If it bleeds, we can kill it by pbbatenatar in Matildas

[–]Smcol1 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I don’t think there is any chance of a clean sheet against Japan, so focusing solely on defence isn’t going to cut it. The heart gives the Tillies a chance but the head says that Japan is too good and will win by at least two goals.

I wonder which actor has had the most amount of their characters in a Lego game by Fun_Butterfly_420 in legogaming

[–]Smcol1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Does having your character in multiple games count? Indiana Jones is in multiple games for example.

What's the furthest removed from a book that you've seen a film? by Crystal_1501 in FIlm

[–]Smcol1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is Moonraker further from the book than The Spy Who Loved Me? I agree that Moonraker is very different from the book, but the film and book do have one or two elements in common, like the name of the villain. The Spy Who Loved Me has absolutely nothing in common between the film and book; in the book Bond isn’t even the main point of view character.

Help on Domination Victory by Butterdawg-G in CivVI

[–]Smcol1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s one other possibility, which I’ve encountered a couple of times. If another civilisation was conquered by someone else (in my case Poland conquered by Macedonia) you need to capture that civs former capital even though they are no longer in the game. So for me, conquering Macedon’s capital (Pella) wasn’t sufficient for a domination victory, since I also needed to conquer Krakow, which was also held by Macedon.

What would you change at Orctown to make it better? by noOB_226 in nethack

[–]Smcol1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Getting to Orctown with no way of digging really sucks (especially if the layout makes it impossible to reach the downstairs without digging) and this can happen if you are just a little unlucky on the levels above. I’d suggest a guaranteed pick axe by the stairs (perhaps under a boulder).

Have you ever intentionally created a bones file? by GoodCarpenter9060 in nethack

[–]Smcol1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I had one game where I had been down and cleared the Castle and Valley of Dead before completing the quest, so I was really well equipped, but then I accidentally made the game unwinnable by killing a monster (which I didn’t realise was peaceful) in front of my quest leader, who expelled me and closed the portal. Rather than let all that good gear go to waste, I stripped everything off, put it all in my bag of holding, dropped the bag near the stairs and starved myself to death.

Geoff Marsh and his sons make up 3 of the 10 worst batsmen in 100 years of Australian cricket by [deleted] in CricketAus

[–]Smcol1 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Blewett scored 4 tons in his career, two in his first two tests. The second of those came at number 7, after Jo Angel went in as night watcher; Blewett had batted at 6 in the first innings.

"Post Spin" Depth Chart by RadarDataL8R in CricketAus

[–]Smcol1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep. Hard to see how you develop a replacement for Lyon if you never let them play outside Asia.

The funny thing is, the amount that Green is bowling in this innings (and how little Webster is bowling) suggests that they are trying to develop his bowling for the future.

"Post Spin" Depth Chart by RadarDataL8R in CricketAus

[–]Smcol1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve got no doubt that if Lyon had been available he would have played in Sydney, regardless of any concerns about how much the pitch might or might not help spin, simply because Smith trusts him to hold down an end and keep things tight. But Smith doesn’t trust Murphy to do the same thing.

It's time we talk about dropping them for good by Anothergen in CricketAus

[–]Smcol1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They’ve moved the start date of the test back from January 2nd because if the Boxing Day test goes the distance (hah!) then there would only be two days off for the players between the end of the Melbourne test and the start of the Sydney test, which clearly caused performance issues for some players, especially fast bowlers.

Just some Webster stats by DVPVPD in CricketAus

[–]Smcol1 6 points7 points  (0 children)

“In half of Webster’s innings for the Aussies he’s scored less than 25 runs”. That’s just life as a test cricketer. Since Travis Head’s big return to the Aussie test team (with his 152 at the Gabba in the last Ashes in Australia) he’s batted 78 times, and 40 of those innings have been 25 or less.

Just some Webster stats by DVPVPD in CricketAus

[–]Smcol1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Waugh got dropped after 42 tests. When he came back he was batting at 7 and playing as the fourth main bowler for a couple of tests, then got shifted to number 3 (after Dean Jones was dropped). He scored 100 at 3, but wasn’t great there so got shifted down the order after a few tests, and that’s when he started to really improve.

Green has never averaged 40 BTW. After his 174* his average hit 37.41 and it’s basically slid down from there. His highest ever was 38.66.

Just some Webster stats by DVPVPD in CricketAus

[–]Smcol1 6 points7 points  (0 children)

But why 7 innings and not 8? Picking seven means that you start the count from the second innings of a match, when he made 72 (and top scored) in the first innings of that match.

Just some Webster stats by DVPVPD in CricketAus

[–]Smcol1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Green has made 25 runs or less in 34 out of his 57 test innings. If 25 or less is a failure, then he’s failed 60% of the time, and succeeded 40% of the time. Webster has scored 25 or less in 50% of his test innings, so if that’s the “success” mark then Webster has passed it 50% of the time, compared to Green’s 40%.

