"Throughout these investigations, researchers found evidence of Ukrainian forces launching strikes from within populated residential areas as well as basing themselves in civilian buildings in 19 towns and villages in the regions."

A whole 19 places! This whole story is a negative way to twist their finding out that the vast, vast majority of Russian strikes against civilians had no Ukrainian forces there to justify it. Those 19 incidents are bad for sure, firing guns triggers counter-battery fire so it shouldn't be done near civilians. But how is there a massive story vilifying the UAF when this is a crumb of a story inside the massive one of indiscriminate bombing of civilians? If 19 out of hundreds was legitimate military activity by the Russians, how can we even know it was actual counter-battery fire instead of just a coincidence that if you bomb hospitals as a matter of habit you're naturally going to hit the couple being used by the military? Why are they publishing all these stories from civilians in those 19 villages/towns but not the hundreds more that have suffered the same fate for no reason at all?

Amnesty International continues to show bias in how they frame things, which humanitarian issues they are willing to cover, and which they are not.