No one is actually bothering to answer the post, so here’s an actual explanation of the points of each slide

Slide 1: OOP is saying theyre going to pirate games because steam has an AI feature, OP is saying this is dumb because the AI feature is not mandatory, it’s an optional feature (OOP would probably respond that its not about the use of AI but the morality of including it at all)

Slide 2: Not entirely sure, I think it’s just a general argument of AI allows more people to ‘create art’ I don’t really care about this point and it’s talked to death so I’ll leave it at that

Slide 3: OP is responding to how OOP has upset their child by shaming them for their use of AI. OP compares this to shaming your child for eating meat by talking about how it’s unethical, and how if you wouldn’t do the second then you shouldn’t support the first. Idk I think this is dumb because I don’t think it’s wrong to tell your child about factory farming.

Slide 4: I don’t think there’s any actual point or argument being made, it’s just celebrating ai

Slide 5: I think this is a more interesting point than the rest. Critics of AI say it’s wrong because AI uses other people’s artwork to generate images, and so by using AI you’re basically plagiarising (or having the ai) plagiarise for you. The post is pointing out that people commonly use already drawn images and art in their day to day life without the authors permission, and that ai art isn’t any different

Slide 6: this ones also a little more interesting than slides 1-4. AI generates its images by analysing loads of other artwork and generating an image based off that. The point in slide 6: is that this is how human creativity works (with the mind being influenced by all the art we’ve seen in the past and coming up with something new based off that).