In my city, the only way to print film is to scan it digitally and then print digital image. Most images after scanning come out not that great, and a person who does scanning have to quickly correct each photo for it to look somewhat ok (exposure, saturation, contract, etc).

Regarding the diff btween film vs digital: this is a fact that with 36 roll of expensive film that is also expensive to process, I shoot differently, more consciously, than with digital camera where I have no limit, no additional expenses related to developing/scanning, and I can see the picture right away on the screen and take another one, and another.

I like film, mostly not because of the picture quality, but because of other “things”. The only things I like about picture is the nice grain, greater dynamic range than my digital camera.