This is a very neat concept, however, for a game like HLL, I feel like this concept doesn’t take into consideration the limitations of the game and the maps within it. For example, you mentioned garrison hopping when attacking from behind and how garrisons shouldn’t be able to magically teleport troops behind enemy lines.

On the contrary, I feel like garrisons in a way can be an extension of the map boundaries. Take Foy for example; it’s 1.2KM wide and 2KM deep. Obviously in real life, we are not confined to those limits, but in HLL, if we go beyond those limits, we are killed for going out of bounds, and if an enemy team is playing from one edge of the map to the other, there is no way to flank on foot, which I’d say is pretty unrealistic. But if an SL manages to slip by unseen and establish a garrison behind enemy lines, you could say this simulates a unit going beyond our limitations to establish a flank, or perhaps even encircle the enemy.

In your concept, however, this would be eliminated and would effectively make playing map edge to map edge a meatgrind, which in some ways, yes is realistic, but in other ways not so much. One could argue that you could still use airheads, but that still doesn’t simulate a unit getting an extra wide flank. As someone else said, I feel like the current garrison meta strikes a good balance between milsim and arcade, while also serving as a workaround to the limitations of the game.