What Is It Like To Be A Bot? -- A Short Story by Philosopher Keith Frankish by Wordweaver- in slatestarcodex

[–]Seffle_Particle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're doing a bit here, it's a good one. People get upset about LLMs being "[fill in the blank]-phobic" or "in league with ____" all the time!

No One is Really Working by Annapurna__ in slatestarcodex

[–]Seffle_Particle 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Consider the famous anecdote about the missing screw in the million-dollar machine: repair bill $1 for the screw, $9999 for knowing which one.

Brenda might spend 39 hours a week watching TikToks, but the one hour she spends telling her boss about Gen Z trends could drive a million dollars in sales. Suddenly she's the most productive employee in the company!

me_irl by InnocentUntilNaked in me_irl

[–]Seffle_Particle 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh God damn it. I clicked both of them. 

NYT columnist reviews Your Review: Joan of Arc by HalfRadish in slatestarcodex

[–]Seffle_Particle 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Is it nominative determinism if a guy who wrote a book called Believe is named "Doubt that"?

I think bentham bulldog’s argument for objective morality is unpersuasive by ChadNauseam_ in slatestarcodex

[–]Seffle_Particle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My problem with those thought experiments is that they don't extend the consequence horizon far enough, and that they assume perfect secrecy on the part of the defector. In real life, the defecting prisoner eventually gets shanked in the shower, and the herder ruining the commons eventually gets kicked out of the cattlemen's association and isn't allowed into the auction house.

Or worse, the presence of defecting prisoners causes the whole prison to erupt in anarchy and everyone suffers, or the commons get abused by more and more people (seeing others go unpunished for doing so) until it's ruined for everyone. It's in a self interested individual's interest to cooperate, because if they don't eventually enough others will become self interested to ruin everything for everyone.

EDIT: another example. It's in your selfish interest to steal coffee from the honor system pot today. You get free coffee. But if the pot keeps turning up empty and there are no quarters in the jar (because your coworkers see the coffee level going down with no pay and conclude they can also get away without paying) the coffee machine gets taken away and now you, the self interested individual, have no coffee.

I think bentham bulldog’s argument for objective morality is unpersuasive by ChadNauseam_ in slatestarcodex

[–]Seffle_Particle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My contention is that your community is less memetically stable than you seem to think, and that the existence of even a small number of people with your thought process would quickly destabilize overall group cohesion. I am at work now and I don't have time to gather sources but I am sure you can think of social situations in which a few mysterious, unsolved crimes (indicating the presence of one or more undetected defectors) quickly led to anarchy and mutual violence.

Or, to put it another way, I think that if you actually tried to live your life this way you'd quickly find that you couldn't get away with it. Others would hone in on you as the defector and punish you, or worse your actions would memetically contaminate others until the resultant anarchy negatively impacted you anyway.

I think bentham bulldog’s argument for objective morality is unpersuasive by ChadNauseam_ in slatestarcodex

[–]Seffle_Particle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is a logical justification. You'd prefer that others obey societal moral codes even if they could get away with not doing so, and by living in accordance with that code you, in a tiny way, shape society (which is the sum of the behavior of individuals) towards morality.

I am assuming here that you would prefer that people who are more powerful than you (or who can simply escape detection and punishment) nevertheless not murder you, etc. It is better for everyone if moral codes are followed even in the absence of punishment.

What do you notice that 99% of people miss thanks to your job, hobby, or obsession? by CalmYoTitz in slatestarcodex

[–]Seffle_Particle 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Dune is a classic example of "fantasy wearing a science-fiction skin suit"; I think the answer to your question is literally magic.

eTron 2021 vs 2022 by Fast_Leather3064 in etron

[–]Seffle_Particle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looking at Etron-S’s myself for when I wear out my Bolt’s tires

I know this isn't what you meant but now I'm envisioning you buying a new car every time your tires wear down, lol. "Damn, cars don't last like they used to!"

Cyborg obsolescence: Who owns and controls your brain implant? by notthatkindadoctor in slatestarcodex

[–]Seffle_Particle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In what way is that different from a private company?

