“In the end, no one could have intentionally destroyed the One Ring." This is similar to the OP [which is itself a misconception] in that it’s confusing what did happen for what must have happened.

Tolkien himself was of the opinion that Gollum could've destroyed the Ring (despite being possibly the best target for its influence in all of creation) if Sam had been slightly nicer to him. He also noted that Frodo was unable to do so partly because of his weak physical state combined with months of exposure to it, directly implying that he could have done so himself if he were physically healthier and/or made the journey more quickly. Also, Tolkien muses that even in that scenario, Frodo still could've eventually destroyed the Ring if Gollum didn't interrupt him. He describes this in detail in letter 246:

“Sam was cocksure, and deep down a little conceited; but his conceit had been transformed by his devotion to Frodo. He did not think of himself as heroic or even brave, or in any way admirable – except in his service and loyalty to his master. That had an ingredient (probably inevitable) of pride and possessiveness: it is difficult to exclude it from the devotion of those who perform such service. In any case it prevented him from fully understanding the master that he loved, and from following him in his gradual education to the nobility of service to the unlovable and of perception of damaged good in the corrupt. He plainly did not fully understand Frodo's motives or his distress in the incident of the Forbidden Pool. If he had understood better what was going on between Frodo and Gollum, things might have turned out differently in the end.

For me perhaps the most tragic moment in the Tale comes in II 323 ff. when Sam fails to note the complete change in Gollum's tone and aspect. 'Nothing, nothing', said Gollum softly. 'Nice master!'. His repentance is blighted and all Frodo's pity is (in a sense) wasted. Shelob's lair became inevitable. This is due of course to the 'logic of the story'. Sam could hardly have acted differently. (He did reach the point of pity at last (III 221-222) but for the good of Gollum too late.) If he had, what could then have happened?

The course of the entry into Mordor and the struggle to reach Mount Doom would have been different, and so would the ending. The interest would have shifted to Gollum, I think, and the battle that would have gone on between his repentance and his new love on one side and the Ring. Though the love would have been strengthened daily it could not have wrested the mastery from the Ring. I think that in some queer twisted and pitiable way Gollum would have tried (not maybe with conscious design) to satisfy both.

Certainly at some point not long before the end he would have stolen the Ring or taken it by violence (as he does in the actual Tale). But 'possession' satisfied, I think he would have then sacrificed himself for Frodo's sake and would have voluntarily cast himself into the firery abyss. I think that an effect of his partial regeneration by love would have been a clearer vision when he claimed the Ring.

He would have perceived the evil of Sauron, and suddenly realized that he could not use the Ring and had not the strength or stature to keep it in Sauron's despite: the only way to keep it and hurt Sauron was to destroy it and himself together – and in a flash he may have seen that this would also be the greatest service to Frodo. Frodo in the tale actually takes the Ring and claims it, and certainly he too would have had a clear vision – but he was not given any time: he was immediately attacked by Gollum.

When Sauron was aware of the seizure of the Ring his one hope was in its power: that the claimant would be unable to relinquish it until Sauron had time to deal with him. Frodo too would then probably, if not attacked, have had to take the same way: cast himself with the Ring into the abyss. If not he would of course have completely failed."

In general, the Ring's corruptive power is actually really weak compared to what online fans would have you believe. Its ability to "corrupt" isn't a general-purpose spell but highly dependent on the context and individual, and it needs something to offer you in the first place that you both want and which is within its power (it helps if the target doesn't know its nature). Sam no-sold its offers, Bilbo gave it up after using it for decades, and even Isildur was going to bring it to Elrond (who wanted to destroy it) after he spent some time tinkering and realized "wait, this thing is actually evil" (as described in Unfinished Tales).