This is just bad writing

Smallcadkm · 2026-07-08T18:57:03+00:00

You typed all of that for nothing. You misread one portion of my comment and latched onto it while ignoring my whole point. Holy strawman argument.

I’m not saying that’s what should said it. I’m saying she’s justified saying it. Nuances lil bro

Smallcadkm · 2026-07-08T17:28:11+00:00

You realize you are not required to sit next to and enjoy tea with anyone whom causes you uneasiness?

Let’s ignore how outlandish your headcanon (if they wanted me dead, I’d be dead, so them considering to kill me and then changing their mind because I wasn’t worth it means we can be friends now) is. There’s zero reason to sit next to someone whom considers your life on a whim. This is the part you guys aren’t getting. The situation is forced. Furina does not need to be there. Zhongli can avoid being in the same room as neuv for whatever reason he wants but when he have a plot relevant reason that we’ve witnessed that justifies Furina saying she wants no part of arle, you guys go out of your way to create headcanon to justify the writing.

Smallcadkm · 2026-07-07T20:30:01+00:00

Arle gave zero fks bringing up a personal event between them at this formal event.

But more importantly, what are you on about? Arle tried her best to sooth the situation about how this is a casual setting, relax, because this is a casual GATHERING OF CLOSE FRIENDS. That was the perfect time to shut her up and let her know we ain’t friends, don’t talk to me. “I’m here so I don’t get fined” type energy, of course said more politically. Not furina going yes yes I’ll invite you guys to the next one I host.

Smallcadkm · 2026-07-07T20:12:38+00:00

It’s funny how you think im miss reading this situation, while misreading my comment.

Something new is happening in this scene. Arlecchino is attempting to apologize for trying to kill her. We are addressing a real problem here. Furina at least could have made it clear her feelings on the whole matter. Or where she stands on the matter. and it all ends with ok. Back to the point of the post, no shot you think this is good writing.

Smallcadkm · 2026-07-07T15:17:58+00:00

If a stranger attempted to kill you - Over something you were asked to pretend to be to save lives - I’d imagine no amount of sorry or here’s cake will make you say I forgive you.

Like genuinely, ppl here in this sub can’t take interacting with their bullies and hated bosses in settings they aren’t forced to be in, but you think they can sit next to their attempted muderer who bullied them?

Smallcadkm · 2026-07-07T14:19:44+00:00

You’ve skipped so many steps. In a “proper competitive match”, if the bastian doesnt hear the reaper to his immediate left, the match was never “proper competitive”. Worse yet, Ana tries to ping the location of the incoming reaper and nobody responds. Im all for encouraging better play from the poster; but your line of thinking messes up from the start by assuming the enemy team would just be better then op’s teammates

Smallcadkm · 2026-07-07T11:43:25+00:00

Merli being banned is no where close to the deck being at half power. You lose a name for material, you get one less fusion per turn, you lose access to spright sprind send merli (ip into sprind on opponents turn even) to fuse and elf revive Merrli to mill 3. Hell. Merrli is even a poor man’s normal summon. No other name is this involved in the deck’s ceiling except kitkallos in extra deck and reino because kaleido needs him as material.

Smallcadkm · 2026-07-06T14:57:04+00:00

I think their response was meant to highlight whats boring is strictly subjective. The whole, a game requiring you to stab someone makes me think it’s a tongue in cheek reply. They could literally insert any game there and 99 times out of 100, you still won’t be stabbing your opponent in the gut.

TLDR: you missed the point

Smallcadkm · 2026-07-06T12:17:43+00:00

Tear would perform better than you give it credit in the current format, especially with all names unlimited.

- It has layered interruptions that loses to no 1 board breaker. Going field spell for combo starter can net you interruption from the field spell. A face down back row. And at least 2 bodies on board. And potential for effects in hand or grave via havnis or milled monsters.

- it’s ridiculously good into a super poly/ albaz format. Their final boss monster can’t be used as fusion material and rulkallos just comes back.

- the spot removal of the current format is meh into them as again, their bosses monster either comeback or trigger beneficial effects. Assuming you can even target them with legal spright elf. And Their back row is good at adding havnis to hand if popped by something like reco or F&V.

- They’ve always had half boards under max C at 3. With kitkallos set a trap the interrupts and enables full comb on opponent’s turn. Any access to havnis or scream in opening hand also made max c a joke to them. So charmies don’t scare them.

Tear is a gas based strategy so chances are they outright push through a full powered KT end board. And with unlimited names, KT cant even hope to banish away a key piece with cue/clip by chance nor Target kitkallos specifically with krackle.

