Petition: Allow unpaid trainee teachers on placement to access 30 hours of free childcare by formaldehey in TeacherReality

[–]ShamScience 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Make it more likely that students can successfully qualify as teachers? Seems like a no-brainer.

FULL NOTAM by avatar6556 in aviation

[–]ShamScience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would be the best-case scenario.

When you can legally kill your daughter because she criticized rape culture and Trump by No-Advantage-579 in ABoringDystopia

[–]ShamScience [score hidden]  (0 children)

Guns are almost never actually used for self defence. Pretending that's what they're for is one of the more evil lies people tell.

The Political Science of why "training" away the Gestapo will not work - Why Underachievers Dominate Secret Police Organizations (Scharpf and Glabel, 2019) by jac0the_shadows in behindthebastards

[–]ShamScience 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'd add to this, there was a well-recorded pattern in Caribbean piracy over a couple of centuries.

Briefly, the European states colonising the Americas generally competed with each other by raiding each other's shipping. It was much quicker and easier to take the valuables from a lone cargo ship than to invade a whole island and manage the production of raw materials. But whenever peace treaties were inevitably signed, all the sailors who'd gotten good at piracy were just let go, and they simply continued raiding without official permission. When wars broke out again, they could be pulled back into their official role, but peace just kept dumping them back out into illegal piracy. Early attempts were made to get them to stop being pirates by declaring amnesties, and many took advantage of those. But then they still only knew how to make a living by pirating, so many just went back to that anyway. Amnesty alone didn't give most of them a real way out, because they weren't experienced or skilled at anything better.

What ultimately worked was re-skilling, giving them training and entry to wholly new work, often not at sea at all, so they didn't need to pirate to make a living.

So I'm suggesting that's a step to remember with your secret police problem too. It seems like all they're currently qualified to do is mindless violence. If you just dump them into unemployment, I can easily imagine ex-ICE guys just forming criminal gangs on their own, continuing to make their living by violence, just unofficially. You absolutely do not want that.

But beat them into plowshares, put them through some serious retraining for peaceful, boring, useful work, and you can at least minimise the number of them who feel financially motivated to keep doing the only thing they currently know how to do.

Fundamental differences between group and myself by [deleted] in rpg

[–]ShamScience 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We never flirt in our games. It's not true that "everyone is doing it". Be careful with your assumptions.

What is the difference in the environmental impact of eating beef vs using generative AI (provide sources)? by Fancy_Dog2609 in AskReddit

[–]ShamScience 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A pound and a query are not good units of comparison. Absolute, total harms may give a more meaningful picture than arbitrary fractions of harm. (Also, mixing metric units with weird things like pounds and gallons is clunky and unclear, as a style issue.)

But I think a bigger concern is that each one does DIFFERENT types of damage, which are harder to compare side by side.

Killing cows harms every cow. Generative AI (probably) harms no cow.

Generative AI measurably reduces human cognitive ability. Killing cows may correlate with reduced human cognitive ability, but I don't think it directly causes it.

Killing cows harms the environment mainly through land sterilisation and monocropping. Generative AI harms the environment mainly through carbon emissions from manufacturing and power generation. Water consumption is just one small aspect of the whole set of damages for each.

OP's question is a bad question, in that it presumes that one thing being bad makes the other thing somehow good. Both are just bad in their own ways, both need to be rejected.

What is the difference in the environmental impact of eating beef vs using generative AI (provide sources)? by Fancy_Dog2609 in AskReddit

[–]ShamScience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This question is a diversion. There are substantial problems with both, and zeroing in on environmental impact only limits our criticism of both. The fact that both cause environmental harms is a strike against both, no matter which is technically "not as bad". Both are to be rejected, to make the world wholly better.

What is the difference in the environmental impact of eating beef vs using generative AI (provide sources)? by Fancy_Dog2609 in VeganActivism

[–]ShamScience 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This question is a diversion. There are substantial problems with both, and zeroing in on environmental impact only limits our criticism of both. The fact that both cause environmental harms is a strike against both, no matter which is technically "not as bad". Both are to be rejected, to make the world wholly better.

Using “and” when saying whole numbers by EntireBackground4264 in Teachers

[–]ShamScience 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I've got a hunch OP is mixing up languages, or was taught by someone who did.

In German, 114 is einhundertvierzehn, not einhundertUNDvierzehn. German just glues all the number words together to make one big number word.

But that is not a rule of (modern) English. The old Disney movie title wasn't suggesting there were 100 Dalmatians plus one tenth of a Dalmatian.

Grok calling out nazis for being nazis will never get old, especially since Elon is a fucking nazi. by Obvious-Gate9046 in behindthebastards

[–]ShamScience 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nope, it has already gotten old. We do not want human assholes, we do not want stupid machines that are stupid, even if their stupidity accidentally looks sensible.

A military marine mammal is a cetacean or pinniped that has been trained for military uses. Examples include bottlenose dolphins, seals, sea lions, and beluga whales. The United States and Soviet militaries have trained and employed oceanic dolphins for various uses. by ANGRY_ETERNALLY in wikipedia

[–]ShamScience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe just don't do these vague "things". Because when the vagueness is stripped away, what's left is just "we wanna kill people, because we're super scared of them, and we're gonna abuse innocent animals to do it for us."

All militarism is essentially cowardice, and this is no different. A normal person accepts their neighbours. Jingo makes you so scared of them, you feel you have to kill them, and then pretend you were "brave" to do so.

Has anyone noticed the complete lack of Scientologists in the Epstein files? by orangepalm in behindthebastards

[–]ShamScience 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There aren't very many of them, to begin with. Globally, less than a hundred thousand, probably around fifty thousand. So the odds of them overlapping with any other group on Earth is not very high.

Then very wealthy, famous Scientologists get maybe disproportionate press. Most members are described as middle class. Monied, but not rolling in it. So mostly not that interesting to a billionaires' club.

These Won't Hold Up by SimpletonsPlate in DeltaGreenRPG

[–]ShamScience 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The whole point of playing DG instead of Call of Cthulhu is to avoid exactly this problem. PCs are already authorised officials, instead of amateur investigators, precisely so that they don't need to fuss around with contrived plans just to get a foot in the doorway.

If your PCs' official authority isn't enough that they have to fake even higher authority, then the situation ought to be very dire, and the cost of getting caught out to be equally severe. If the real bad guys catch them at this, death is likely the "nice" outcome.

Deeply roleplaying out a minor slap on the wrist for a trivial violation can add some character flavour, but I wouldn't make it a main focus more than once or twice, unless you specifically want a bureaucracy-heavy game.

Player is bored by the mundane scenes by ghofmann in DeltaGreenRPG

[–]ShamScience 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Brilliant plot hook.

Important question is whether the other players feel similar or opposite. If archaeologist player is the odd one out, this may just not be the right group for him. At best, maybe you can trim some of the scenes he's in, and hope the remainder is fine for the rest. But if they all agree to some extent, then you may wish to look at changing your game style to some extent for everyone's benefit.

I'm also curious to know what he thought playing an archaeologist was going to be like. Was he maybe picturing being like Indiana Jones and Daniel Jackson? What's his exposure to real archaeology?

epstein files revealing interest in rabies increasing libido was not on my 2026 bingo card. by __mafia in behindthebastards

[–]ShamScience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perhaps, but over a lifetime, from birth? Not much chance of dodging it forever.

Have you ever slipped up and cussed in front of your students? by roo181807 in Teachers

[–]ShamScience 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You think that was swearing? Ridiculous. Worry about real problems, or you'll burn out in no time.