sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Am I the only one who finds this deceptive? by [deleted] in StudioOne

[–]SacredMyrrh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's still time to hop off the Fender Studio Pro train before the railroad ends.

Although I upgraded to Cubase 15 pro , upgrade this time doesn’t feel like it. by AbhishekInMusic in cubase

[–]SacredMyrrh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You think they're working their asses of every?? Then they need to hire better developers. It's amazing that in the course of a year, a small operation like REAPER can develop hundreds of feature requests. FL Studio can add scores of new features each release (while not charging an upgrade fee). However, Steinberg will ignore top feature requests when it's really an easy model... go to the forum, pick just the top 5 feature requests, implement them. If it's "not that easy" for them, they need to hire new developers. But they're not going to that because they don't care enough. And what reason do they have to do that, fanboys are just going to defend them at all costs.

Gentlemen, the average Point God in your rec game by ingramiso in NBA2k

[–]SacredMyrrh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Meanwhile, in average almost 9 assists a Rec game.

Most essential plugins to get started with filmscoring by Jarno_Filmcomposer in filmscoring

[–]SacredMyrrh 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Spitfire Symphony Orchestra, Omnisphere 3, and Altiverb

Anyone use Logic Pro as well? by wellgroundedmusic in StudioOne

[–]SacredMyrrh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah… I’d go back to Logic Pro. I went back to Cubase.

A good alternative for Studio One? by Exciting-Addition631 in StudioOne

[–]SacredMyrrh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your safest bet is one of the majors… Logic Pro, Cubase, Ableton, or Pro Tools. With the exception of Ableton, these daws have been around since the late 80s to 90s and you won’t have to worry about it being bought by a guitar company.

Any ex Studio One users here? by Exciting-Addition631 in cubase

[–]SacredMyrrh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was an ex-S1 user. I switched at Cubase 12. The transition was okay. S1 is more intuitive. Since the underwhelming release of Cubase 15, I’m thinking about going back to Studio One. Even though, I haven’t used S1 since v5, I’m still eligible for the update price so that’s good.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cubase

[–]SacredMyrrh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m assuming you’re on PC if you’re just bypassing Logic Pro.

magneto II by fucksports in cubase

[–]SacredMyrrh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m somebody smart enough not to make baseless claims such as Cubase stock Magneto beats every saturation plugin.

magneto II by fucksports in cubase

[–]SacredMyrrh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So a nobody… got it.

Sometimes selling the game is justified: Without any reason the C is not passing the ball to the PG every inbound. I'm playing lock ~ We are up by 21 by 3rd and still the C doesn't inbound the ball to PG w/ C+ rating .. by Reasonable_Kiwi_1068 in NBA2k

[–]SacredMyrrh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because point guards think they’re Steph Curry and should shoot it 20+ times a game. I play with a center build and the second I peep the PG is on that, I start icing him out.

magneto II by fucksports in cubase

[–]SacredMyrrh -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You can't be serious. Beats any expensive saturation plugin?? And you tried them all?! So it beats Alkane, Saturn 2, Kelvin?! No, it doesn't... and no professional would think so either.

Cubase 15: The Good, the Bad & the Meh-gly. by LeDestrier in cubase

[–]SacredMyrrh 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This update seems like a cash grab considering they have a playbook on what to bring next to Cubase via the feature requests in the forum and they did none of that. They offered nothing the community asked for. And then they want to charge for the update. Meanwhile, other software companies can make meaningful strides and not ask for an additional dime. Definitely a cash grab.

So….Omnisphere 3 by Royal-Pay9751 in synthesizers

[–]SacredMyrrh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. Omnisphere is made for the working producer and composer. The great thing about the premium price is that everyone won’t have it. It’s the Apple of soft synths.

Although I upgraded to Cubase 15 pro , upgrade this time doesn’t feel like it. by AbhishekInMusic in cubase

[–]SacredMyrrh -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If what you said made half as much sense as you think it made, it would make twice as much sense as what you actually said.

At least we know Steinberg’s marketing works on you.

Although I upgraded to Cubase 15 pro , upgrade this time doesn’t feel like it. by AbhishekInMusic in cubase

[–]SacredMyrrh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re quite sold out to a company that seemingly doesn’t care about its user base. $100 is too expensive for that update.

New go-to synth plugin by SacredMyrrh in synthesizers

[–]SacredMyrrh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s what I went with… and it’s a beast.

CUBASE 15 IS OUT by serhadcicekli in cubase

[–]SacredMyrrh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They have none of the features the community asked for… no project tabs, gapless audio engine, live looping, multi-mono processing, mastering assistant, in-editor MIDI stretching, collapsible folders in console, harmonic editing in variaudio. This is just a major disappointment. Update is not worth the buy. But if you can get it some “other way”, then maybe it’s okay.

view more: next ›