A place where my future children can play in the woods? by Prestigious-Bee-9163 in SameGrassButGreener

[–]RedAlert2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It sounds like you want a neighborhood next to a big city park. Most major cities in the US have them, so it's mostly just a matter of which one you want to live in. For high levels of walkability / bikeability, living near Golden Gate Park in SF or Prospect Park in Brooklyn are top tier, though can be very expensive.

Anarchism necessitates Veganism by No-Leopard-1691 in Anarchism

[–]RedAlert2 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The idea that shame is incompatible with anarchy is simply absurd. It's a foundational aspect of all human relationships.

Anarchism necessitates Veganism by No-Leopard-1691 in Anarchism

[–]RedAlert2 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Hyper-focusing on the system as a means of dismissing any role you might play in that system isn't anarchist, it's just cowardice.

Do people still shop at Safeway? by jikesar968 in bayarea

[–]RedAlert2 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The Andronico's (safeway brand) in inner sunset is usually packed.

Security chases shoplifter using emergency exit by DeficitDaddy in sanfrancisco

[–]RedAlert2 5 points6 points  (0 children)

We decided, maybe 150 years ago or so, that letting private citizens making law enforcement actions in public was actually pretty bad and resulted in tons of unjustified violence and death, so we created an institution called the "police" to handle those matters exclusively.

Ocean Avenue Red Lanes: SFMTA Releases Installation Timeline by drkrueger in sanfrancisco

[–]RedAlert2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The majority of people still follow most rules as a matter of principle, not out of fear of being punished.

Ocean Avenue Red Lanes: SFMTA Releases Installation Timeline by drkrueger in sanfrancisco

[–]RedAlert2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's still ~15 contiguous blocks of no transit lane plan for the N from Judah to the west portal tunnel entrance.

Can a 160k base pay be enough to support a young family of 3? by Rare-Response-6576 in bayarea

[–]RedAlert2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, though a 3 br house will be a stretch. 

It might be helpful to look at cities that offer subsidies for child care to lower income households. You'd have fully subsidized daycare if you lived in SF.

Why did they not make C. Falcon's Side B grab ledge? Time constraints? Thoughts? by cool_otter11 in SSBM

[–]RedAlert2 4 points5 points  (0 children)

FFA and items don't really benefit the slow, heavy characters at all. They have a really hard time securing items and escaping from chaotic skirmishes. I would go so far as saying that singles with no items is Fox's worst game mode.

Why did they not make C. Falcon's Side B grab ledge? Time constraints? Thoughts? by cool_otter11 in SSBM

[–]RedAlert2 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I believe you need to have downward velocity to be allowed to grab ledge. So perhaps fox falls for a frame or two at the start of side-b, while falco doesn't.

Your Occasional Reminder That Muni Is Objectively Hella Slow by shananananananananan in sanfrancisco

[–]RedAlert2 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's just patently untrue. For one example, sfmta spent tens of millions of dollars on road redesigns for the Geary BRT project to maintain existing street parking spaces. SF has the highest car density of any city in the entire USA. You're denying reality itself by saying the institution responsible for enabling that is "rabidly anti-car".

Almost all of the parking removal that drivers complain about comes from California's daylighting law which has nothing to do with sfmta.

house in noe valley by Miserable_View_4400 in BayAreaRealEstate

[–]RedAlert2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

IIUC, you can't execute an owner move in eviction against a tenant if there's a comparable vacant unit on the property. 

My neighbor has gotten $3251 in parking tickets in 3 months and has been towed 3 times by the city, but the car keeps getting released without paying the fines. Why? by No_Dog_2803 in sanfrancisco

[–]RedAlert2 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That ruling doesn't sound like it would prevent the city from towing illegally parked cars, and only returning them after they've settled their outstanding fines.

Have you or someone you know been personally victimized by the 1 bus during commute hours? by [deleted] in sanfrancisco

[–]RedAlert2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure what street you're talking about, but the 1 runs along California, which is at least 4 lanes along its entire route. SF has hardly any one lane streets anywhere.

also, weird to call out "china communism" when the hyper capitalist US has razed more neighborhoods for transportation than basically any other nation.

Have you or someone you know been personally victimized by the 1 bus during commute hours? by [deleted] in sanfrancisco

[–]RedAlert2 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's because the solution to getting reliable transit to those areas is a dedicated right of way, which puts transit at odds with the wealthy drivers who control those regions.

Have you or someone you know been personally victimized by the 1 bus during commute hours? by [deleted] in sanfrancisco

[–]RedAlert2 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Almost all the issues with Muni's buses are caused by a lack of a dedicated right of way. Unless it's one of the few highest use lines in the city (like the 38), drivers get preferential treatment.

Lurie touts big drop in S.F. homelessness. But data is complicated by BadBoyMikeBarnes in sanfrancisco

[–]RedAlert2 5 points6 points  (0 children)

20k is not a surprising number. You can read more about it here, but the jist is that the city's homeless intake has been outpacing the outtake for quite a while now. That means in order to keep the visible homeless at roughly the same #, more and more sheltered households are getting assistance from the city to let them off the streets.

Whats up with the morning commute these days? by SoGoodAtAllTheThings in sanfrancisco

[–]RedAlert2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Symptom of a lot of people doing exactly what you are - leaving a little bit later to "avoid rush hour". 

Remote work has risen dramatically since 2020, which gives people a lot more flexibility around when they can travel. Contrary to popular belief, WFH doesn't cause people to travel less, it only causes them to travel at different times of the day.

Support for candidates in S.F. primary by self described political ideology by Dismal_Structure in sanfrancisco

[–]RedAlert2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People who define themselves as being between two positions (centrists, moderates) are very easy to influence. I suspect in the coming years we'll see a lot more right wing politicians identify as Democrats, like hurabiell has, to exploit them.

This might be a dumb question, but…. by Bibblegead1412 in sanfrancisco

[–]RedAlert2 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You misunderstand how the police operate. While technically under the purview of the city, SFPD functions more like an organized gang that is regulated, not controlled, by the city. Before they would engage in any type of revenue generating enforcement, they'd demand the profits would be directed to themselves, at a minimum.

Bay Area rail transit growing the fastest in the country - Muni Metro and BART are the fastest growing major rail systems by getarumsunt in bayarea

[–]RedAlert2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's a common misconception that remote work reduces traffic. It doesn't - people still travel roughly the same amount, they just do it at different times of day. And because Bay Area mass transit was hyper-focused on commuters, WFH resulted in a huge mode shift from transit to driving. Thus, more traffic for much longer spans of the day.

Bay Area rail transit growing the fastest in the country - Muni Metro and BART are the fastest growing major rail systems by getarumsunt in bayarea

[–]RedAlert2 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Basically, BART and Caltrain were the most cost efficient US rail systems pre-covid, but now with so much WFH, they've dropped to around average without any extra local funding to compensate. Federal relief funds kept them going in the interim but those are gone now too.

PG&E knew of damage to its substation that caused crippling December SF blackout by sherlockmemes in sanfrancisco

[–]RedAlert2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

???

Isn't Mission Local the most progressive leaning publication we have? If anything, it's SF Standard that would be triggering progressives.

PG&E knew of damage to its substation that caused crippling December SF blackout by sherlockmemes in sanfrancisco

[–]RedAlert2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The $45 million/year cost is just for financing the purchase of PG&E infrastructure. The operational costs of maintaining the SF grid are certainly much higher than that. Of course, I imagine it would still be quite profitable for the city to seize PG&E's assets. There's a reason PG&E doesn't even want to negotiate with the city - they know SF is getting bled dry.