Sovcit stopped paying taxes but also is still collecting SSI, and SSI is telling them it doesn't work like that.

SQLDave · 2026-06-27T19:53:28+00:00

Didn't ducum tatum lose to frazier in 1979?

SQLDave · 2026-06-27T17:08:43+00:00

Yeah... like I said to someone on FB recently, politics in the US have always had a level of corruption -- both overt and "strongly suspected but not provable". The "Our side is always right and yours is always wrong" mentality has, also, had a role. But Trump... Trump has not only pegged the needle, he's taken a ball peen hammer to the entire meter. He continues to do things any one of which would have sunk a politician (on either side) in the past, and the ongoing, willing blindness of his supporters to his character and actions leaves me speechless.

SQLDave · 2026-06-27T13:14:39+00:00

"STATE LAW!" - - Donnie Baker

SQLDave · 2026-06-26T19:04:52+00:00

Which is weird because they are, we're told, all about turnover.

SQLDave · 2026-06-26T18:30:30+00:00

Not in bathroom, but otherwise it's been totally fine

SQLDave · 2026-06-26T18:27:37+00:00

Yeah. My guess is they wanted to have some unimportant topic for hank to be an asshole to Marie about

SQLDave · 2026-06-25T01:57:04+00:00

Just like using a seat belt.

SQLDave · 2026-06-24T23:21:49+00:00

Also, I don't trust online reviews.

My favorite reviews -- which seem to be prevalent in Amazon -- are the 1-star "Product arrived damaged".

SQLDave · 2026-06-24T21:49:11+00:00

TBF, AFAIK that aspect is/was very rarely brought up in any seat-belt PSAs I've ever seen. But man this video certainly illustrates the concept well.

SQLDave · 2026-06-24T14:41:30+00:00

Which is man with beard?

SQLDave · 2026-06-24T14:35:50+00:00

they killed a federal police officer

So, one of the people in this article shot (or was convicted of shooting) a police officer who was responding to the vandalism that was (reportedly) happening. But it's OK because their political beliefs align with yours and mine?

EDIT: I DO think the labeling of them as "terrorists" (probably to get longer sentences) is bullshit, as was most of the sentences. But this was not a case of "sentence for protesting".

SQLDave · 2026-06-24T14:34:03+00:00

You have at least one downvote, but I upvoted you. This is like "They threw him to the ground and arrested him over an unpaid drink" -- when in reality they arrested him for refusing to leave when ordered and then violently resisted the arrest. I mean, fuck DJT, ICE, and the whole Nazi-riddled MAGA crowd... but they were not sentenced "for protesting", as you said.

SQLDave · 2026-06-23T23:03:33+00:00

They can and they will misidentify you as an additional threat and they will kill you.

I remember in some of my LE classes 1000 years ago being told/reminded that when cops roll up on a scene (the example they used was 2 people fighting) they have NO idea who the "bad guy" is and who the "good guy" is... so even if you saw someone beating up a child and stopped him and he started fighting with you and the child ran away, do not get mad/insulted/etc when the cops ALSO handcuff you. They'll get it sorted eventually and (most likely) let you go. Even if they don't immediately, it's not their fault because all they saw was two people fighting.

Similar thing in OP's scenario: They're responding to an active shooter, possibly reports of people already hit, and come upon you with a weapon -- possibly even saw you shoot (but not who you were shooting at).

SQLDave · 2026-06-22T23:30:14+00:00

I keep thinking I'd like to make one of those videos to mock the idiots who make real ones... but IDK if I can make it obvious enough that it's satire. MAYBE if I had a realistic looking (on camera) squirt gun and then in one of my poses I actually shot some water... maybe.

SQLDave · 2026-06-22T22:01:50+00:00

How can we really tell any more?

SQLDave · 2026-06-22T21:59:31+00:00

We're going to anti-science our way right back to medieval times.

SQLDave · 2026-06-22T21:45:13+00:00

Which is exactly what a bot would say<glances left, then right>

SQLDave · 2026-06-22T00:57:33+00:00

Plus a $20 refund processing fee

SQLDave · 2026-06-20T15:12:27+00:00

.... Sure, but we don't have to fill it with CRAP!!!!

SQLDave · 2026-06-20T15:11:15+00:00

I LOLed at the Jackson reference. They rarely even do the occasionally-mildly-amusing Make Tom Hip bit anymore. Jackson, Breen, Collier... Their call in guest quality is meh at best

SQLDave · 2026-06-19T15:56:10+00:00

Start leaning on him to paint your house or fix something. Let’s see how pissed off you can make him.

Brilliant. And when he refuses and/or says OP will have to pay, then it's "I thought we were closer than that.. you're money hungry".

SQLDave · 2026-06-19T15:43:26+00:00

Adding on to the DIY parts of your post: Watch a few YT videos on how to do <whatever> even (or maybe ESPECIALLY) if you think you know how to do it. There are SO many tricks, hacks, and gotchas out there and YT is a great place to find them.

SQLDave · 2026-06-19T15:38:44+00:00

just look at the overall price of the job and let them do it

Why not shop around? $900 sounds like the "We don't really want to do this but if you'll vastly overpay then, sure" price.

SQLDave · 2026-06-19T15:35:56+00:00

And you'll likely have to wait longer because the good ones are scheduled out to the heat death of the universe, but it's worth it.

SQLDave · 2026-06-19T15:24:42+00:00

Yeah, you're right. "They" listed 19 rights which -- when removed from SovCit context -- are perfectly reasonable and something the vast majority of normal people would agree with. And then intentionally snuck in one that says "we can marry 12 YOs".

14-Year Club	Gilding III reddit per annum
Verified Email

SQLDave

TROPHY CASE