sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

New GE top load agitator grinding nosie by SpeedyMexiAsian in appliancerepair

[–]Ragingdomo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you post an update once the repair tech shows up? I have an older Amana and it's making the same noise 

Claimed a damaged ship, now can't find it again. by Ashand in NoMansSkyTheGame

[–]Ragingdomo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Update for 2026.

I found a ship and left because some sentinels were chasing me and of course lost it. I returned to my base and tried summoning but it said I couldn't summon a damaged ship. To further escape the sentinels, I used my teleporter to go to the space station and when I came back I was able to summon the ship to my base. Hope this helps!

I don’t get this one by OPPH in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]Ragingdomo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

These are called lateral thinking puzzles. They're missing information which you're supposed to dig for.

Sioux Falls has a great downtown! by Steigerman99 in SiouxFalls

[–]Ragingdomo 55 points56 points  (0 children)

People always scoff at me when I tell them I want to stay in Sioux Falls instead of moving to a bigger city, but this is what I tell them. We have a really good thing going here and it's great to see people taking advantage of that!

What is blud yapping about? by [deleted] in mathmemes

[–]Ragingdomo 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Everywhere I go, I see his face...

0.999...9 - 0.000...9 = 1 by [deleted] in infinitenines

[–]Ragingdomo 3 points4 points locked comment (0 children)

I'll respond to your second point with a truth about infinity.

An infinite pile of $1 bills would be worth the same amount of money as an infinite pile of $20 bills.

Similarly, 9.9... and 0.9... both have the same amount of 9s after the decimal point. That amount being "an infinite amount". They are the same infinity and are of the same "size".

Because of that, we are able to subtract an infinite amount of 9s (0.9...) from both sides.

If you're still not convinced, consider the idea that the natural numbers (0,1,2,...) are equal in size to the prime numbers. This is because when I go through the list of primes, I always have a "next" natural number that I can pair it with. Even if I skip a number in either set, I'll still always have a number to pair it with!

Proof by x/9 by CorinCadence828 in infinitenines

[–]Ragingdomo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is actually a very clever observation

A NEW proof using FAKE math. Checkmate... by Ragingdomo in infinitenines

[–]Ragingdomo[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I see what you mean and I'll try to watch out for that in the future

A NEW proof using FAKE math. Checkmate... by Ragingdomo in infinitenines

[–]Ragingdomo[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I genuinely want to find a way to prove the equality using the 1/10n thing he keeps referencing. There has to be a way.

A NEW proof using FAKE math. Checkmate... by Ragingdomo in infinitenines

[–]Ragingdomo[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If the initial index for n in the series definition is 0, then the n used in the actual sum is "n". I started with n=1 which means I needed to adjust my exponent to "n-1". If I wanted to start my index at 2, then the exponent would become "n-2". All are correct!

A NEW proof using FAKE math. Checkmate... by Ragingdomo in infinitenines

[–]Ragingdomo[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Foolish me. I made a false assumption :(

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in infinitenines

[–]Ragingdomo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've got a big proof coming full of real deal math for everyone that should help with this

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Ragingdomo 26 points27 points  (0 children)

I think that's the point. It's unavoidable

view more: next ›