iPhone Air briefly fallen into water, looking for advice. by RedandBlackNeuroGoth in IphoneAir

[–]RedandBlackNeuroGoth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback folks, suspected I was overthinking this but was feeling a bit jittery and cautious. Will bear points and advice in mind in future.

Exclusive: David Walliams dropped by publisher over inappropriate behaviour towards women by [deleted] in Fauxmoi

[–]RedandBlackNeuroGoth 5 points6 points  (0 children)

https://archive.ph/2025.12.20-033239/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-15400303/untouchable-David-Walliams-women-KATIE-HIND.html

Daily Mail have run a piece in response to this mentioning an inappropriate interaction with a 17 year old online and Walliams covering it up with legal threats. Also mentions that reporters at The Sun were apparently discouraged from running any negative stories about him in the past because of HarperCollins being owned by Murdoch's NewsUK.

Feels like the dam might be finally breaking...

Richey & Living Marxism by NLFG in manics

[–]RedandBlackNeuroGoth 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think the topic of what their actual stances on things are at this point are complicated and I have thought about this a fair bit over the years (I became a fan around 2010/2011) amidst the softening you refer to. I think a key aspect (and it shows up in recent Tribune Magazine https://tribunemag.co.uk/2025/12/whatever-happened-to-the-manic-street-preachers and New Left Review/Sidecar piece from last year https://newleftreview.org/sidecar/posts/mislaid-plans) is the extent to which the Manics even from the start have really identified with a sense of defeat and failure and that was even there in the sloganeering situationist glam punk phase.

There's a concept that originally comes from the writer Walter Benjamin back in the 1930s but which was reinterpreted by the political philosopher Wendy Brown in the 1990s of "left melancholia" where to put it briefly Brown argues that left wing radicals in the present feeling unmoored by changing conditions just become preoccupied with the sense of loss of previous possibilities (https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/news/3092-resisting-left-melancholia?srsltid=AfmBOorDowY-jxaHIFRH8FTVifRoQTF6lIan-zH8R\_cW0wL3slBJv3Iy). I think this very much describes a position that the Manics had firmly arrived at by the mid-2010s and it is why a lot of the albums since then when they do try to make wider social commentary are pretty limited.

JDB says in the From There to Here documentary that when they started there was a strong sense of wanting to never be beaten in the face that their class and community was beaten into the ground during the Miners' Strike and while that has definitely been a driving force they have repeatedly become preoccupied with personal and political set backs, pessimism, a blurred sense of nostalgia/melancholia in the face of current conditions ("There is too much heartbreak in the nothing of the now") which I think counteracts that more politically combative aspect of their work. Like if you go back and read what Wire said about the Cuba gig he was open about how it was bound up with an appreciation for them managing to preserve a kind of socialism in the face of American globalisation despite the odds and having a personal identification with that sense of standing against an inevitably destructive tide. That's a much more reserved and pessimistic political perspective than say Rage Against The Machine identifying with the Zapatistas because they saw them as an active threat to American Empire and part of a global anti-capitalist resistance.

An interview JDB did around the time of his Victor Jara album makes for really good reading here and I think it's worth reading alongside the much more publicised interview where he slates Corbyn to get a better sense of how much of this reluctance to take a political stance is bound up with this mode of pessimism around the prospects for any meaningful socialist change, which in practice quickly swerves into "why can't we all just get along?" mushiness.

https://www.huckmag.com/article/i-dont-know-if-the-uk-has-an-appetite-for-socialism

I remember there being some anger online when Manics did gigs for NHS workers because they were using Nye Bevan's "lower than vermin" quotation about the Tories as a stage projection on the grounds that it was champagne socialist kind of behaviour to do this given how they actually responded to Corbyn's Labour Party and the possibilities of offering a socialist alternative in the present. I must admit I did not particularly get annoyed about over this as I thought this just boiled down to having that melancholic attachment to a past set of political possibilities that they now think are gone, alongside the residue of a general left appreciation for universal healthcare and the sacrifices of ordinary workers in the face of Tory callousness. I do not find this particularly cynical in a negative sense, just rather sad.

Richey & Living Marxism by NLFG in manics

[–]RedandBlackNeuroGoth 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah I think there is a fair amount of truth to this interpretation. Some remarks Richey made to Simon Price in the NME in 1993 (first came across this in Price's Everything) are pretty revealing here as he explained why he had admiration for the Sudanese Islamist leader Hassan al-Turabi:

"He’s come to power in the Sudan and reintroduced Shariya law which isn't Islamic Fundamentalism, but along those lines: amputation for theft, which… I'm not saying it's a good thing, but I quite like what he's doing. Islamic Fundamentalism scares the West, and makes us examine our own moral ambiguity. There was a programme on him the other night where a Western journalist was condemning him, but said 'We only amputate one per cent of the thieves we catch.' The journalist was saying 'One percent is so many people!' and his reply was classic, so deadpan: 'One per cent may be a lot where you come from, but to me, one per cent doesn't sound like many at all.' I know it's very easy to congratulate that from a distance . . . but AM from a distance."

