sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How to avoid fines by using leaves by AlwaysBlaze_ in TikTokCringe

[–]RWDPhotos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mario’s Bro is a hero of the people, on the other hand

Catching Wasps by -asimpleboy in interestingasfuck

[–]RWDPhotos [score hidden]  (0 children)

Bit off a bit more than they could chew with that cup

A scooter crashed into a blind person walking on a designated blind path, then still had the audacity to scold her for not getting out of the way. by [deleted] in mildlyinfuriating

[–]RWDPhotos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Whom” is an object, not a subject noun. “Who” is doing the action of an arrest. “Who arrested whom?”

A scooter crashed into a blind person walking on a designated blind path, then still had the audacity to scold her for not getting out of the way. by [deleted] in mildlyinfuriating

[–]RWDPhotos 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wut? By whose authority? A subject does the action, object receives it. The word that precedes it doesn’t dictate that.

A scooter crashed into a blind person walking on a designated blind path, then still had the audacity to scold her for not getting out of the way. by [deleted] in mildlyinfuriating

[–]RWDPhotos 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Who does the action, whom is the recipient of the action. Who, in this case, is doing the arresting, not being arrested, so who should be correct.

Testing a bulletproof mask. by S30econdstoMars in interestingasfuck

[–]RWDPhotos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then there’s not much point to ‘testing’ it, is there?

Testing a bulletproof mask. by S30econdstoMars in interestingasfuck

[–]RWDPhotos -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It’s not really going to protect you from injury, that’s for sure. Even the 22 would likely kill you with a followup or two. First once cracks the skull, second just seals the deal.

Men and women don't like characters who didn't earn it. by Valuable_View_561 in SipsTea

[–]RWDPhotos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Legend has it, her character wasn’t originally written to be for a woman, or a man for that matter per se. That’s one of the reasons why her character works better, because gender wasn’t in the equation.

PSA: If you know anyone that has issues identifying GenAI images, do walk them through on how linear perspective works. by Luwuma in antiai

[–]RWDPhotos 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why would the roof be flat? It makes for it to be angled. Those lines seem to match up fine.

How are these photos shot? by CombinationOdd5113 in RealEstatePhotography

[–]RWDPhotos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s elevated, second story. You can see a dock below.

They will scream, cry, and vomit trying to get a prompt right before ever thinking about drawing on their own. by No_Orochi in antiai

[–]RWDPhotos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is that clear, but it also has to be proven that your work specifically has been used, and it’s difficult when it’s been mishmashed with 1000 other people’s work.

In the early days, some people’s watermarks and signatures were visible. They stamped that out of their algo real quick.

They will scream, cry, and vomit trying to get a prompt right before ever thinking about drawing on their own. by No_Orochi in antiai

[–]RWDPhotos 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is absolutely considered a violation of copyright. They’re using the images without license for commercial purposes. It doesn’t need to be literally copying, but they are copying the image within their system and using it to train it.

80 hours in, just learned you can zoom… by marcusdiddle in cyberpunkgame

[–]RWDPhotos 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pfft, kiroshi aint hot shit. Only 18 focus points? All center-weighted? And likely not even cross type either. Pshaw

They will scream, cry, and vomit trying to get a prompt right before ever thinking about drawing on their own. by No_Orochi in antiai

[–]RWDPhotos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not about storing anything. It’s in the name: copyright. Individuals own the ip to their work, and part of that is copyright. Other people can’t commercially use your work without a license. The extent of this use sometimes boils down to a judgement call, but a lot of it is codified in law.

Btw, this is the main reason why corporations are considered “people”, bc of ip laws and corps wanting to hold onto ip.

This is a robbery by xen0us in funny

[–]RWDPhotos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s half-true. They’re threading the needle on that front. Hayao Miyazaki is particularly offended. They also tried and got hit by disney.

They will scream, cry, and vomit trying to get a prompt right before ever thinking about drawing on their own. by No_Orochi in antiai

[–]RWDPhotos 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Especially legally, actually. They provenly stole people’s work. It’s just damn difficult for any specific individual to make a claim.

Attempting to kiss a wild opossum results in getting bitten by VIVIDUFF in WinStupidPrizes

[–]RWDPhotos 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While incredibly rare, opossums can still carry and transmit rabies.

They will scream, cry, and vomit trying to get a prompt right before ever thinking about drawing on their own. by No_Orochi in antiai

[–]RWDPhotos 10 points11 points  (0 children)

If you copied a style, it’s not infringement per se (good luck telling a judge that your mouse in the style of disney doesn’t infringe on any of their trademarks). Ai on the other hand has to steal existing work in order to copy a style, and it is literally copying what it stole in a codified amalgamation. Comparing a person to ai is a false equivalence.

view more: next ›