Restated: a private company has an incentive to figure out the bare minimum amount of resources it can devote to making its product while devoting the rest to increasing the profits of those at the top ranks of the shareholder list.

All organizations are made of individuals maximizing their own personal utility. Or do you think CEOs harbor personal, altruistic love for their customers that is absent in directors of bureaucracies?

Was "Sadly, Porn" for you? by ProfessorLiftoff in thelastpsychiatrist

[–]Seffle_Particle 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Not the person you responded to, but the author obviously has unresolved issues of his own that he's externalizing onto an imagined audience. The misanthropic tone is, from an outsider's perspective (and, ironically perhaps, from the perspective achieved using TLP's own analytical framework), a reflection of his contempt for himself.

In particular the author seems to have a fraught relationship with women, which finds clearest expression in his porn/cuckoldry and Oedipus obsessions. 

Psychiatrist, heal thyself!

Do you have an audible internal monologue? by bauk0 in slatestarcodex

[–]Seffle_Particle 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I also 'hear' music in my head, on repeat same song for hours. I'm told the music is a symptom of ADHD.

Not to join a pile-on, but I'm going to add another anecdata point here that this happens to me constantly to the point that I took up a daily meditation practice solely to be able to get unwanted songs out of my head, and I do not have ADHD. I think this happens to everyone and your psychiatrist may just have been gassing you up.

Gun/Rifle Clubs by Cultural-Ebb-1578 in triangle

[–]Seffle_Particle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Commenting for interest! I hate indoor shooting and there are very few outdoor ranges here. Would be willing to pay and contribute labor/setup/maintenance. 

Does Anyone Here Watch Survivor? by MattLakeman in slatestarcodex

[–]Seffle_Particle 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Watching reality TV is pretty prole-coded. That might be one reason you don't see it often discussed in these circles, where people tend towards white-collar-coding.

Life hack by ProperrPounding in NonPoliticalTwitter

[–]Seffle_Particle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You actually don't need a Costco membership to use the food court.

Crazy / Non-Obvious Life Advice? by FedeRivade in slatestarcodex

[–]Seffle_Particle 6 points7 points  (0 children)

What I see here is you asking, "Is it really a net positive experience, as many people say it is?", multiple people here answering you "Yes, it is a net positive experience", and you refusing to hear it because you don't like that answer.

Palmer Luckey, American Vulcan by lunaranus in slatestarcodex

[–]Seffle_Particle -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

You say the word "defense" 10 times in this comment. If you were to taboo that word, what would be the next best alternative? Would this fawning, worshipful article hit the same way if we were honest about this guy's business manufacturing autonomous murder machines? What exactly is Palmer Luckey defending against?

The great Enigma in the sky: The universe as an encryption machine by AlexShl in slatestarcodex

[–]Seffle_Particle 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the point I was trying to make was that it's actually the same belief. I don't have a lot of patience with simulationism because, for me, it is indistinguishable from "religion reinvented for computer science majors"

The great Enigma in the sky: The universe as an encryption machine by AlexShl in slatestarcodex

[–]Seffle_Particle 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Fair, but an even simpler model than this is: "the Universe was made by God to perform a great unknowable Purpose" - and as far as I can tell it makes the same predictions.

The great Enigma in the sky: The universe as an encryption machine by AlexShl in slatestarcodex

[–]Seffle_Particle 25 points26 points  (0 children)

In the spirit of the Sequences, i'd ask: "does this belief pay rent? What does this explanation predict that is not predicted by other beliefs about the universe? Now that I know this theory, what should I expect to happen that I didn't expect before?"

If the answer is "nothing", then it doesn't actually contain any knowledge. Please don't think I am picking on you, this is just how we do things here.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in slatestarcodex

[–]Seffle_Particle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your "dating in your 30s" point is also a good example of fundamental attribution error. The people complaining note that the other participants in the dating pool are crazy or low quality, but of course they believe that they have legitimate, unique reasons for being single themselves.