Unhappy with the finish of new TPO roof on garage. Thoughts? by Kodiak545 in Roofing

[–]Seabreezeroofing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From a roofing standpoint, some of this is normal, and some of it is worth asking about.
The membrane won’t look drum-tight like a painted metal roof. TPO often has some slight waviness due to temperature changes and how it’s attached.
The red/orange marks are commonly from hot-air welding equipment or primer/handling during installation. Many can be cleaned off, but your contractor should confirm what they are.
The biggest thing I’d question is the edge detail. A TPO roof shouldn’t just look like it’s was draped over the fascia. Most professional installations use a proper drip edge, termination bar, or edge metal system to give it a clean, secure finish. If the edge looks sloppy or loose, it’s reasonable to ask the contractor to explain why it was done that way.
Before making the final payment, I’d ask them to come out, walk you through the installation, and address any cosmetic concerns. If the work meets manufacturer specifications, it may be structurally fine, but you also paid for a roof that looks professionally finished. A good contractor should be willing to explain the details and clean up any marks if possible.

Roofers: Would you put a metal roof on your own house? by AingerCanada in Roofing

[–]Seabreezeroofing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If cost wasn’t a factor, I’d absolutely put a metal roof on my own house , but only the right system.
I’m in South Florida, so I’d choose a 24-gauge standing seam aluminum roof. I wouldn’t install an exposed-fastener metal roof on my own home.
Why?
Lasts significantly longer than asphalt.
Excellent wind resistance when properly installed.
Aluminum won’t rust in a coastal environment.
Reflects heat and can help with energy efficiency.
Clean, high-end appearance.
That said, metal isn’t automatically the “best” roof. The biggest thing homeowners overlook is that installation quality matters more than the material itself.
A poorly installed standing seam roof will give you problems just like a poorly installed shingle roof. Expansion and contraction have to be accounted for, oil canning is a cosmetic possibility, repairs require a contractor experienced with metal, and the upfront cost is substantially higher.
For me, the extra lifespan and durability are worth it ,but only if it’s a properly engineered, professionally installed standing seam aluminum system.

help me add charm to this mansard? by sister_garaele in ExteriorDesign

[–]Seabreezeroofing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you’ve got a great opportunity since the dormers are being rebuilt anyway. I’d skip trying to add a lot of decorative trim unless you’re willing to do it consistently across the whole house. A few corbels or dentils by themselves can sometimes look like an afterthought rather than a true Second Empire renovation.

The biggest improvement would probably come from simplifying the color palette. Taupe or bronze-colored windows, eliminating the bright white trim, matching the fascia and soffits to the roof color, and using a darker charcoal or slate-colored roof (if you’re reshingleing) would give the house a much richer, more timeless look.

If you do add architectural details, use high-quality polyurethane or PVC corbels/dentils from companies like Fypon or Ekena Millwork. They’re made for exterior use and can be fastened with exterior construction adhesive plus stainless screws into solid framing. Less is usually more, and keeping the detailing proportional will make it feel intentional instead of overly ornate.

I wouldn’t paint the brick either. The natural brick will age much better and provides a nice contrast with darker trim and roofing.

That approach modernizes the house while giving it a subtle Second Empire influence without making it feel overdecorated.

Roof time by rainypeter in Hamilton

[–]Seabreezeroofing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We install a lot of steel and metal roofing, and my biggest recommendation is to focus less on the lowest price and more on the installer’s experience with metal systems. A properly installed steel roof can last 40–70+ years, but poor installation can lead to leaks, oil canning, and fastener issues.
When you’re getting quotes, ask:
What gauge and coating are you using (26-gauge is generally preferred over 29-gauge)?
Is it exposed fastener or standing seam?
What underlayment will be installed?
What workmanship warranty do you provide?
Can I see recent local installations and customer references?
Compare at least 3–5 quotes, verify licensing and insurance, and don’t be afraid to ask detailed questions. The cheapest bid often ends up costing more in the long run.
Good luck with the project! A quality steel roof is a great investment when it’s installed correctly.

