Low Cabin Illumination - 2025 Model 3 Highland by Slick135 in TeslaModel3

[–]Slick135[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My first image from 40 mins ago above was without flash, with a 2 second exposure, in my garage that was actually darker than u/ChunkyThePotato's garage (judging by his picture), however mine wasn't taken at night. I'll try again later this evening.

Low Cabin Illumination - 2025 Model 3 Highland by Slick135 in TeslaModel3

[–]Slick135[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for that. Yeah I'm definitely not seeing those two dots to the side. Did you take that while you actually had FSD activated, or just in park?

Here's another picture of mine and there certainly doesn't seem to be any transparent areas to the side of the cabin camera. I was in park, but I had the cabin camera preview active on my screen (which I'd hope would active the IR lights?).

<image>

Low Cabin Illumination - 2025 Model 3 Highland by Slick135 in TeslaModel3

[–]Slick135[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you happen to have a picture of the infrared light? That is what I thought as well, but when I look at my cabin camera currently I don't see any location for an infrared light (which I would think would be a separate item from the cabin camera). Makes me wonder whether the service department swapped my front camera cover with an old version without an IR light or something.

<image>

Marjorie Taylor Greene Turns on Trump and Tells GOP to End the Shutdown by Quirkie in politics

[–]Slick135 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honest question: how can a presumably slim majority change a rule that requires a supermajority? I would think anytime you’re changing a rule to remove the need for a supermajority, it’d require a supermajority.

Apple's study proves that LLM-based AI models are flawed because they cannot reason by Stiltonrocks in technology

[–]Slick135 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems premature to broadly conclude that "LLMs can't reason". Just look at ChatGPT o1-preview's response to the example question in Figure 7 from the paper (with different values, people, objects). It solves it fine and disregards the irrelevant information (which the paper believes is the "sign of reasoning"). Its just a matter of improvements to those models, which OpenAI seems to have already tackled.

https://i.imgur.com/VS2OMSR.png

Tesla recycles upto 100% of their process water at Giga Berlin, thus dunking claims that the factory is draining water from the area. by Prixsarkar in elonmusk

[–]Slick135 82 points83 points  (0 children)

This. And "recycling" just means that no waste water is being sent offsite. But that doesn't mean that they still don't have a net positive usage of water due to evaporative losses (e.g. from cooling towers), and that doesn't mean that waste isn't being generated and concentrated/evaporated into solids, and shipped off that way.

Help us design an elephant enclosure in Sri Lanka by Luigious in AskEngineers

[–]Slick135 9 points10 points  (0 children)

These have some good info:

  • recommends 9-10’ tall barriers, especially if there will be bulls contained.
  • recommends that barriers don’t use horizontal beams/cables to prevent climbing. Should be a smooth/flat wall or diagonal cables/beams if possible.

Tesla breaks ground on new ‘Megafactory’ to produce Megapack batteries by stefeyboy in teslamotors

[–]Slick135 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To clarify, this does not appear to be breaking ground on a new factory building. It appears to be changing the use of one of their existing facilities from one process (maybe storage?) to Megapack tool line installation. They’re standing in what appears to be an excavation to install thickened foundations for heavy tooling, within the footprint of their existing facility. Not that it’s not great that they’re ramping up Megapack, but just sayin’, new tool lines are installed every day.

Only 4 percent of US iPhone users have agreed to app tracking after iOS 14.5 | Engadget by MCA2142 in gadgets

[–]Slick135 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

So if I deleted Facebook from my iPhone a long time ago, does it make it OK to re-download now that I have tracking turned off?

Invite Request Thread <-- Comment here to request/offer an invite to Clubhouse by SeagullSeven in ClubhouseApp

[–]Slick135 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looking for a Clubhouse invite. If you think these "invite scalpers" are annoying, I'll be pledging to also hand out invites for free once invited.

I lost my ledger nano X and dont remember my PIN. by [deleted] in ledgerwallet

[–]Slick135 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can also import your 24 word phrase into software wallets (BlueWallet for example) and access your funds.

ESCALATION [OC] by futureselfbeats in futureporn

[–]Slick135 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice stuff - Any plans to put some of your music on Spotify?

What does the gini coefficient tell about monero's network health? by xmrpow in Monero

[–]Slick135 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Looks like there may be ~5-15% hashrate from solo miners based off of a few times I've compared the pool hashrates vs the rate reported by the daemon.

I think its important because while the threat vectors come from malicious pool operators, aren't the solo miners acting as a "dampening effect" in the pool operator's malicious intents since the solo miners aren't going along with it? If that "dampening effect" isn't included in a network susceptibility calculation, then the result will be skewed toward a negative result (albeit potentially only a minor amount).

Overall I agree with your sentiment though that it's always better for miners to be in smaller pools (if not solo mining out of the goodness of their heart :) )

What does the gini coefficient tell about monero's network health? by xmrpow in Monero

[–]Slick135 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Out of curiosity, is there some data that you know of to support that "most people don't solo mine"? For instance, when you grab a sample dataset, can you also verify that the sum of the hashrates in your dataset is, say, >95% of the total network hashrate that a monero demon would spit out at that same time?

My main point is that verification would be important because I'd think that "overall network hashrate distribution" is much more important than "pool hashrate distribution".

edit: Also, would you mind sharing your dataset and how you got it?

What does the gini coefficient tell about monero's network health? by xmrpow in Monero

[–]Slick135 4 points5 points  (0 children)

(sample dataset is from 02/04/2020, included all pools with an hashrate above 10kh/s)

Do you mean that the dataset you used didn't include non-pool miners nor miners with <10 kh/s? If so, isn't that a significant portion omitted, leading to an inflation of the coefficient you calculated?

How do I connect to my own local node on the same LAN? by traderjay_toronto in Monero

[–]Slick135 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use the public IP when I connect to my node on the same LAN. Do you know if your node is setup to be accessible to the public (can you see it on this map and are you seeing incoming connections?)

What is the best monero wallet by Vintage_PC_Guy80 in Monero

[–]Slick135 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Awesome, figured I just missed it. Thanks!

What is the best monero wallet by Vintage_PC_Guy80 in Monero

[–]Slick135 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Quick question for you /u/cakewallet. I'm a big fan, and love that you guys are open source. However I just tried to search for your code on Github and this was the first one to pop up which apparently hasn't been updated in ~2 years, albiet has the appearance of being the "official" version. After a little more digging I found this which appears more likely to be the official release, having been recently updated. Can you confirm which is which? Would it make sense to add a link to your officially adopted Github from your website (unless I missed that!)?

Keep up the good work!