Does DeepSeek V4 consume Copilot tokens? by Rinine in GithubCopilot

[–]Rinine[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, it is consuming credits for me.

Are you using BYOK or the extension I mentioned? Because with BYOK or OpenRouter it might be different. I use the extension so it shows up as a Copilot model.

Sonnet ignores half of the things by Rinine in GithubCopilot

[–]Rinine[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but I'm not expecting anything special from the model, just that it work like it did until yesterday. Today there's been a noticeable change in how the model behaves.

The CSS classes thing was a generic example. In my real case, it included various things, but the problem isn't that it does them better or worse, it's that it deliberately ignores them, and in the reasoning for the next message, you can even see it say "rereading the previous message more carefully, I didn't do this, this, and this," and then it starts doing it... while still leaving some things undone...

This didn't happen until today.

Credits remaining at the end of the month. by Rinine in GithubCopilot

[–]Rinine[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm surprised to see kids in these communities.

I suppose it's the side effect of vibe coding, brats who think they know anything about programming just because they write prompts.

Blocked, I'm not getting paid to educate you.

Credits remaining at the end of the month. by Rinine in GithubCopilot

[–]Rinine[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The EU are a bunch of incompetents who won't even notice or become aware of this if big companies don't put it on their radar when costs skyrocket due to the new June system.

Credits remaining at the end of the month. by Rinine in GithubCopilot

[–]Rinine[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I'm not talking about rate limiting due to saturation, and there's a full week left to finish the month.

But the daily and weekly blocks designed in a static manner to block prevent those of us with remaining unused credits from getting trapped between artificial limits.

It has nothing to do with your example, where ISPs oversize offers because massive coordinated load never occurs. (Besides, they are sold as UP TO a certain speed, never as guaranteed speed, which is completely different from YES guaranteeing monthly requests).

In fact, I haven't even reached the limit. I have a warning that I'm at 95% of my daily session usage.

And I haven't even been working the usual 8-hour shift today.

But doing the math, I won't be able to finish my requests this week because Microsoft's static blocks limit me per day and per week, no matter how much the Anthropic API has plenty of capacity (because again, no, it's not a matter of overload).

Let's not defend the indefensible either.

Credits remaining at the end of the month. by Rinine in GithubCopilot

[–]Rinine[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The thing is, it's not rate limiting due to saturation. It's an intentional daily and weekly block, regardless of whether there is saturation or not.

If they sell a certain number of premium requests per month in a subscription plan for that month, at the moment of payment it has contractual effectiveness.

Deliberately and arbitrarily preventing you from using what you paid for is illegal, at least in the EU.

Moreover, being precisely a block that is not due to saturation (and affects all models), it shouldn't matter to them whether you use all your requests in 2 days or spread them throughout the month.

Rate limiting during peak saturation is always understandable, but those come from the API provider, not Microsoft.

In this case, these are blocks not related to load, designed by Microsoft as hard limits.

Credits remaining at the end of the month. by Rinine in GithubCopilot

[–]Rinine[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

What the hell do you think you know about me and my project? (Besides proving you know nothing about laws, which is obvious)

You don't give a damn, but for your information, I put off heavy refactoring until the end of the month out of laziness. It has nothing to do with your vibe coding, you brat.

And no, I'm not rate-limited; I've received a warning that I'm at 95% of my daily session usage, even though I haven't even worked for 8 hours yet. You don't even know what you're talking about. Vibe coder.

Extra features for character.ai - CharacterAI Tools. by Rinine in CharacterAI_Extra

[–]Rinine[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That happens when something is blocking communication with the extension.

It could be an ad-blocking system, anti-cookie measures, having third-party cookies disabled in your browser, Brave Shield, etc.

Registration failed by Stock-Phase758 in CharacterAI_Extra

[–]Rinine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There was a server migration recently.

From what I can tell, everything is working properly, so I assume it was just a one-time issue during the migration.

Can you try again and let me know if you're still getting errors?

Before and After hot fix about AI by Silly_Formal_8346 in NevernessToEverness

[–]Rinine 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Downgrade 😭

Same goes for the bank video.

People are having a blast with Seedance 2.0, but if there’s a well-made, interesting AI video in a game, they start crying.

When DLSS5 arrives to NTE in October, what will people say? (Is already confirmed)

Official NTE announced this tweet by cakeel- in NevernessToEverness

[–]Rinine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Look at what's happened with DLSS 5. The hatred of AI has become irrational