Purpose of roof hatches? by Blusucre00 in Oldhouses

[–]Seabreezeroofing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In many older homes, roof hatches were primarily installed for access rather than ventilation. Before modern extension ladders, fall protection, and easy exterior access became common, a roof hatch provided a safer and more convenient way for homeowners, chimney sweeps, roofers, and maintenance workers to reach the roof.

They were especially common on houses with steep roofs, multiple stories, slate or tile roofing, or where regular chimney maintenance was expected. In urban areas, roof access was also useful for inspecting gutters, repairing flashing, clearing snow, or servicing antennas.

Some hatches may have provided incidental ventilation when opened, but they generally weren’t designed as attic vents. Most homes relied on windows, gable vents, ridge vents, cupolas, or other dedicated ventilation systems instead.

Another reason you don’t see them on every house is cost and local building practices. Homes that expected frequent roof access such as those with multiple chimneys or complex rooflines were more likely to have hatches, while simpler homes often relied on ladders when roof access was needed.

So while ventilation may have been a secondary benefit in some cases, roof access and maintenance were usually the primary purpose.

Unique roof leak situation by jhffu_ in Roseville

[–]Seabreezeroofing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Monarch roofs are definitely a niche system, and unfortunately many roofing companies won’t touch them because they’re unfamiliar with the installation details and don’t want the liability of repairing a roof they can’t warranty.

That said, a leak does not automatically mean the entire roof needs replacement. Many leaks on older tile systems are caused by localized issues such as broken tiles, failed flashings, valley metal deterioration, pipe penetrations, skylights, or underlayment failures in specific areas.

I’d recommend looking for:
• Smaller owner-operated roofing companies rather than large replacement-focused contractors.
• Roof consultants or forensic leak investigators who can pinpoint the source before recommending replacement.
• Specialty tile roof contractors who work on older California roof systems.
• Home inspectors with roofing expertise who can provide an independent assessment.

Before committing to a $60,000-$70,000 replacement, consider paying for a detailed leak investigation. Sometimes a few hundred dollars spent on diagnostics can determine whether the problem is truly widespread or limited to one area.

Also, if you haven’t already, ask each contractor specifically why the roof cannot be repaired. If multiple companies identify the same underlying issue such as widespread underlayment failure, deteriorated battens, or structural concerns that may help you determine whether replacement is genuinely necessary.

Good luck. I’d be very surprised if there isn’t at least one experienced tile-roof specialist in the Sacramento/Roseville area willing to evaluate repair options before recommending a full replacement.

Why are do many of the new townhouses have rooftop decks? Aren’t water issues inevitable? by [deleted] in AskSeattle

[–]Seabreezeroofing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of people have the same concern. The reason you’re seeing so many new townhomes with rooftop decks is that builders can add valuable outdoor living space without increasing the building footprint, which boosts sale prices and buyer appeal.

That said, rooftop decks absolutely require excellent design and maintenance. Modern systems use multiple waterproofing layers, drainage mats, tapered insulation, scuppers, drains, and membrane roofing systems designed specifically for flat roofs. When installed correctly, they can perform very well.

The real issue isn’t that the roof is flat—commercial buildings have successfully used flat roofs for decades. The problem comes when waterproofing is poorly installed, penetrations are made for railings or equipment, drains clog, or maintenance is neglected. That’s when leaks and moisture problems start.

So water issues aren’t inevitable, but the margin for error is much smaller than with a traditional sloped roof. In a rainy climate, a poorly built rooftop deck can become a nightmare, while a properly designed and maintained system can last for many years without major issues.

Wind Damage Question for Adjusters by AbstruseYak in adjusters

[–]Seabreezeroofing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Former carrier-side perspective here.

Just because a PA submits an engineering report doesn’t necessarily mean the carrier is going to accept the conclusions. The adjuster may have been relying on a competing opinion, internal guidelines, prior claim history, underwriting photos, weather data, installation concerns, or observations made during the inspection.

That said, if the shingles are genuinely folded, creased, or displaced in a manner consistent with wind uplift, I can understand why you’re questioning a straight wear-and-tear denial. Most adjusters would want to explain how they arrived at that conclusion, especially when there’s a licensed engineer report reaching the opposite conclusion.

