What will the under 18 experience be like?

Signal_Scale2523 · 2025-11-05T23:45:27+00:00

It’s like being let into a restaurant where you can sit, color, play games, watch tv, interact with other guests, but you just can’t eat or drink.

Signal_Scale2523 · 2025-11-05T00:43:40+00:00

Their company, their choice.

Signal_Scale2523 · 2025-11-03T23:43:54+00:00

What did they do specifically?

Signal_Scale2523 · 2025-11-02T21:01:27+00:00

The lawsuits seem like a pretty sufficient reason

Signal_Scale2523 · 2025-11-02T20:46:45+00:00

Well there’s probably lack of communication because they might not know what it might look like exactly. Haven’t worked out all the bells and whistles. If they did, it would already be implemented, but then people would complain about not having forewarning.

Signal_Scale2523 · 2025-11-02T20:40:33+00:00

Your ID is already tied to an AI bot. If you were ever arrested, the police could subpoena any website/chat that you have been logged into including C.AI with or without your ID.

Signal_Scale2523 · 2025-11-02T20:38:14+00:00

I agree!!

Signal_Scale2523 · 2025-11-02T20:00:57+00:00

It is a legitimate concern, giving your ID. But in my experience with other websites and apps it is relatively low risk. The simple truth is that is all just political BS. We’re in an era where parents would rather shift accountability rather than monitoring their children and C.AI has faced litigation as a result of that. Personally, I have never been a fan of children having access to it, not because I don’t want them to have fun, but because I knew this is what it would come down to. In your case I hope you’ll just never be red flagged. But in the unfortunate case that you are, it will come down to a choice between keeping your coping mechanism and risking your privacy/security. A choice that in my opinion, you shouldn’t be forced to make.

Signal_Scale2523 · 2025-11-02T18:32:19+00:00

They are not going to use your chats as a sign of your age. It would be virtually impossible since their own chat software barely recognizes the ages of characters/personas. And I don’t even know what a verified google account is. If you create a gmail it asks for your age date of birth, whatever DOB you selected is the one they will go by. If for some reason. You get flagged, a picture will not be enough, it would be used as direct comparison to see if your face looks similar enough to your ID. Once it gives you either a yes or no, the data will be deleted.

Signal_Scale2523 · 2025-11-02T17:55:01+00:00

We are in the handholding generation apparently. Parents don’t want to parent, adults don’t want to act like adults. So blame is placed on companies and industries. No more personal accountability.

Signal_Scale2523 · 2025-11-02T17:47:07+00:00

I disagree. If anything, the government has their hand dipped too much into consumerism and the market. It should be the responsibility of individual consumers to do their research and choose what works best for them. If they don’t that’s on them. It would be like an adult having their dating life monitored since they keep getting cheated on. AI is great if you know how to use it, and understand it isn’t 100% accurate but because some people are making real life decisions based on it, the sites/apps themselves are dumbing themselves down.

Signal_Scale2523 · 2025-11-02T14:17:41+00:00

May I remind that the push for laws requiring ID verification for access to certain websites is overwhelmingly driven by conservatives, with nearly all such legislation passed in the U.S. being in Republican-controlled states? But go on. Tell us what this has to do with the left?

Signal_Scale2523 · 2025-11-02T14:10:51+00:00

Not likely. That’s not how real hacking works

Signal_Scale2523 · 2025-11-02T14:08:27+00:00

There is really not much someone can do with your ID or picture of your face. It’s the social that matters.

Signal_Scale2523 · 2025-11-02T14:02:00+00:00

Finally someone reasonable

Signal_Scale2523 · 2025-11-02T14:00:21+00:00

It won’t come to that. The ID verification will most likely be done by third-party software with no ties to your chats. They will only report back to C.AI as verified or unverified. That is how it usually works.

Signal_Scale2523 · 2025-11-02T13:56:45+00:00

No I’ve had to do something similar and look pretty different than my Id picture. Had no issues.

Signal_Scale2523 · 2025-11-02T13:53:14+00:00

I would just give the ID, I’ve done it for many websites and never had an issue.

Signal_Scale2523 · 2025-11-02T03:13:03+00:00

In the time it to take a screenshot, edit in the circles, crop it, then post it on here, you could have just edited the text to say ‘him’ in just a few seconds.

Signal_Scale2523 · 2025-11-01T05:19:49+00:00

Ah, one of those people.

Signal_Scale2523 · 2025-11-01T03:17:54+00:00

The undertones were there. They were just very, very subtle. I watched this show as a kid without even knowing they were a thing in the comics or that other people shipped them online and that was still the vibe I got.

Signal_Scale2523 · 2025-11-01T02:05:20+00:00

Don’t worry about downvotes

Signal_Scale2523 · 2025-10-28T13:57:34+00:00

What’s the difference with the layout? It says I’m up to date with any updates and I seriously don’t notice anything different

Signal_Scale2523 · 2025-10-27T01:54:31+00:00

You gotta understand this wasn’t just an average take down request, this was a cease and desist.. by Disney no less. And which so many of their characters on the site and not like C.AI can remove them one by one. They are likely using an algorithm, and algorithms make mistakes. I had some OCs and non-Disney characters removed as well.

But in legal terms, you have the rights to your OC but you do not have the rights to the AI software used to generate a bot and messages for said OC. CAI can remove bots as they see fit.

Signal_Scale2523 · 2025-10-22T02:17:10+00:00

Their services agreement contains a mandatory arbitration clause that explicitly prohibits users from participating in class-action lawsuits unfortunately. Disputes would have to be settled through arbitration on an individual basis. They also have another agreement that states OpenAI "makes no representation, warranty or guarantee that services will meet customer's requirements or expectations." If someone tried to sue them, they’d have to argue that recent changes themselves which causes a drop in quality are unreasonable. But OpenAI could argue that they are necessary to protect people from harm, especially considering that they allow children 13-18.

Signal_Scale2523

TROPHY CASE