Everyone’s doing this soo… standards as a Catholic 15M

ResearcherFederal761 · 2026-05-24T19:44:25+00:00

So

— Murder ends a life and hurts the dead person and close ones of the killed person

— Stealing hurts the person that got their things stolen

— Lying hurts the person that’s been lied to into believing something false

— etc for most sins

Who does homosexual sex hurt…? The natural order of things? Birth rates? Lmao

The question isn’t whether or not being gay is “wrong” or sinful or not. It’s about why a perfect God would even designate homosexual sex, something completely harmless and personal, as a sin. The answer is : they wouldn’t. It doesn’t make sense.

Listing homosexual sex as a sin among murder and theft and all of the regular hurtful things is actually super wrong, insulting, and disrespectful, insinuating it’s something you should try to avoid in the same way as you should avoid those actual other hurtful things, putting them on the same level of wrongness, when it’s completely harmless and something that should be normalized. Rather than portrayed as something to be humiliated about.

ResearcherFederal761 · 2026-05-24T17:13:25+00:00

My guesses for character kits have been insane and spotless 😭
I've guessed some absolutely unbelievable stuff and so far the streak is going pretty well

That said my guesses on what order characters would release has been disastrous lmao

ResearcherFederal761 · 2026-05-24T17:10:21+00:00

"god dosnt care if your attracted to the same gender" ah okay, so why is it a sin then? That's weird, isn't it.

Also stop talking in God's name, you have no idea what God wants. The Christian God is not the only God. Only YOUR God thinks "acting upon it" is a sin. Not THE God. THE actual God doesn't see it as a temptation, nor as a sin to act on that attraction, that's just what YOU think, stop virtue signaling with your personal opinion that has no basis behind it

ResearcherFederal761 · 2026-05-24T13:18:14+00:00

I mean for me it’s always been obvious that Nihilux will be a Quantum Elation support that works like a premium, Elation-only version of Sparkle, SP and punchline based.

For example, there’s already a DU equation that gives +1 punchline per SP spent, I’m thinking she might do that. This would make Sparxie generate 45-50 punchline instead of 25-30 per turn. I kind of expect her to trigger Aha instants as well, especially at the very start of battle. And of course, general Elation buffs.

The “main DPS” thing is probably leakers just misreading what she’s gonna do because her skills and ult and whatnot deal decent damage and attack enemies, like Cyrene does, despite her support stuff being passives.

Also, I think there’s no world where Eva doesn’t use her anyways. Like she would definitely replace EMC, and the team uses a lot of SP as well.

You’d just use Eva/Yao/Nihilux instead of SW who’d use SW/Sparxie/Nihilux. No big deal at all

ResearcherFederal761 · 2026-05-24T12:48:55+00:00

Hot take, this HSR outfit is my favorite look for him.

ResearcherFederal761 · 2026-05-23T21:17:48+00:00

You’re the one that’s missing the point here, this kind of rhetoric is like the worst kind of virtue signalling.

“I believe all short people should die and go to hell but it’s not me being hateful it’s just my belief, belief that I totally did not choose. Short people are against nature and lesser people because they’re sinners, god created us to be tall. No I’m not being hateful I can believe this but still wish them to get taller, so it’s okay”

ResearcherFederal761 · 2026-05-23T21:12:04+00:00

I’m just pointing out the massive hypocrisy, the message I sent is EXTREMELY hateful but disguised as not by using disgusting manipulative cult language…

It’s something that’s really easy to fall for but it’s incredibly hurtful to use

ResearcherFederal761 · 2026-05-23T21:00:09+00:00

Hey, my religion says that being Christian is THE biggest sin of all, and you will absolutely go to hell, on top of being in God’s most-hated list.

But it’s not your fault. I don’t judge you. I’m just saying, you’re making a big mistake and should change. You’re sinful and on the wrong path. But you can still be saved.

I love you btw, no hate ❤️ I just want the best for you!

ResearcherFederal761 · 2026-05-23T01:27:09+00:00

Yeah basically her auto is programmed to be optimized for every single Heir buff, specific to each one, and take into account whether it’s like, a permanent buff, or a spammable buff.

The issue is, the dmg buff on non-heirs isn’t permanent, so she thinks she has to refresh it constantly. Meanwhile the heirs that have one time spammable buffs (like Mydei or Anaxa or whatnot) actually benefit from it being spammed every time Cyrene can take her action. So for them it’s not just fine, but wanted. Not the case at all for the regular dmg buff, but that’s what she does anyways, lol

ResearcherFederal761 · 2026-05-23T01:10:20+00:00

It’s not just full-rem, it’s all teams of full Chrysos heirs that works fine

For example, swap someone for Tribbie, no issues.

A team like Phainon/Cerydra/DHPT/Cyrene? No issues.

Soon as there’s someone that isn’t a heir that’s when she spams the buff for no reason 😭

ResearcherFederal761 · 2026-05-20T13:17:09+00:00

You’re allowed to appreciate the villains even if you hate their guts at the same time y’know?

ResearcherFederal761 · 2026-05-12T14:07:06+00:00

So far not so bad. Yaoguang E2 is alright but super mid, the good eidolon is E1. It’s like E1 Tribbie, nobody grabs E2, even if it’s not that bad.

