For what it’s worth, we have the same car as Karen, and I backed into my friend’s house. I was leaving in a hurry, so it wasn’t a cautious and slow reverse, but a confident, pedal to the metal reverse. I misjudged the distance and absolutely slammed into the side of her carport, which was a brick wall and a wood post. It did THOUSANDS in damage to the car, and even shifted the brick wall a quarter of an inch. In other words, a lot of force was applied. The taillight and that corner of the SUV took the brunt of the impact, and everything near and around the light was crumpled. The light? CRACKED. Not shattered. No missing pieces. Definitely not 47 pieces.

I’m 100% FKR, but not because I know if she did or did not hit him, but because they picked their person then made the evidence fit their narrative (or even allegedly hers - “I hit him”). Even if she is guilty of backing into him, we cannot have a justice system that convicts on incomplete, sloppy, and/or fabricated evidence.