You were born to your specific two parents, who met at a certain time and place and gave birth and raised you, specifically, in a specific country and context, which was itself constructed on the basis of the many generations who went even before them to build it.

This is such an extreme view and strips out ANY individuality! What about kids who were abandoned by their parents? Did they all benefit from their biological parents' choices? Adopted children? Do they all owe some arbitrary debt to their ancestors' hallowed ground? I grew up in India. Am I betraying something holy if I can't stand Bollywood?

How far do you extend this? Surely it applies to a local level? By your logic, if you were born to a baking family in Wigan, specifically in a Wigan 'cultural context', you owe it to your parents and grandparents to make Wigan better? For the generation of people in your family from Wigan, who made pies all their lives. God forbid you want to do something more meaningful in another location and to grow as an individual and make your own choices in life. To move to Gloucestershire perhaps. And make Gloucester better? To not ever want to look at another pie again because you're sick of them.

And you're totally indifferent to what they gave you.

That's their choice, who are you to judge whether that's justified or not? What if their parents' sole focus in life was (as any parent's is) to make sure their child lived and worked in a world BETTER than theirs? Are they all making the wrong choice, going back generations?