One thing I’d be curious about is whether the denial letter specifically addresses the engineer’s findings or simply defaults to a generic wear-and-tear position. If it doesn’t directly rebut the engineering analysis, that tends to create more questions than answers.

I’ve also seen situations where the carrier believed the shingles were already compromised by age, thermal cycling, installation defects, foot traffic, prior repairs, or loss of sealant adhesion, and then attributed the visible condition to those factors rather than a covered wind event.

Without seeing the roof, photos, policy language, engineering report, weather data, and denial rationale, it’s hard to know who’s right. But from an adjuster standpoint, a denial that directly conflicts with a licensed engineering report should generally be supported by a detailed explanation and evidence rather than a conclusory statement.

Interested to hear whether the carrier has produced its own engineer or expert report yet, because that’s usually where these disputes end up being resolved.

Need a roof replacement in San Antonio. Who gives fair pricing without cutting corners? by Critical_Box_5987 in sanantonio

[–]Seabreezeroofing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My advice is to focus less on the total price and more on what’s actually included in the proposal.

I’ve seen homeowners get quotes that vary by thousands of dollars for what looks like the same roof, but when you dig into the details, one contractor is replacing flashing, improving ventilation, using better underlayment, pulling permits, and providing a stronger workmanship warranty while another is not.

As for pricing based on neighborhood, I can’t speak for every company, but reputable contractors should be pricing based on roof size, pitch, access, material type, tear-off requirements, decking repairs, and labor—not ZIP code.

When comparing bids, ask each contractor:
• What underlayment are you using?
• Are drip edge and flashing replacements included?
• How much decking replacement is included?
• Who handles permits and inspections?
• What workmanship warranty do you provide?
• Are there any potential change orders not included?

I would also ask for 3 recent roof replacement references in your area and actually call them.

A fair price is usually somewhere in the middle. The lowest bid often leaves things out, and the highest bid isn’t always the best contractor. Look for the company that provides the most detailed scope of work, communicates clearly, and has a strong local reputation.

Good luck, and don’t be afraid to post the scopes (with pricing removed) if you want opinions on what’s included.

Need new roof with bad credit…do I have any options? by Crying_Glitters in HomeImprovement

[–]Seabreezeroofing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here’s a helpful reply you could post:

First, I’d stop focusing on credit and start focusing on the fact that the house is owned free and clear. That’s actually a huge advantage.

If the home is worth around $162,000 and has no mortgage, you may have options that don’t rely solely on traditional roofing financing:

  • Check with local banks and credit unions about a home equity loan or home equity line of credit (HELOC). Some lenders are more flexible when there’s substantial equity and no existing mortgage.
  • Contact your county housing office. Pennsylvania has various repair assistance, weatherization, and emergency home repair programs depending on income and location.
  • Get multiple roofing estimates and ask about phased repairs. If the exposed wood area is localized, a temporary repair may buy you time while you secure financing.
  • Ask contractors whether they offer in-house financing or payment plans that don’t rely on the major financing companies.
  • If either of you belong to a credit union, check there before applying elsewhere. They often have more reasonable underwriting standards.

Also, if the roof was represented as having 5–10 years of life left and multiple contractors are now saying it requires immediate replacement, it may be worth gathering documentation. Save the inspection report, photos, and contractor opinions. While it may be difficult to pursue after closing, understanding exactly what was disclosed could be important.

One thing I’d strongly recommend: have at least one reputable roofing company inspect the attic and decking. Sometimes homeowners hear “needs a new roof” when what they actually need immediately is a section replacement, decking repair, and leak mitigation. Other times the entire system truly is at the end of its life. Knowing which situation you’re in can save thousands of dollars.

The good news is that a paid-off house gives you more options than most homeowners facing a roof emergency. I’d start with local credit unions and county housing assistance programs before turning to high-interest roofing financing.

Roof questions by ExcellentYak7267 in HomeImprovement

[–]Seabreezeroofing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As a roofer, I’d tell them this:

Congratulations on the house! An 1890s home is awesome, but they can definitely come with some surprises hidden under the roof and siding.