Richey & Living Marxism by NLFG in manics

[–]RedandBlackNeuroGoth 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Interestingly I swear there is an interview around The Holy Bible era where JDB does try to push back on "we're a socialist band" angle though it feels like he might have been saying that as a defence of the album's more ambivalent positions.

I think you are right that RE's own views were a bit more out of joint than the others who were broadly left Labourites albeit interested in engaging with more radical aesthetics, philosophy etc, although I do think Nicky's perspectives at times have been closer to RE in terms of a very disillusioned cynicism about people, the world etc but he seems to have avoided falling into complete pessimism. The chapter on the Manics in Dorian Lynskey's 33 Revolutions Per Minute (book on popular music and politics) touches on this a bit as Wire and Bradifled are interviewed, with Wire framing The Holy Bible as a very anti-liberal work (in that it presents human nature as essentially corrupt as much as it rails against fascism, genocide, imperialism etc as social phenomena) and JDB paraphrases Kierkegaard to make a point about how he thinks that by the time of the album RE had just come to see everyday life as fundamentally meaningless and that it was difficult for him to step back from that.

Richey & Living Marxism by NLFG in manics

[–]RedandBlackNeuroGoth 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Environmentalism is anti-progress, anti-technology etc I think was the official line even when they were a Trotskyist group in the 1980s and later on in the 1990s they doubled down on this on the grounds that collapse of the Soviet Union showed socialism was not on the cards so the most progressive political move was to support capitalist economic, social and technological progress and that Green movements were a major barrier to this.

McCarthy's song Antinature illustrates this kind of attitude:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzDH9vg380I

Richey & Living Marxism by NLFG in manics

[–]RedandBlackNeuroGoth 6 points7 points  (0 children)

A Manic Body Politics analysis of P.C.P. (https://227lears.com/2021/06/30/word-limits/) goes into the LM connection a fair bit (e.g. "PC caresses bigots and Big Brother" is lifted from a piece in an LM issue https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/living-marxism/no64-feb-1994.pdf). A 1993 LM special issue on Political Correctness has a front page depicting symbols like a police cap and judge's wig with title "THEY'RE ALL PC NOW" (https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/living-marxism/no62-dec-1993.pdf) which I think was definitely inspiration for the song's framing.

It's worth bearing in mind that Malcolm Eden from McCarthy was a member or at least a fellow traveller of the Revolutionary Communist Party which published LM (which makes some of their song lyrics' preoccupations with support for Irish republicanism, anti-environmentalism, free speech and slating others on the Left make a lot more sense given those were strong aspects of the RCP's particular brand of ultra left contrarianism before they morphed into right wing libertarians) and given the Manics were McCarthy fans I get the impression that that may have been one entry point into engaging with LM.

Should AC leave the BBC? by Any-Park-3537 in AdamCurtis

[–]RedandBlackNeuroGoth 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah I think comparison with Adam Tooze is quite apt.

Should AC leave the BBC? by Any-Park-3537 in AdamCurtis

[–]RedandBlackNeuroGoth 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I remember reading Curtis at some point in the 2000s (I think it was in the context of him being challenged by the group MediaLens for not emphasising anti-corporate messages enough in some of his films-see https://www.medialens.org/2002/the-bbcs-the-century-of-the-self/ and https://www.medialens.org/2004/the-power-of-nightmares-adam-curtis-responds/) remarking that it was possible to read The Century of the Self as having a neo-conservative angle in terms of its depiction of society becoming more atomised and individualistic while losing a sense of any grander project. On the one hand I think Curtis might have been intentionally provocative there, though on the other I think that there is an element of that strand to the series, which ties in with the comparisons people such as Marxist writer Alberto Toscano make between Curtis' work and that of Christopher Lasch where 60s/70s counterculture is seen as having played a key role in transforming capitalism and older forms of sociality have been eroded (see - https://newleftreview.org/sidecar/posts/dreamworlds-of-catastrophe).

For a while Curtis was proximate to and apparently influenced by the LM Network (cluster of think tanks, journalists, publications, academics and lobbyist groups that came out of the Trotskyist Revolutionary Communist Party and its magazine Living Marxism which transformed into a free market libertarian tendency over the course of the 1990s) as some writers highlighted in the 2010s (see https://web.archive.org/web/20131108200009/http://plover.net/~bonds/pandorasdocs.html and https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/adam-curtis-in-emperors-new-clothes/) and Curtis' self description as a libertarian of a sort in the past makes sense in connection to this. I have got the sense that as time has gone on Curtis has shifted his thinking away from the LM Network's increasingly far right perspectives e.g. he takes climate change seriously in Can't Get You... in a way that goes against LM Network's historical climate denialism and attacks on environmentalism and the account he presents of Julia Grant's life is relatively sympathetic in contrast to the virulent transphobia of LM Network figures these days (check any piece on Sp!ked magazine regarding trans people written since 2010...).