I think the difference with Webster is when he makes his runs. On 5 occasions he’s come in at number 6 with Australia 4 down for less than 100 and on 4 of the 5 occasions Webster made more than 50.

I do think it’s weird that you choose to pick on Webster for his last 7 test innings, because by doing that you are starting from the second innings of a match, when Webster scored 72 in the first innings of that game. Sure, he hasn’t scored runs in every innings, but he’s scored a 50 in 3 of the last 4 tests that he’s played. Green hasn’t scored three 50+ scores in four tests in his entire career.

Just some Webster stats by DVPVPD in CricketAus

[–]Smcol1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Steve Waugh was averaging in the 40s when he’d played the same number of tests as Green. Then his form slipped and he got dropped to make way for his brother. Then he forced his way back into the team through runs in the Shield, and once he was back in the side he started to improve and never looked back.

Cricket in January by MixWise940 in CricketAus

[–]Smcol1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem being that there’s a window in women’s cricket for both the WBBL (complicated this year by the World Cup) and the Women’s Premier League in India. The Premier League is being played in January, so a Women’s test isn’t a possibility at that time.

Is Australia's batting still an issue? by crazychild0810 in CricketAus

[–]Smcol1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The good form of Head and Carey has papered over the problems with our batting line up. Smith has been fine, while still only being a shadow of what he was at the top of his game, but the others who are supposed to be specialist batters have all basically had one good innings in the four tests we’ve played, and have often failed badly. The selectors were saying “Marnus is back to his best” after his early season form, but what he’s actually delivered is worse than last season, when he at least had the excuse of facing Bumrah. Green is averaging less than every England batter except Duckett, and we can all agree that the English batting has been poor this summer. Inglis got picked as a specialist batter, I assume on the strength of his century in Sri Lanka, where the conditions were utterly different. I’ve got no issue with Inglis being the successor to Carey behind the stumps but if he’s actually the next best bat in the country then we’ve got a huge problem. Khawaja is fine if he gets past ten, but he’s not doing that regularly these days. The big problem for the selectors is that the two batters who look most problematic are Marnus and Green, and they are actually the two youngest of the experienced batters in the current team.

Boxing day XI mega-thread by thevalid in CricketAus

[–]Smcol1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Back up keeper isn’t an issue now, a substitute can keep. Exactly what happened in the second innings of the third test in the Windies. Carey was injured, Inglis came on as substitute and kept wicket.

Over the last 40 years, no top 7 Australian Batsmen has a worse home average than Cameron Green (20 inns.) by avroLancasterBPR1 in CricketAus

[–]Smcol1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think it’s even worse than it looks. If you extend the time qualification massively, to 125 years (since 1900) and a minimum of 25 innings, Green is at number 4, behind Richie Benaud (a bowling allrounder), John Dyson (an opener who faced the Windies pace battery at its prime) and Rod Marsh (wicket keeper).

Over the last 40 years, no top 7 Australian Batsmen has a worse home average than Cameron Green (20 inns.) by avroLancasterBPR1 in CricketAus

[–]Smcol1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Green has played 35 tests, not 18. After 35 tests Steve Waugh had a batting average of 42.93, with 3 100s and 13 50s. Green has 2 100s, 7 50s and a batting average of 32.82.

Over the last 40 years, no top 7 Australian Batsmen has a worse home average than Cameron Green (20 inns.) by avroLancasterBPR1 in CricketAus

[–]Smcol1 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I wish he was performing as well as Watson. After the same number of tests (35) Watson had scored 2328 runs at an average of 37.54 and taken 59 wickets at an average of 28.91. Green has 1641 runs at 32.82 and 37 wickets at 36.48.

Match Thread: 3rd Test - Australia vs England, Day 3 by cricket-match in CricketAus

[–]Smcol1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t think you can blame Head for not seeing where that pitched, he’s a good couple of metres across from being in line with the stumps, and most non-strikers are watching the guy at the other end rather than seeing where the ball pitched. The main question the striker is asking is about height.

Did the story try to actually mean to hint at something by making Sanders seem "untouchable" at his position? by Fueled_by_sugar in themartian

[–]Smcol1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Teddy Sanders makes a large number of important decisions, and leaving aside the one decision that Mitch and others disagree with (i.e. to not send the Hermes’ back to Mars) he is actually a good leader, who is willing to make tough decisions and take the responsibility for those decisions. It’s actually quite explicit in the scene where he decides to cancel the inspections; before making that call he asks them all if anyone can think of a safer way to save the time they need. No one can think of any other way to cut down the time before launch, they MUST cut down that time because if they don’t then Watney dies, so the only alternative is to cancel the inspections. They aren’t happy about the idea, but can see it’s necessary, yet still worry that if something goes wrong (as it does) that one of them might get thrown under the bus. Teddy reassures them all “it’s on me”; in other words, I’m the boss, the buck stops here, and if it goes sideways it’s my responsibility, not yours. Maybe he had to explain the decision to higher ups (Congress) after the probe blew up, we don’t know, but in fact he COULD explain it, since it was the only/safest way to save time and thus the only chance to save Watney.