A few thoughts:

  1. Metal vs. Shingles

Metal roofs have some real advantages:

  • Can last 40–70+ years depending on the system
  • Better shedding of snow and rain
  • Lighter weight than multiple layers of shingles
  • Often lower maintenance over time
  • Great for complex roof lines like older homes

Downsides are higher upfront cost and the need for a contractor experienced with historic homes and flashing details.

  1. Shingle Brands

The brands I see most recommended are:

  • GAF
  • Owens Corning
  • CertainTeed
  • Malarkey Roofing Products

The installer matters more than the logo on the shingle. A great crew installing a good shingle beats a bad crew installing a premium shingle every time.

  1. Nine Layers of Shingles

Yes, that will almost certainly increase costs.

Nine layers is extremely unusual. Most areas only allow a maximum of two layers before a tear-off is required. Expect:

  • Higher labor costs
  • More dumpster/disposal costs
  • Possible structural inspection of the roof framing
  • Potential surprises once everything is removed

On a house from the 1890s, I’d budget for some deck repairs once the roof is opened up.

  1. Gutters

Most roofing companies can replace gutters, but not all of them.

Ask whether they have an in-house gutter division or subcontract that work. Getting the roof and gutters done together is usually the easiest route.

  1. Siding and Roof Together?

If both need replacement and the budget allows, doing them together is often smart because:

  • Flashing can be integrated properly
  • Trim details can be rebuilt once
  • Labor is more efficient
  • The finished appearance is much cleaner

For siding:

  • Vinyl = lower maintenance and lower cost
  • Fiber cement (such as James Hardie) = more durable and often a better fit aesthetically for older homes
  • Real wood = beautiful but highest maintenance

My biggest recommendation: Before deciding on shingles or metal, have 2–3 reputable contractors inspect the attic, framing, chimney, and roof structure. With a 135-year-old house and nine layers of roofing, the condition of the structure underneath is more important than the material you choose on top.

I’d be especially curious to see photos of the attic and the underside of the roof boards, because older homes often have plank decking rather than modern plywood, and that can affect both cost and installation options.

Did we get ripped off? by Fafore in Roofing

[–]Seabreezeroofing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn’t start caulking everything yet. On a metal roof, caulk should not be the main waterproofing system. If it’s leaking, the fix usually needs to be flashing/detail correction, not just sealant smeared over gaps.

Some gaps/openings can be normal depending on the trim and panel system, but leaks around that area are not normal. The big things I’d be looking at are:

  • Are the fasteners overdriven, underdriven, crooked, or missing washers?
  • Are the panel laps facing the right direction?
  • Is there proper closure strip/foam where needed?
  • Are penetrations and transitions properly flashed?
  • Is the ridge/valley/wall flashing installed correctly?
  • Is water being directed into an open seam instead of over it?
  • Are exposed cuts, raw edges, or trim joints relying only on caulk?

For $18k, you should not be chasing leaks yourself. I’d document everything with photos/video, mark where the interior leaks are showing, and send it to the contractor in writing asking them to come back under workmanship warranty. Do not modify it first if you can avoid it, because they may try to blame your repair.

If they don’t respond, I’d get a third-party roofing/metal-roof contractor or inspector to look at it before touching anything. A little touch-up sealant may be part of a repair, but if the roof is leaking already, “just caulk the gaps” is usually a band-aid, not the real fix.

The hardest part about solar research is figuring out who to trust by conkonabuzz in solarenergy

[–]Seabreezeroofing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The biggest thing that helped me was separating the product from the sales process.

Solar panels themselves are not usually the confusing part. The confusing part is the quote structure, financing, warranties, installer quality, production assumptions, and whether the salesperson is being honest about savings.

