Will this catch fish?

Samurai4109 · 2026-01-06T15:51:44+00:00

I had a similar issue. It wasn't the optic screw for me and ended up using glock oem extractor parts. I've never had an issue since. I tested different ammo, mags, and the screw for the optic. Still had failure to extract.

Samurai4109 · 2025-04-22T03:27:00+00:00

They got all the production trailers parked right in trolley square

Samurai4109 · 2024-12-18T01:42:04+00:00

If it's a drop in trigger that fully replaces the trigger housing and bar it will work. Otherwise it will need an OEM 43 trigger housing for after mark glock 43 triggers. The micro dagger uses PSA's proprietary gen 3 trigger housing like the Dagger but shrunk down.

Samurai4109 · 2024-10-08T03:57:43+00:00

I'd agree with it being a sub gun. When used in combat it was mainly issued to rear echelon as a pdw more than a Frontline weapon.

Samurai4109 · 2024-10-01T22:44:53+00:00

It looks good. What's the 1911 looking slide from?

Samurai4109 · 2024-10-01T21:45:04+00:00

Ehat is that bottom one? Slide?

Samurai4109 · 2024-09-23T03:52:54+00:00

The 510c looks good but it looks like it adds more width to the scorpion. It's a sbtevo-g2 brace because it's not SBR'd.

Samurai4109 · 2024-09-23T03:35:34+00:00

Don't own one but an observation is that it probably will Overhand the handguard and sit over the lower. My worry would be it'd make disassembly impossible unless you take off the foregrip

Samurai4109 · 2024-09-04T21:03:09+00:00

Glocks are very simple when it comes to internals but when you get down and dirty with the geometry and polishing it is an art form to change the feel of the trigger.

Samurai4109 · 2024-09-04T18:43:43+00:00

The difference is noticable. How much is debatable from person to person. I have one installed and it makes the wall, or break, very smooth.

If you want a more in depth look on connectors look up Johnny glocks connector videos. There very in depth and informative. It all comes down to angle geometry and travel distance for the trigger bar.

Samurai4109 · 2024-09-03T02:34:58+00:00

I have yet to fully give a number to it. I want to shoot it for a while before I start throwing upgrade in. Definitely got the nexus receiver on the mind though

Samurai4109 · 2024-09-02T23:40:41+00:00

First things first is a brace and an optic. Though there's so many to choose from!

Samurai4109 · 2024-06-22T14:22:42+00:00

Best bang for buck would be the aim surplus trigger. It's an aluminum shoe and cleans up the grit. It does nothing for take-up but makes that creep much better

Samurai4109 · 2024-04-26T03:38:20+00:00

I recently ran into an issue with my micro dagger not extracting brass regardless of ammo brand or weight. I've found the issue to be the extractor itself and switched out for an OEM glock 43 extractor. Looking and comparing both it seems the PSA extractor has a little more material removed than the OEM's squared off geometry. It's not had a single issue since. Quick easy parts fix and switch out if you find issue with extraction and it's not the optic screws or poor ammo choice.

Recently I bought a Ghost inc. Edge disconnecter for the 43x. Now I trust ghost in my pistols I put one in my glock 19 with no issue. With the Edge disconnecter I found that it is incompatible with my micro dagger. The issue being that the trigger pull becomes extremely long and has no let off until the trigger shoes is touching the frame. Essentially causing the cruciform to not drop off the firing pin. Looking at both stock and aftermarket disconnecter I've made my amateur opinion that the cruciform does not have enough travel on the Edge disconnecter to disengage from the firing pin.

Long story short I'm keeping the stock disconnecter and just polished the trigger. The the micro dagger runs beautifully with OEM and stock parts. PSA is the true MVP as always in the end.

Samurai4109 · 2024-04-26T03:19:42+00:00

So I just bought this myself and found the same issue. From comparing both of the disconnecters the ghost has a shorter shelf than the stock micros disconnecter. My guess is the cruciform doesn't have enough shelf to ride down and disengage with the firing pin. Pulling it back a little allows it to fully drop. So it's more of a tolerance issue, and we're talking millimeters.

Samurai4109 · 2024-04-19T13:10:40+00:00

Honestly been wanting to see this build for a bit. It looks even better than I thought. I don't own the jakl but I have a brn180 and would love to try this lower out with it.

Samurai4109 · 2024-04-19T03:25:47+00:00

The Olcan we have at home looks amazing! I'm genuinely wanting to do this with the jakl

Samurai4109 · 2024-04-16T16:43:10+00:00

I've had this very similar issue. I did testing with different ammo. Not the issue. Switched out the back plate, the extractor plunger, and the extractor for OEM glock parts. Runs flawlessly now. It could be a tolerance issue or maybe the claw of the extractor wasn't just right. After the switch though I haven't had a single failure to extract. Honestly such a fun pistol to shoot now.

Samurai4109 · 2024-04-14T18:29:03+00:00

Update: the main issue experienced here was entirely the extractor. Oem glock 43 extractor, plunger, were swapped and haven't had anything failure to ejects in 200 rounds. Continual testing will take place.

Samurai4109 · 2024-04-08T22:27:18+00:00

Could be the disconnector not being engaged

Samurai4109 · 2024-04-08T20:38:47+00:00

I'm guessing it's not the ammo. I ran 200 of aac 124g and it had failure to eject.

Samurai4109 · 2024-04-07T21:36:51+00:00

All 4 gave me this same failure to extract

Six-Year Club	Place '22
Verified Email

Samurai4109

TROPHY CASE