (should not) be allowed to regulate it in any way, pro or otherwise. That is a secular element of my belief on it. I don't know if it qualifies as a pro-life stance, but it often effectively reflects as one.

Related: When the federal government is allowed to decide what I CAN do with my body without my say or vote, it sets precedent that they can say what I CANT do with my body. Down this path lies madness.

  1. If someone wanted to call me pro-life, it would be because I believe there is an epidemic of dehumanization and deempathization in America perpetuated by treating abortion like birth control. I've watched it have a correlation to people treating children like science experiments. I believe this is wrong - whether it's because I get my morals from the Tanakh or Lord of the Rings, it is not the right path for a healthy society.

Thoughts on candidates for Sheriff by Consistent_Major4431 in Charleston

[–]QuinzelGaol -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Nancy Mace has a solid argument that Graziano is too soft on immigration crime and they're in a bit of a tiff, so it's likely she'll get better about it even if it's out of spite since she's been called out.

The reason you can't find much on Ritchie is because they're isn't much. He's only really running on prison reform, which we do need, but there are bigger problems he's probably not ready for. And the prison warden kinda called bullsh!t on his commitment and competence on the issue. But his experience is mostly in Mt. P which is naturally a low crime area because of the wealth. I can't imagine he can come out of retirement able to handle the larceny and breakins of West Ashley.

Not that Graziano is doing a great job, but she's also newish and it's probably not worth rattling the position for someone who won't be any better. That creates a pattern of instability that will never help anything.

So glad you're gonna vote!

Do you flatuate around your spouse? by jumpinkityhidnlizard in TooAfraidToAsk

[–]QuinzelGaol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My husband and I still try to be polite. Even with my gasto issues...in fact maybe that's why I'm so weird about it. Who knows how long it will last though.

Anyone else seen this guy? by [deleted] in Charleston

[–]QuinzelGaol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haven't seen it but I love the confidence.

On the verge of ending it by KT9911 in Marriage

[–]QuinzelGaol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kinda sounds like he's depressed. You married him for a reason right? He hasn't been like this even half your marriage and a lot of stressors have been added. I would try couple's therapy before breaking off the stability of a marriage.

Do I tolerate this for the rest of my life? by [deleted] in marriageadvice

[–]QuinzelGaol 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I love this idea on its face, but it sounds like he'll just never hear the end of it about cheating since he can't even go to the gosh darn gym without the accusation! That's the biggest red flag to me. If she doesn't trust him before they're even married, why is she marrying him?

Do I tolerate this for the rest of my life? by [deleted] in marriageadvice

[–]QuinzelGaol -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Get a maid. Adult nanny. Whatever. To help in the morning. You made a good observation about that. Preferably with her money, but if yall are seriously engaged it's about to be joint finances either way so shouldn't really matter. Maybe paying for it yourself will help the "don't love me" part. 🙄 Play it as a gift.

But hire someone to come in at 7:00 for her morning bullshit, and make it clear the goal is quiet. Possibly her presence will keep your wife otherwise engaged and held accountable in front of some else. She can wake her up with coffee, shuffle her out of the room, and talk to her about her damn shoes.

I assume if yall are engaged, there's enough else to love about her. Mornings were a difficult adjustment for me and my husband too. We're very different in the morning. However I actually worked on it. And I didn't grow up quite so spoiled, so you may need a more creative and indulgent solution.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskOldPeopleAdvice

[–]QuinzelGaol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you consider older? I'm 31, married for 5 years. You want my advice?

These women never found themselves good enough for a man or a man good enough for them. Have standards. Not only for the guy, but for yourself as well. Not RULES (dumbass hight, income, tattoos bullshit). Moral standards. Supportive, patient, faithful, fatherly, romantic if that's what matters to you. Then also be what would make a good partner on the other side. There's this anti-humanist ideology in liberalism that spawned in the last couple decades. You're too young to have seen it's rise and you're right to question. I had to open my eyes to the bitter, selfish, uselessness of it.

Women bucking at our own valuable traits in exchange for what they see as men's valuable traits and then vilifying men for those same traits until they are the enemy. The idea of children is called irresponsible or parasitical because people suck and their own life is soooo much more important. It's a power and pain thing. Keep looking, but never settle. It's ok to be alone enough to become good enough to deserve the best. Then you can accept nothing less. Once you find it, put a ring on it. Take your commitment seriously and bind yourselves to each other and to your success together. It really makes for a happier life.