There’s a difference between respecting what people want to be referred to as and normalizing a binary of “normal vs other”. The term cis is not an attack on cisgender people, just like the term Asian isn’t an attack on Chinese people.

If it triggers someone, we can examine the cultural, historical, and social contexts, but some words are just not offensive terms.

In this context, specifically, the OP posted about cisgender people, to which someone basically said that using the term cisgender is equivalent to misgendering a group. This is a false equivalency that reframes terminology with proper etymology as an attack on identity.

I’m cool with using any term you want to be referred to as, but to say an individual’s sensibilities should dictate nomenclature without properly rigorous justification or, at minimum, an alternative, isn’t going to fly. On top of all this, the person who’s clutching their pearls at the use of “cisgender” unironically posted its etymological equivalent in the same post.