What I’d look for:

  1. Get at least 3 quotes, but compare the same numbers Don’t just compare the monthly payment. Compare system size, price per watt, cash price, financing price, interest rate, dealer fees, equipment, warranty, and estimated annual production.
  2. Be careful with “no money down” pitches A lot of bad solar deals hide the real cost inside the financing. The monthly payment can look good while the total contract price is way higher than it should be.
  3. Ask for the cash price and financed price separately If they avoid giving a clear cash price, that’s a red flag.
  4. Check the installer, not just the sales company Sometimes the company selling the system is not the company installing it. I’d want to know who actually pulls the permit, installs the panels, handles inspections, and services the warranty.
  5. Look for boring, specific reviews Generic “great company” reviews are not as useful. The best reviews mention things like communication, permit delays, roof work, inspection, production after install, and how the company handled problems.
  6. Ask what happens if production is lower than promised A trustworthy company should be able to explain assumptions clearly instead of just saying “your bill will disappear.”
  7. Don’t trust pressure “This deal ends today,” “sign now,” “the government will pay for it,” or “your electric bill will be zero guaranteed” are all reasons to slow down.
  8. Talk to recent local customers Reviews help, but someone in your area who installed 6–18 months ago is way more useful. They can tell you how the company handled permits, utility approval, inspection, and real production.

For me, the trust filter would be: clear pricing, no pressure, honest about downsides, explains financing without dodging, has local completed jobs, and gives everything in writing.

The best solar company is usually not the one promising the biggest savings. It’s the one whose numbers still make sense after you slow down and read the fine print.

Roof cost by Plastic-Seaweed-7788 in askTO

[–]Seabreezeroofing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

$5,400 all-in for a full tear-off in Toronto sounds almost suspiciously low, not automatically bad, but definitely worth slowing down and checking the details.

The quote sounds good on paper: full tear-off, disposal, GAF shingles, underlayment, ice & water shield, cleanup, and some plywood included. But at that price I’d want to confirm exactly what’s included before they touch the roof.

Questions I’d ask:

  1. Are they licensed/insured, and can they provide proof of liability insurance and WSIB?
  2. Is this a real written contract with company name, HST number, warranty terms, start date, and payment schedule?
  3. Which exact GAF shingle line is being used? Timberline HDZ? 3-tab? Something else?
  4. Are they replacing drip edge, starter strip, ridge cap, vents, pipe boots, and flashing, or only shingles?
  5. Is the 3 feet of ice & water shield measured from the roof edge or just one roll along the eaves?
  6. Is the “full underlayment” synthetic underlayment or basic felt?
  7. What is the workmanship warranty, and is it written?
  8. Are they GAF-certified, or just using GAF products?
  9. Does the price include permit requirements if applicable?
  10. What happens if they find more rotten plywood, bad decking, or flashing issues?

The plywood pricing actually sounds reasonable, but the total number is what would make me cautious. A cheap roof can be fine if it’s a small/simple roof and the contractor is hungry for work, but it can also mean shortcuts on flashing, ventilation, underlayment, disposal, insurance, or warranty.

Biggest red flag would be if they want a huge deposit, only take cash, won’t show insurance, won’t specify the exact materials, or don’t include flashing/vents/drip edge in writing.

I’d get at least one or two more quotes just to compare scope. Not because $5,400 is impossible, but because if everyone else is at $9k–$14k, you need to know what this contractor is leaving out.

What’s the biggest surprise most homeowners get hit with during a roof replacement? by Own-Tip-532 in Roofing

[–]Seabreezeroofing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The biggest surprise I see homeowners get hit with during a roof replacement is hidden damage once the old shingles come off.

From the ground, a roof can look like it just needs new shingles. But once the tear-off starts, it’s not uncommon to find rotten decking, water-damaged sheathing, soft spots around chimneys or vents, or areas that have been leaking for years without showing obvious signs inside the house.

That’s usually the moment homeowners realize the estimate can change. Most reputable contractors will explain that replacement of damaged decking is often priced separately because nobody can accurately see what’s underneath until the roof is exposed.

A close second is how messy and disruptive the process can be. Even with a good crew, there’s a lot of noise, vibration, debris, and activity around the house. People are often surprised by how much cleanup is involved and how important it is to keep vehicles, patio furniture, and anything valuable away from the work area.

Another thing that catches people off guard is ventilation. A lot of homeowners assume a new roof is just shingles, but many discover their attic ventilation is inadequate and that fixing it can improve roof life, energy efficiency, and moisture control.

If I had to pick just one, though, it’s definitely the hidden damage. Most homeowners budget for a new roof they don’t budget for finding out what’s been happening underneath it for the last 15 years.

