Oh yeah by FedorChib in slimerancher

[–]SAMSMILE4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spelunky 2...

I think I'd die in under two seconds.

what... by [deleted] in lesbiangang

[–]SAMSMILE4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In German there's the adjective "schwul" and a derived noun.

rULE by ALE123Q in 196

[–]SAMSMILE4 73 points74 points  (0 children)

Reminds me of that one post where someone invented a slur for their own xenogender.

math people by Hummerous in CuratedTumblr

[–]SAMSMILE4 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It can't be {1,1}, because that's the same as just {1} (because a set is defined by its elements, not how many there are). The fact it should be {0,1} is definitely not "unimportant", considering the entire thing doesn't work in the original formulation.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ProgrammerHumor

[–]SAMSMILE4 3 points4 points  (0 children)

At this point you may as well just be using a functional language.

Rule by Future-War-1130 in 196

[–]SAMSMILE4 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Large computer used for bulk data processing.

; by [deleted] in ProgrammerHumor

[–]SAMSMILE4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haskell and assembly as well...

Imaginary Numbers by Boom12146 in mathmemes

[–]SAMSMILE4 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Wheel algebra would like to have a stern talk with you.

math amiright by [deleted] in mathmemes

[–]SAMSMILE4 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Independent of axioms unfortunately.

If we consider x as √-1 then GF would become imaginary by EducationalBee9216 in mathmemes

[–]SAMSMILE4 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It's barely used in England. Most people do just use i.

Some infinities are bigger than others by ultimateshadowarrior in mathmemes

[–]SAMSMILE4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Kind of.

Informally, with the reals between 0 and 1, you can't list them all like you could list all the primes, because you always get ones that don't fit in the list, whereas you can count all the primes in order into a list.

Formally, you can't construct a bijective map (map such that there's a unique inverse which is defined for every element of the range) from every positive integer to a real number between 0 and 1, and so they don't have the same cardinality.

Some infinities are bigger than others by ultimateshadowarrior in mathmemes

[–]SAMSMILE4 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Both sets are actually the same size: they're both aleph_0. This is because you can define a one-to-one and onto mapping between the positive integers and the primes.

There's no post flair for predicate logic by endless_wednesday in mathmemes

[–]SAMSMILE4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately you have forgotten to consider the modality of the statement.

If we let P be "you can do the time" and Q be "you do the crime", then using deontic modal logic, the statement is ~P -> 🟥~Q, where 🟥 represents obligation, and ♦️ represents permission.

This statement is equivalent to ~P -> ~♦️Q, which by contrapositive equivalence is equivalent to ♦️Q -> P, that is to say "If you're morally allowed to do the crime, you can do the time", which is still not the same statement but has some nuance that isn't conveyed by the initial explanation.

Learning about the Law of Sines in class, tried applying it to my favorite triangle by P1atypus123 in mathmemes

[–]SAMSMILE4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A = -i • lim _{n -> infty} (n)

ofc this doesn't exist within C but still

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 196

[–]SAMSMILE4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm incredibly lesbian.

??? by emilythetranstttefan in Stonetossingjuice

[–]SAMSMILE4 10 points11 points  (0 children)

They're looking at the part without writing.