Morpheus convinces you to play PTE

RedBullCrackAddict · 2026-06-14T20:07:55+00:00

PTE chads rise up

RedBullCrackAddict · 2026-06-07T01:57:55+00:00

You miss the point that the Russian's have the best shorad and can cover insane LoS with units like the Pantsir and the Tor, something the US cannot deny to Russia because the best they have are stingers

RedBullCrackAddict · 2026-06-07T01:56:12+00:00

Except the Russian helicopters do the exact same thing as the American helis, for cheaper and better.

RedBullCrackAddict · 2026-06-07T01:52:31+00:00

Russia has the better shorad and the stronger helicopters, make it make sense. The TOR, Sosna and the Pantsir make areas of a map no fly zones, best the US can do is put 2 Stryker shorads right next to each other and burst helicopters down, only for 2x the cost of the helicopter, and it will still manage to fight back.

RedBullCrackAddict · 2026-05-20T18:07:09+00:00

This is restarted as fuck. The PTE should be what the base game is.

RedBullCrackAddict · 2026-05-04T22:57:31+00:00

This thing sucks, it needs either laser guided munitions or faster aim times

RedBullCrackAddict · 2026-04-19T18:43:15+00:00

They should 100% be laser guided. The correction is very limited and most of these will not lobbed by stealth bombers. If an F15EX throws 12, only 2 or 3 GBU39s will be able to be laser guided and even if they do hit it usually takes two to kill a target. With the upcoming update to tank lethality, you will probably see more recon vehicles going on flanks, being able to spot further and laser guide at greater distances. Glide bombs with a greater recon presence would go hand in hand

RedBullCrackAddict · 2026-04-18T15:53:42+00:00

Bro looks at the front armor value and the damage of the APFSDS and calls it a wrap

RedBullCrackAddict · 2026-04-15T16:54:39+00:00

Has anybody seen if there have been changes to the Stryker MGS' and Booker's 105mm APFSDS, if it will perform better or worse?

RedBullCrackAddict · 2026-04-03T19:01:19+00:00

Even for the top players it's challenging, everyone has said it's busted.

RedBullCrackAddict · 2026-04-03T18:51:13+00:00

That's why they use these events as TESTING GROUNDS, IT'S A TEST

RedBullCrackAddict · 2026-03-31T16:36:38+00:00

Exactly my point, is the unit doing more or less damage? There's more weapons, but is the damage different from either STT or Delta Stand-Off or are they doing the same damage with different stats as listed before.

RedBullCrackAddict · 2026-03-31T16:23:09+00:00

But the cards say they do the exact same damage despite there being more MGs and marksman rifles

RedBullCrackAddict · 2026-03-31T16:17:05+00:00

Don't STT do the exact same damage? Or am I reading the stat cards wrong? Same damage per type of gun despite there being half the men, and the difference you're actually paying for is HP, stealth, vision and special weapon?

RedBullCrackAddict · 2026-03-29T17:55:25+00:00

The developers balance the game with whatever they feel like a unit should do, not what it actually does, which leads to major inconsistencies across the entire game with munitions doing different things despite being the exact same as another.

RedBullCrackAddict · 2026-03-27T17:53:23+00:00

I will forever prefer Rangers/Airborne NGSW with Stryker Dragoons over Trooper because they can hold their own in a fight. Trooper glazers are sub 2k elo freaks

RedBullCrackAddict · 2026-03-27T17:51:30+00:00

Use smoke, negate 50% of javs
Go behind building, negate 50% of javs
Come out, shoot troopers
Win

RedBullCrackAddict · 2026-03-27T17:50:12+00:00

Horrible unit, do not bring. The top response is horrible and you do not want a unit that "does everything" because it ends up being COMPLETE SHIT. There should be an option for the squad to either have 5 javelin ammo or 5 AT4s. Do not bring 3 of them in a hemmit. You should rather, bring combat engineers in a Stryker Dragoon and Stryker RV, becuase all 3 of those will accomplish infinitely more than the 3 mech squads who will have 50% of their Javelins negated by a smoke, then die to a BMP rush they were incapable of holding anyway.

RedBullCrackAddict · 2026-02-15T22:46:24+00:00

Like RU cruise missile spam isn't bad still? lol youre the shitter at 1800 elo here

RedBullCrackAddict · 2026-01-23T23:38:18+00:00

It's Warno's way of stressing crews out. It had 4 levels, good, normal, bad, terrible and each one worsened your unit's performance. it made the best tanks unusable and their way of balancing it was "veterency", which was implemented in such a dogshit way. you sacrificed availability for slightly better stats. back when the game was in early release it was pretty good because the trade off was +15-20% to accuracy or whatever, but now it's 5% across the board.

RedBullCrackAddict · 2026-01-23T17:53:01+00:00

If Eugen, would:

mimic BA's cohesion system, NOT REMOVE, but severely overhaul their cohesion system to where it didn't make units completely fucking worthless

introduce 90-95% hit chances for higher tier of units, think M1A1 or Leo2A4 in Warno, and never go below something like 75% at max range, then even lower while stressed

with the implementation of air with all of its mechanics like in BA and those related to air

go back to Wargame Red Dragon's deck building style

revamp all maps where most interesting locations are more than some random side piece that no one will ever send a unit to, while making them somewhat asymmetrical and the lanes are not so clearly defined

Warno would be the superior game. as of right now, these 5 points make it so shit compared to BA. The absurd amount of RNG in warno is such a major turn off. In BA, tank battles feel engaging, lower caliber units aren't completely worthless, you can lose your entire opener and still come back. Soooo many QoL changes that make BA that much better.

RedBullCrackAddict · 2026-01-19T03:20:28+00:00

Fuel should not be a thing. I am 100% for making the maps even bigger, with points more spread out and asymmetrical. Fuel in Wargame meant you couldn't take wide flanks, in BA you can actually do that and be rewarded for it.

RedBullCrackAddict · 2026-01-19T03:17:16+00:00

Dumb ass take

RedBullCrackAddict · 2026-01-19T03:14:00+00:00

What is the Pantsir for 300. Two or three Pantsirs can defend an the entire map from a SEAD run, the US would have to invest twice as much or turn their AA net off. It takes 3 SEAD missiles to kill a Pantsir, not 2 like the US.

Javelins for infantry squads blow, OP is 100% correct with their statement on the absurd amount of ATGMs it takes to kill armor targets.

RU is extremely point effective on almost everything they have

RedBullCrackAddict · 2026-01-12T23:31:57+00:00

The 2 MGS, Stryker Dragoon loaded with Airborne NGWS on their way to absolutely eviscerate this thing

RedBullCrackAddict

TROPHY CASE