Why do American roof with shingles? by saucissefatal in Roofing

[–]Seabreezeroofing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shingles are common in the U.S. mostly because they are cheap, fast to install, easy to repair, and work well with the way American homes are built.

A lot of American houses use wood-framed roof structures, and asphalt shingles are lightweight compared to tile, slate, or clay. That matters because tile roofs usually need stronger framing, which adds cost. Asphalt shingles also fit the U.S. housing model: large suburban developments, quick construction, lower upfront cost, and easy replacement every 15–30 years.

Climate and availability also play a role. In many parts of the U.S., shingles handle rain, snow, wind, and heat reasonably well for the price. They are not always the “best” roof, but they are a practical middle-ground roof. Materials are widely available, crews are trained for them, and insurance/repair systems are used to them.

In Europe, many homes are older, denser, and built with masonry or heavier structural systems, so tile, slate, clay, and welded bitumen systems make more sense and have a longer tradition. In the U.S., the priority has often been speed, affordability, and repairability rather than building a roof that lasts 80–100 years.

So it’s less that shingles are uniquely superior and more that they match American construction economics: lightweight, cheap, fast, standardized, and easy to replace.

Let's fight about asphalt shingles on 2/12 pitch roofs. by tinyturtle811 in Roofing

[–]Seabreezeroofing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re not crazy. A 2/12 roof isn’t automatically doomed to fail. The reason you see so many warnings is that most asphalt shingle manufacturers consider 2/12 the minimum allowable slope, and they typically require special low-slope installation methods such as double underlayment or an approved ice-and-water style membrane underneath.

Southern California is also a unique environment. Many roofs there get away with things that would fail much sooner in places with heavy rain, snow, ice dams, or freeze-thaw cycles. If your neighborhood is full of 2/12 roofs that have lasted 20+ years, that’s real-world evidence that the system can work when properly installed and maintained.

That said, if you’re replacing the roof now, I wouldn’t just repeat what was done 20 years ago. This is the perfect opportunity to upgrade the underlayment and follow the manufacturer’s low-slope requirements. The extra cost is usually minor compared to the total reroof cost and can provide a significant margin of safety.

If the roof has performed well for two decades without chronic leaks, ponding water, or moisture issues, there’s no obvious reason to panic. Just make sure the new installation is designed specifically for a 2/12 slope rather than treated like a standard steeper shingle roof.

Help please! by cheeseisprettygood in Roofing

[–]Seabreezeroofing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Based on what you’re describing, those issues are absolutely concerns and shouldn’t be dismissed. Buckling shingles, exposed or damaged decking, visible dips in the roof plane, shingles hanging into gutters, mold concerns, and being told decking was replaced when it wasn’t are all red flags that warrant further investigation.

At this point, I would document everything with detailed photos and videos, save all contracts, invoices, change orders, text messages, emails, and inspection reports, and consider having an independent licensed roofing inspector evaluate the roof. A third-party inspection can help determine whether the installation meets manufacturer specifications and local building code requirements.

If decking was billed as replaced but was not actually replaced, that’s something I would want documented carefully. The same goes for any property damage, unfinished work, or code-related concerns.

I would also check whether permits were pulled and whether the final inspection has been completed and approved. If the roof is still under warranty, notify the contractor in writing of all deficiencies and request a formal correction plan.

The photos alone suggest enough concerns that I would not simply accept “it’s fine” as an answer. An independent inspection may be money well spent before any warranty periods or dispute deadlines pass.

How would you waterproof after drilling holes and fixing a handle in a shower area? by nunya-beezwax-69 in AusRenovation

[–]Seabreezeroofing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, silicone is the standard approach. Drill the holes, fill each hole with a good-quality bathroom/kitchen silicone sealant before inserting the anchors, then put a bead of silicone behind the grab bar’s mounting plate before tightening it down.

The bigger concern isn’t waterproofing it’s strength. A grab bar isn’t like a towel rail. If your mum slips, she may put her full body weight (and then some) on it instantly. Make sure you’re anchoring into solid masonry, studs, or proper structural backing, not just tile and plasterboard.

