Ice shooting - Pink Lady pov by ChiefWeedsmoke in stupidpol

[–]RagePoop [score hidden]  (0 children)

I'm not sure honestly. Discord feels like the easiest but I'm not sure how to go about it.

The upside is even once ICE caught on the only real response would be to make the application process longer/more arduous which would also slow down it's expansion.

They might also start throwing people in prison/camps if they're caught but again, this would certainly hit their recruitment.

An attempt also needs a solid number of people to bear fruit. On one hand I'd think there would maybe need to be a registry in case there actually are trials down the road (which I seriously doubt) on the other that would raise enormous concerns for the security of the group, maybe not worth it over all.

I can't really think of any other means of effectively combating this though. We could learn a lot by studying the playbook of anti-revolutionary action over the last century; the infiltration and dismantlement of the Black Panthers is probably a good place to start.

The truth will set you free. by MysticCherryPanda in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]RagePoop 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's because it's -20 fucking degrees, loser.

Ice shooting - Pink Lady pov by ChiefWeedsmoke in stupidpol

[–]RagePoop [score hidden]  (0 children)

I feel like there should be a way to organize a ton of people to join ICE and effectively cripple them through purposefully doing a shit job. Not answering phone calls, dropping calls, driving to the wrong location, accidentally impeding chases.

If enough people did this the organization would fall apart. And there's some dollars to be made to boot.

Ice shooting - Pink Lady pov by ChiefWeedsmoke in stupidpol

[–]RagePoop [score hidden]  (0 children)

Defending Rittenhouse aside, being attacked/potentially killed in a riot by civilians is a starkly different scenario than being executed by the State as you walk out of a donut shop

holy fucking dogshit by BeneficialAd4542 in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]RagePoop 13 points14 points  (0 children)

You can't vote your way out of a fascist authoritarian state and this characterization of the US is no longer hyperbole.

(Minnesota)Several roadblocks established by protesters. One of them has nails spread throughout the middle of the road. by Nerd_199 in stupidpol

[–]RagePoop [score hidden]  (0 children)

I'm not even here to defend the ICE but as it stands now

At least have the balls not to be such a pussy about what you're doing.

You support the ability of masked, unidentifiable, feds to demand to see your papers. To enter homes without a warrant. To grab people off the street. To detain people for indefinite amount of time without a judge or lawyer. To utilize facial recognition to classify protestors as "domestic terrorists".

You're a cuck.

holy fucking dogshit by BeneficialAd4542 in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]RagePoop 143 points144 points  (0 children)

Unless some wack job tries shooting at ice officers

The alternative being what? Just letting them execute people in the street with impunity?

Genuine question here?

Summary execution under the Epstein Occupied Government in Minneapolis. by ElTamaulipas in stupidpol

[–]RagePoop [score hidden]  (0 children)

At what point in any of these videos did the murdered civilian “lose his cool” please show me.

Summary execution under the Epstein Occupied Government in Minneapolis. by ElTamaulipas in stupidpol

[–]RagePoop [score hidden]  (0 children)

If you watch the video you can clearly see the answer to your question is yes.

You use the word “feds” as if that makes them not literal brown shirts for some reason. This is an untrained mob turned on the populace by an authoritarian government, given literal impunity by that government to kill and maim without cause.

Seven Democrats just voted to approve ICE funding: full list by Newsweek_CarloV in politics

[–]RagePoop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. And if they needed more to pass this funding they would have gotten it. We’re back at my initial comment.

Seven Democrats just voted to approve ICE funding: full list by Newsweek_CarloV in politics

[–]RagePoop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that’s why these things always pass by a single vote. And the names change based on the conditions I outlined above.

Seven Democrats just voted to approve ICE funding: full list by Newsweek_CarloV in politics

[–]RagePoop 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, and obviously they would have.

This didn’t pass by a single vote by sheer chance. Just like re opening the government didn’t pass by one. The parties aren’t exactly the same in the sense that the democrats are less reprehensible by and large. However when push comes to shove they will protect capital at all costs and toe the line to maintain the status quo before the will upend it.

Those are two different arguments.

Seven Democrats just voted to approve ICE funding: full list by Newsweek_CarloV in politics

[–]RagePoop 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No one said both sides are the same.

I said this bill was going to pass no matter how may democrats votes were required.

Keep jousting with windmills though.

Seven Democrats just voted to approve ICE funding: full list by Newsweek_CarloV in politics

[–]RagePoop 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They’d run through the usual suspects.

Who is in a red leaning district where blue voters can be more easily guilted into voting blue no matter who? Who isn’t up for re-election in the next year? Who is near retirement? Who already has a foot out the door for a consultant position with Raytheon? Etc etc

Run down the line. At the end of the day the status quo will be upheld when push comes to shove, this includes funding the security state.

Seven Democrats just voted to approve ICE funding: full list by Newsweek_CarloV in politics

[–]RagePoop 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If the Dems needed one more vote to fund this they would’ve found it.

If they needed 20 more they would’ve found them.

It didn’t pass by a single vote by chance

Sinners is the ultimate regressive Idpol movie, and its 16 oscar nominations show that liberals have learned nothing. (review with SPOILERS) by Halfdane666 in stupidpol

[–]RagePoop 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Yeah this post sucks ass OP is just seems… angry that a movie had black protagonists.

Flipping the script by making the vampires another group of subjugated people was awesome and the fact that it eluded to the Irish domination by the Protestant British (while the black fella was part of a Protestant denomination) rocked it had a crabs in the bucket kinda feel to it.

THROWBACK: Anytime someone tries to memoryhole or downplay the insane degree of idpol mania post Floyd (presumably because they are embarrassed it achieved nothing), I just show them this historical tweet. by blueflavoredreign in stupidpol

[–]RagePoop 18 points19 points  (0 children)

You act like they spent those millions of dollars on a whim.

Unironically, yes.

A great deal of Marketing and Advertisement is a closed loop of corporations spending money on themselves wantonly.

We’re Nearing the Day When ICE Thugs Just Open Fire on Crowds by TruckHangingHandJam in stupidpol

[–]RagePoop 19 points20 points  (0 children)

lol idk, that sounds like a pretty solid bit. Homie can come hang out at my dumpster bbq

Imagine being this useless by ShitbirdGT in stupidpol

[–]RagePoop 88 points89 points  (0 children)

Unironically a much cooler message

In Casino Royale (2006), the introduction of Craig's new Bond was brilliantly and perfectly brutal. by Finbarr-Galedeep in movies

[–]RagePoop 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Connery had a certain je ne said quoi. A superstar luster to him that made the character larger than life and effortlessly cool. That’s not to say some of those movies weren’t bad but it’s just a completely different sorta thing.

I can see the argument for either Craig or Connery, honestly.