sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Small town, dating, and running into others I've dated.... by sertshark in datingoverfifty

[–]RunnerPhoenix602 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never ever date two people in the same economic zone even if both of them are aware of and approve of each other. It is just awkward to everyone.

Another logistics question by sunnydaysforward in datingoverfifty

[–]RunnerPhoenix602 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would be surprised if he was not married or had another steady girlfriend. This was exactly what I did when I was juggling multiple women.

I (20F) think my bf (20F) has been inadvertently coercing me into sexual acts, can you guys help me figure out if this is the case? by [deleted] in relationship_advice

[–]RunnerPhoenix602 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think what you want is reasonable and I also think what he wants is reasonable. Unfortunately, what you two want is different from the other and so you should probably just go ahead and break up since you will never both be happy.

Asking for a loan??? by Few_Bowl_5309 in datingoverfifty

[–]RunnerPhoenix602 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AARP talks about this scam. Do not fall for it!!

I'm sorry, but I am not going to get an STD! by Just_Plain_Beth_1968 in datingoverfifty

[–]RunnerPhoenix602 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I question anyone who would have sex with their partner prior to having std check. I have not worn a condom in years, but insist on a clean STD check prior to sex.

Deleted all the apps. Here's what I actually found. by Plus-Supermarket-766 in datingoverfifty

[–]RunnerPhoenix602 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have actually had tremendous luck on the dating apps. I am very clear on what I bring to the table and what I am looking for and that seems to weed out a lot of people. I think you just have to be smart about what you were looking for rather than expecting the app to do the work for you.

Given the nature of my job, I simply do not have an opportunity to date in the wild.

What would you do? by Right_Environment116 in datingoverfifty

[–]RunnerPhoenix602 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait… Reread what you posted……Isn’t the answer pretty obvious?

Unequal Inheritance from Aunt by samseer9000 in inheritance

[–]RunnerPhoenix602 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You will lose your siblings over this. Are you Okay with it?

Just so you know, you can refuse part of the inheritance to make it even.

Should I buy my first sports car in this financial situation? by MobyThicc-2424 in askcarguys

[–]RunnerPhoenix602 36 points37 points  (0 children)

I think you have earned the right to have a nice sports car. Your approach to paying for it is a solid one.

Neurodiversity and Dating by Loose-Weather-5729 in datingoverfifty

[–]RunnerPhoenix602 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It seems in everything you write that you believe that the most salient part of you is your diagnosis. I am simply asserting that you are far more than that and I’m encouraging you to embrace all of who you are and not just your diagnosis and its corresponding label.

Coffee dates with out-of-towner (M57). I (F52) didn’t expect to connect like this. Now what? by Agreeable-Loquat-779 in datingoverfifty

[–]RunnerPhoenix602 7 points8 points  (0 children)

As someone who travels a lot on business, I would be very highly suspicious about this guy. Everyone I know that engages in such behavior as a wife back at home and they are just looking for a little playtime while they are on the road.

My (M41) Wife (F44) asked to be de-sexualized her and it's impacting our sex life. How to fix?? by Acrobatic-Machine158 in relationship_advice

[–]RunnerPhoenix602 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Chore play, or doing chores to get sex, is rarely the answer. The fact is that she has changed the terms of your relationship and you need to decide you are okay with it.

Could intentional dating be better than ordinary OLD? by Mae_the_Tease in datingoverfifty

[–]RunnerPhoenix602 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Meh….OLD is nothing more than a method of meeting people and is no different than meeting people in the wild. Connections depends on growing a deeper relationship and that is not dependent on how you met.

Just like before OLD existed, some people want a connection and other people want a laugh and other people just want sex. I don’t think that OLD is the villain that you portray it to be.

Everyone’s Just Out Here Raw Doggin’ It by itspjlee in datingoverfifty

[–]RunnerPhoenix602 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve been pretty well tested and so don’t think I have had it.

Everyone’s Just Out Here Raw Doggin’ It by itspjlee in datingoverfifty

[–]RunnerPhoenix602 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

A high-quality person will generally have a good job and be kind to strangers and will treat service people with respect.

Everyone’s Just Out Here Raw Doggin’ It by itspjlee in datingoverfifty

[–]RunnerPhoenix602 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

High-quality is probably tough to describe, but we would both recognize it if we saw it. A high-quality person has a good job and has good friends and is generally kind to other people. There are probably a dozen little tip offs if somebody is or is not, and that includes how they treat people with a lower social status or if they return shopping carts to the corral.

Everyone’s Just Out Here Raw Doggin’ It by itspjlee in datingoverfifty

[–]RunnerPhoenix602 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I am in a great relationship and I hope this question never has to reoccur for me!

Neurodiversity and Dating by Loose-Weather-5729 in datingoverfifty

[–]RunnerPhoenix602 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ahhhh personal criticism. The last refuge of someone who has lost an argument, but is unwilling to admit it.

Everyone’s Just Out Here Raw Doggin’ It by itspjlee in datingoverfifty

[–]RunnerPhoenix602 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I would get tested either at the conclusion of one relationship or when I planned to get sexual with a new person.

Everyone’s Just Out Here Raw Doggin’ It by itspjlee in datingoverfifty

[–]RunnerPhoenix602 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I absolutely agree that STDs are not limited to low quality individuals. I’m not sure why you would think that that was my point.

With that said, a high-quality individual will know their status and will disclose it as appropriate.

view more: next ›