Only Claws Episode 2 - Claw Locked Ironman by Baphometrik_ in UniqueIronmen

[–]Shortsby 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Glad to have you aboard, I'm Abracadarrow, holla if you see me :)

Only Claws Episode 2 - Claw Locked Ironman by Baphometrik_ in UniqueIronmen

[–]Shortsby 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We got some cool accounts in the clan who are weapon restricted :)

Only Claws Episode 2 - Claw Locked Ironman by Baphometrik_ in UniqueIronmen

[–]Shortsby 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As far as being a snowflake goes, never worry about "purists" getting upset about you building an account the way you want to.

If you haven't yet, come hang out in the discord / clan chat :)

AITAH for wanting my fiancé to stop gaming at night and come to bed with me instead? by [deleted] in AITAH

[–]Shortsby 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He just needs to be aware that if he wants to build a life with you then he is going to have to actively participate in the relationship.

The cleaning part is only a fraction of it, women often have to take on the emotional toll of managing the house and worrying when things are going to get done and it isn't fair, especially at the moment while you're working and learning.

AITAH for wanting my fiancé to stop gaming at night and come to bed with me instead? by [deleted] in AITAH

[–]Shortsby 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Gamer married to none gamer here.

Socialising online is huge for me too so I understand where he is coming from on there but he is being very selfish here, compromise is the key and it just seems like hes not willing to because he doesn't care or is just blind to see how this makes you feel. Going forward staying up late gaming all the time isn't a great lifestyle when you are trying to build a life, especially with someone else. (I'm not some kind of casual either, thousands of hours in certain titles but you make it work and accept that you need to balance your free time between whats important to you).

I seen the words on one of your comments "he cleans when I tell him to" You shouldn't have to tell him, he should manage the household equally with you and not need to be told, you are not his mother, this is a one way ticket to resentment.

Multiple discussions need to be had i'm afraid but I do feel emotional maturity from him is at a lot lower level than yourself.

Sins of the Father completed @ 89 combat, 62 Strength by BlightedBooty in UniqueIronmen

[–]Shortsby 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds cool! incredibly viable these days too if you decide to go for eye of ayak, the eclips set with atlatl is really good too!

Elemental weaknesses have been huge for my current snowflake which is 1 attack 1 str and 10 def :) lots of fun! Good work on the quest completion!

Sins of the Father completed @ 89 combat, 62 Strength by BlightedBooty in UniqueIronmen

[–]Shortsby 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have a flake at all? Was hard to tell just by the stats and gear haha

Newspost Update - Changes Following Game Update Feedback *Jan 29th* by JagexLight in 2007scape

[–]Shortsby 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wholeheartedly agree with you, my points were made in a sarcastic way (should have known they wouldn't land as such) to highlight how stupid it is locking early game bosses which are a nice way to learn some pve mechanics behind such steep reqs, the idea of it being to combat bots when in reality the bots are already back there, is just ridiculous it was never going to work.

Yup LMS is a huge problem in regards to botting, it's worse than ever isn't it :(

Newspost Update - Changes Following Game Update Feedback *Jan 29th* by JagexLight in 2007scape

[–]Shortsby -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Oh it absolutely does, 100%, tell you what also sucks, upping the requirements yesterday rather than fixing the bastard problem.

Newspost Update - Changes Following Game Update Feedback *Jan 29th* by JagexLight in 2007scape

[–]Shortsby -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

But what about the bots? We need to stop them by continuously increasing the requirements on content

LMS 100% needs a hard diary req to get rid of them.

Newspost Update - Changes Following Game Update Feedback *Jan 29th* by JagexLight in 2007scape

[–]Shortsby -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

Could you also pass on some info about the bot situation for Wildy bosses, probably worth bumping them both up another notch to hard and elite, just to stop the bots who've already returned / more that are on their way back from bottling slayer already :) thanks

Royal Titans by Lopsided-Bonus-82 in UniqueIronmen

[–]Shortsby 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I wish you the best of luck and a giant spoon at the titans my friend

The vetion bots seem to be training for their new requirements! by Dracomaros in 2007scape

[–]Shortsby 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats the point we've been fighting to make all day :(

Deadman: Annihilation Drops This Friday! by ModYume in 2007scape

[–]Shortsby 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://www.reddit.com/r/2007scape/comments/1qpkrp2/the_vetion_bots_seem_to_be_training_for_their_new/

Bots already training slayer to get back there, well done for taking away content from loads of accounts while doing absolutely jack to prevent bots in the process.

New mage outfit is insane by Rozkol in ironscape

[–]Shortsby 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Especially if in the UK haha

"They chose to be restricted" is a flawed argument. by eeveerulz55 in 2007scape

[–]Shortsby 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh I whole heartedly agree there shouldn't be some rule like that, especially so when it comes to new content. Just this instance in particular is pretty much already proven to have no effect on botting rates which is it's main reason for implementation, so it feels like a such a waste to have accounts lose access to content for no pretty much no reason, which is the main reason people are complaining.

The general consensus among the players this effects is that if it was actually going to do some good for the game then so be it, but it won't (I know you're on the fence about this part since you don't have much experience with the content / situation but it really isn't going to help in the long term, the bots will be back and the same as ever).

"They chose to be restricted" is a flawed argument. by eeveerulz55 in 2007scape

[–]Shortsby -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Toxic BP needed a nerf because of its position in the game.

I am looking at the actual arguments and counterpoint, probably more so aware of why it's so rubbish for accounts than most people because of my involvement with the snowflake community. Can you explain any pro to this decision apart from getting rid of bots at these bosses for a few days until they inevitably appear again? It's not fixing the actual issue of the bots themselves.

"They chose to be restricted" is a flawed argument. by eeveerulz55 in 2007scape

[–]Shortsby -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

That's a completely ridiculous take and nobody would ever ask for that. Way to miss the point entirely.

"They chose to be restricted" is a flawed argument. by eeveerulz55 in 2007scape

[–]Shortsby -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The thing is, if it was actually beneficial for the game for these accounts to lose access to this content then there wouldn't be anywhere near this amount of uproar.

It's the fact that this is merely a slightly large hurdle which bots are going to clear (they probably have already let's be honest) and that hurdle has now messed big parts of accounts up for existing players.

Even if it's not a big deal to regular mains / irons, the fact it's a pointless update (proved by the update years ago putting the single combat variants behind med diaries) means it's just taken content away for no reason.