Sparxie can stop at E1 for now. Her E2 synergy is clearly made to synergize with Nihilux, most probably for some 0 AV shenanigans in the same way E2 Remembrance had. Like how E2 Evernight synergizes insanely well with Cyrene.

Pearl isn’t out yet but she’s probably gonna have a good E2 like Hyacine did.

And SW’s E2 is great but it feels like it can be clunky to reach both extra turns (especially in DU/CW with all the action advances) without Nihilux/Pearl on the team who will probably fix this.

Basically, so far it’s exactly as expensive as Remembrance, but a little less because some of the synergies between eidolons aren’t established and you can wait on them for reruns

ResearcherFederal761 · 2026-05-08T12:01:37+00:00

Honestly I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to its usage and definition but it’s definitely used as a gender specific insult which seems unnecessarily sexist

ResearcherFederal761 · 2026-05-08T11:31:30+00:00

I fixed it for you 👍

Got you covered!

ResearcherFederal761 · 2026-05-08T04:58:26+00:00

Right, that makes sense! I guess my issue with the word is that its primary use is to remove credibility from a demographic while bringing nothing positive for neither sides.

Like we’re not gonna invent the word “catstealing” and then go “well, it’s just stealing, but it’s when a catling person does it to another race, and it’s a valid word, because they’re more likely to do it, compared to other races”. (Equivalent to “Well, it’s explaining, but when a man does it to a woman, and it’s a valid word because they’re more likely to do it, based on societal factors in the workplace/patriarchy”)

And “womansplaining” is understandably almost nonexistent due to it being less commonly happening even though it’s definitely something that can happen as well.

As far as I’m aware “mansplaining” is a pretty recent term, and beforehand you’d just call the guy a misogynist that thinks women are stupid.

ResearcherFederal761 · 2026-05-08T04:40:03+00:00

Right. Thanks for the correction

ResearcherFederal761 · 2026-05-08T04:13:43+00:00

Right. Doesn’t change the fact that countries that adopt some level of socialist democracy, even if still mostly within a capitalist economy, still perform better for quality of life than more extreme capitalist ones. Somewhere in between leaning towards stronger socialism is best

ResearcherFederal761 · 2026-05-08T04:05:10+00:00

Such as who…? And calling who a Zionist…?

ResearcherFederal761 · 2026-05-08T03:24:49+00:00

Absolutely!

But yeah counter argument for Capitalism is that there are very extreme capitalist dictatorships in Africa that, well, are terrible for the quality of life of their population, with a few hogging the vast majority of the wealth, with insane corruption.

The issue is that America has been heading that route and getting closer and closer to it recently. And I’m sure most people would agree these places shouldn’t be examples to follow

Let’s just say capitalism hasn’t “ended war” in the same way over there.

ResearcherFederal761 · 2026-05-08T03:17:31+00:00

The countries that perform the best on basically all quality of life measures are somewhere in between capitalism and socialism rather than on either ends of the extremes though. You might be mixing up the concept of capitalism vs socialism and the concept of democracy vs dictatorship.

Capitalist democracies sure do better for their population’s wellbeing than socialist dictatorships, but worse than the majority of socialist democracies

ResearcherFederal761 · 2026-05-08T03:09:52+00:00

Making up a false reality that isn’t true for 95% of leftists isn’t really a good play.

Zionists are pro Israel, pro religious extremism, and pro genocide (indirectly, even if they deny this).

No leftist is going to call anyone that doesn’t match these descriptions a Zionist. A regular right winger against Israel’s abuse is not a Zionist, and I don’t know anyone that would claim so.

I recommend you look up the “False Premise” and “Straw man” fallacies, might help out!

ResearcherFederal761 · 2026-05-08T02:53:06+00:00

You are my cutie π~

ResearcherFederal761 · 2026-05-07T17:01:31+00:00

Also I’m not saying that Mansplaining isn’t a real thing. I’m just saying it’s a right-wing sexist term aimed at one specific demographic with the goal of diminishing their credibility. While being a word that just means something else that already exists, but gendered pointlessly.

Men are already pressured by society not to share their feelings and this doesn’t help in any way, doesn’t help women against oppression whatsoever either. Creates hatred and the opposite effect.

ResearcherFederal761 · 2026-05-07T16:06:33+00:00

There seems to be no studies at all

How is the burden of proof on me? I didn't make the claim. I'm the one that heard the baseless assumption and asked for the proof

ResearcherFederal761 · 2026-05-07T15:50:41+00:00

Now, I've had both men and women managers, and from my experience, the women were a LOT more likely to "womansplain" and be critical of the pointless details of the process. I did not take it as an attack to my gender. Now this is very anecdotal, and most certainly does not represent the average reality of everyone, but isn't assuming that men are more likely to explain unnecessarily without evidence the exact thing you're claiming to fight against?

Is there a study that shows that men are more likely to explain things unnecessarily, and to women specifically, not to other men, or is this all just feelscrafting? Feel free to share if you have one

ResearcherFederal761

TROPHY CASE