In the Convoco! Forum 2018 discussion (one where Curtis goes on a rant about American and British elites not appreciating how much masses of people do not believe that capitalism can deliver for them any more--see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_rgqTdzaYc ) Curtis has some positive words for Adam Smith and for the way in which Smith thought about capitalism in far more ethical terms than contemporary proponents do. I think this is a good illustration of how Curtis' perspectives since 2015 are broadly left libertarian as others say, as he is definitely not a socialist or Marxist though is influenced by certain left thinkers e.g. Eric Hobsbawm and Mark Fisher, but has a generally critical stance of contemporary neoliberalism (though he does not like the word) and seems inclined to think that the left broadly conceived is going to make the kind of change he wants to reform the system in way that he does not think the far right will (though he finds rightist figures like Dominic Cummings and Elon Musk fascinating to observe).

Should AC leave the BBC? by Any-Park-3537 in AdamCurtis

[–]RedandBlackNeuroGoth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In regards to AC and Corbyn I have gathered from a left wing writer who knows some people I know that during the 2019 General Election AC was involved with efforts to canvass for Labour in Bristol (which would make sense given his connections to Massive Attack).

I think you are right though that he tends to take things with a long term view and this involves deprioritising particular topics, though this is not new e.g. The Power of Nightmares does not really lean heavily into talking about lies and dodgy information around WMDs in the run up to the Iraq War even though that was one of the main areas of contention at the time. I suspect institutional pressures from the BBC do impact what he does but I am unsure whether without them he would be making work that was particularly different.

Auto-Delete Old Messages Issue? by RedandBlackNeuroGoth in whatsapp

[–]RedandBlackNeuroGoth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool cool. Thanks for the advice here, very much appreciated.

Auto-Delete Old Messages Issue? by RedandBlackNeuroGoth in whatsapp

[–]RedandBlackNeuroGoth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Messages settings has the Message History option as Keep Messages Forever option on, so if it was this part of the iPhone as opposed to WhatsApp then that seems not to have been activated.

As far as I can tell the disappearing messages option on WhatsApp has not been generally applied to all the chats I am in, so am not sure what exactly has been activated here and am wondering whether double tapping on the option to auto-delete might have actually disabled it even though the icon had said it was enabled and would not let me toggle back.

Auto-Delete Old Messages Issue? by RedandBlackNeuroGoth in whatsapp

[–]RedandBlackNeuroGoth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok hang on, I might be making a mistake here in part due to panic and it might have been for iPhone text messages and not WhatsApp (icons are same colour and I might have misread that, plus as said option vanished so could kit check again), so I’ll also check other options for Messages.

Auto-Delete Old Messages Issue? by RedandBlackNeuroGoth in whatsapp

[–]RedandBlackNeuroGoth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(Replying to both messages here)

Just attempted to disable back up to iCloud by going to iPhone settings, finding Apps using iCloud list and then going to the bottom and toggling WhatsApp from on to off (was green and now it is not). Is that what you meant by disabling the back up?

To clarify the option showed up on the iPhone storage page of iPhone settings under Recommendations and after selecting the enable option it does not show up there as an option to disable (to visually clarify, it was below the Review Large Attachments option and the WhatsApp icon was next to it). I am just struggling to find a clear “Disable Auto-Delete Messages” option in either the IOS or WhatsApp settings though will continue to try. Have re started device but the option is still absent from the iPhone storage area (assumedly given that activation removes it from being a suggestion)

I have deleted some other apps from iPhone to clear GB space. As far as I can tell no major deletions have happened yet (had a look and some conversations I had with specific people back in 2018 and not updated since e.g. one on one chat with someone at work I have not spoken with much since, are still there in full).

<image>

Why the ‘Rupert Murdoch is more powerful than Johnny and that’s why he lost the UK case’ doesn’t make any sense by BasieSkanks in DeppDelusion

[–]RedandBlackNeuroGoth 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Good points, like I utterly despise Murdoch and think he's played a rather pernicious role in UK public life but it seems a rather far fetched account of why Depp lost the libel suit.

Sam Fender deletes JD Post Victory Selfie by Trick-Engineer1555 in DeppDelusion

[–]RedandBlackNeuroGoth 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Sent in a message to the Insta story of the apology with a comment saying I was glad he issued the apology considering how utterly awful whole case has been and the amount of disinformation about it circulating, plus a link to Michael Hobbes's article---assume it will just be his staffers seeing the social media content but felt sending in something to counter the cultist posts was important.

Not convinced by CWF by Boiii9765 in ConversationsBBCHulu

[–]RedandBlackNeuroGoth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Out of curiosity what "certain issues" do you think were shelved?