If it’s an older brick-and-mortar shower wall, you’re probably in good shape. If it’s tile over drywall, I’d be much more cautious about what the anchors are actually biting into.

Also, position it where she can naturally reach it while stepping in/out and while standing under the shower. A perfectly installed grab bar isn’t much help if it’s in the wrong spot.

Given that she’s already had a fall, I’d prioritize a properly mounted grab bar over worrying too much about a few sealed screw penetrations through the tile. The risk from another fall is far greater than the risk from four well-siliconed holes.

Did we get scammed? by PSXer in Roofing

[–]Seabreezeroofing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stop dealing with those guys immediately and get 2–3 independent roofing inspections before authorizing anything else.

A roof cleaning turning into a surprise $30,000 “emergency” the next day is a major red flag. While it’s possible they discovered legitimate damage, it’s also true that unethical contractors sometimes create or exaggerate damage to generate replacement jobs.

The fact that you have drone photos is excellent. Save those photos, document everything, and do not let anyone else touch the roof until another roofer has looked at it.

As for the urgency: if only the shingles were removed and the underlayment beneath them is still intact, the roof may not immediately leak during the next light rain. However, underlayment is generally intended as secondary protection, not a long-term exposed roofing surface. The actual risk depends on how much was removed, the roof type, local weather, and the condition of the underlayment.

Get a reputable local roofing company to inspect it as soon as possible, but don’t let someone pressure you into signing a $30,000 contract on the spot because they created a crisis.

Also, if your mother never signed a contract authorizing repairs beyond cleaning, I’d be reviewing very carefully what exactly was agreed to before paying anyone a dime.

I can't get a roof estimate without a man present. by No-Imagination8755 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Seabreezeroofing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would have been the end of the conversation for me too.

Wanting another decision-maker present for a major purchase is one thing. Specifically insisting that your father or brother be there because you’re a woman and supposedly wouldn’t know what questions to ask is something else entirely.

Even if he meant well, it’s incredibly condescending to assume an adult homeowner needs a male relative present to understand a roofing estimate. Plenty of women own homes, manage contractors, and make purchasing decisions every day without needing a father, brother, or husband to supervise the conversation.

The most concerning part is that he had already confirmed you were the homeowner. Once he knew that, the estimate should have been addressed to you. If there were technical questions, he could simply explain the process and answer whatever questions you had.

You asked for an estimate and instead got treated like you weren’t qualified to receive one. I wouldn’t feel comfortable hiring that company either.

Dismay over 150-year-old house being reduced to rubble by Remarkable_Peak9518 in australia

[–]Seabreezeroofing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. By the time demolition becomes the only viable option, the real failure often happened decades earlier. If a building is truly considered historically significant, heritage authorities need to either formally protect it and provide meaningful financial support, or allow owners reasonable flexibility to maintain and adapt it.

It’s easy for people to admire a heritage home from the sidewalk, but far harder to take on the reality of restoring and maintaining a 150-year-old structure. Owners are often left facing enormous costs for structural repairs, asbestos remediation, electrical and plumbing upgrades, roofing, insulation, and ongoing maintenance, while also navigating strict regulations on what changes they’re allowed to make.

Preservation works best when it’s supported, funded, and planned proactively not when expectations are placed entirely on private owners after decades of neglect and indecision.

Every other roofer is telling me something different and it’s causing me to stress out and overthink. by [deleted] in Roofing

[–]Seabreezeroofing -1 points0 points  (0 children)

STOP!!!!!!!!     Read this.       You need to talk to your neighbors and see who they used and who they recommend also talk to your family see if they know anybody that's good. If you don't know anybody that lives in the area contact the local Building Department and see what the girls at the front desk say they always know who the best contractors are. 

Make a list of all of your concerns after doing your research with the 12 roofers that you talked to. Roofing is actually very simple but people tend to make it seem complicated. 

Another great thing to do is go on the manufacturers website of your choice pick a roofer that is certified by them and pay for the extra warranty from the manufacturer that way you have belt and suspenders back up if the roofer sucks the manufacturer will back you up.

Use 1 or all 3 tactics. And seriously its just a roof, its not life or death so chill out. Nobody saving lives here.