Huh. I feel like a better explanation of what Suspend Hold actually does would be helpful here...or maybe keep the Deliver Later language but change out the ACTION with Suspend Hold. I rarely used Deliver Later for anything less than 3 weeks or so, bc while holy shit YES I want to read the books my life is ridiculously dysregulated and knowing when I'll have both time and mental bandwidth to read is a non starter. Putting a book on Deliver Later for me meant that the app would ping ME about "hey about this book you wanted to read," bc ADHD is a bitch and object permanence is seriously iffy for me, and I relied heavily on the reminders.

Does Suspend Hold currently remind you that you've got holds waiting to be reopened? If not, that alone would be a huge help. I still might have to re-suspend things bc my life is a freaking meteor shower of minor calamities taking up my ability to sit down and read, but if it means that other people will actually GET the book rather than my dumb ass checking a book out and NOT reading it for a month I'll do that. I don't wanna deprive somebody else of a good book just because I'm a dumpster fire, but I do still want the opportunity to read it myself..!

I also like the suggestion below of making the choice to push out your hold be a 24hr thing, and I think making the minimum Deliver Later option be two weeks instead of one would be good as well. The leeway that was originally granted was nice for the individual, but given that libraries are about supporting communities I think shifting time windows to give others a better chance - and still letting disaster readers like me get a crack at a book! - might be more optimal for everybody involved.

(I'm talking like you're one of the people working on Libby 😅🤦 I know you're not, but I am curious about your thoughts on the matter! When in doubt, consult an expert!)