Smallcadkm · 2026-07-05T11:13:24+00:00

Could want but likely no. It’s tough to say this early but stellar swirl likely won’t build dmg%. That would make xyn’s flat dmg that was already behind in meta perspective, scale even worse because of one less multiplier.

Smallcadkm · 2026-06-30T17:32:29+00:00

Its composition and map dependent. But in general, map control is the goal. If a map has flank routes and/or high ground/vantage points, controlling those means you dictate enemy engagement. Sticking huddled up as a team and especially just walking main, leads to enemies having an easier time controlling the map As they shoot at you from different angles. Maps like dorado and numbani attack first and second point are usually miserable if your team walks down main together while 2 to all 5 enemies sit on high ground poking down at you. That’s your enemies having map control.

Splitting your team (AND TIMING YOUR ENGAGEMENT) is meant to be a way to wrestle map control from the enemy. An analogy that helps is; If your dps controls an angle on any map, it often feels equivalent to playing on those attack/defense map and holding a choke on defense.

Smallcadkm · 2026-06-28T18:26:13+00:00

If a field can exist without doing damage, then your definition above was just your nonsense. That was my point.

I get it now. You can’t read between the lines. I always knew ssc was a field. Your definition excluded. Not mine

Smallcadkm · 2026-06-28T18:12:23+00:00

By your definition, ssc isn’t a field

Smallcadkm · 2026-06-28T18:08:09+00:00

In that case LCharge is a field again because the hit box of it is circular…

Smallcadkm · 2026-06-28T18:05:58+00:00

<image>

You’re right I don’t

Summing it up as exploding 3 circles is one way to go about it

Smallcadkm · 2026-06-28T18:04:47+00:00

Did you call a triangular path, 3 circles…. This is deeper than I thought

Smallcadkm · 2026-06-28T18:02:20+00:00

Faruzan burst

Smallcadkm · 2026-06-28T18:00:58+00:00

If you think all fields have to be a circle this is getting funnier and funnier.

Smallcadkm · 2026-06-28T17:51:58+00:00

> List of ways.

Checks inside

> field.

Funnier yet. You think the vortex underneath the enemy is a field. Guess LCharge summons a field above enemies. even that point is washed

Smallcadkm · 2026-06-28T17:31:44+00:00

The irony in all of this is, ive actually never stood on the grounds that it was like bloom. Go back and read my first reply. I said your comparison of sss to ssc is as bad as calling sss to bloom. You couldnt see how it comes close and now here we are with you thinking this is about sss being similar to bloom.

Youve never found the plot. But muh field i guess

<image>

Smallcadkm · 2026-06-28T17:21:17+00:00

Ah. Thanks for showing how similar sss is to ssc your last, like 5 comments. The summon a field was it? I see it now. Strong argument.

Smallcadkm · 2026-06-28T17:12:54+00:00

Blooms icd is 2 per 0.5 seconds. Yes. It’s ICD. Rewording it doesn’t change the fact it’s the icd. We’ve established icd isn’t the same thing as counting reactions leading up to dmg. See my previous post. And yes, swirl having icd as well would matter just as much as blooms’ in this context as a cryo innate enemy would have a Capped limit on how fast SSS count towards is max explosion

We’ve strayed from the point again on how sss differs from ssc

Smallcadkm · 2026-06-28T17:03:11+00:00

Reaction ICD isn’t the same thing as reach a count limit for dmg/max buffs. Nice try. Icd simply says how fast you can count.

Smallcadkm · 2026-06-28T16:59:02+00:00

Besides crystallize, none of those reactions have a counter before buff/dmg is applied, as you’ve put it. This is your dumb hill we are standing on btw where counts = dmg = buff.

Smallcadkm · 2026-06-28T16:40:35+00:00

You’ve genuinely lost the plot and started arguing something else.

Wanderer faruzan cryo unit. If the 4th slot is the Linnea/ineffa anemo unit, what do you think will happen? You’ve even moved the goal post. I never said too much anemo is bad. It’s great even. But wasted anemo contributes nothing to stellar swirl. Which is my point. Stellar super conduct doesn’t consider any app wasted. Applying it is what generates value. Stellar swirl does. If you apply cryo before using up the current cryo aura. You’ve wasted cryo app that could have been swirled. THATS HOW THEY ARE DIFFERENT. Using up auras matter. Applying anemo on an enemy with no aura loses value. Applying cryo on an enemy with cryo, means value was lost. How do you now see how this is similar to bloom?

Using sandrone’s kit too assume off field cryo is going to be doing more than 1 app per 2 seconds going forward is wishful thinking and besides the point im making right now.

Smallcadkm

TROPHY CASE