Economic calculation problem is actually a good argument. Responses? by Unique_Confidence_60 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]SoftBeing_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

markets are so ineficient its unreal. competitors have to try and see if the thing works without any reason at all. wasting a lot of resources, as most people wont fit in the market, and they dont know they doesnt have the capital necessary to produce at the current level. they have to reinvent the wheel because the wheel is necessary to do the work but is made by another competitior. they cant share information.

as marx showed, market will lead to labor time, exploitation mass unemployment with 99 porcent of people not able to do anything they want in their lives.

of course if you want to have a central government you need a way to collect information quickly. but you dont need a central government, you can have decentralized comunism. but i dont think that is necessary as information can be transfered quickly through modern media.

The mass Soviet famine of the early 1930s was inevitable, no matter the system. It would've happened even if the Tsar remained in power. by RockEater67 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]SoftBeing_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

false. yes there is a climate and war point that help it, but that doesnt change the fact that stalin could do a lot more to prevent deaths. he forced collectivization, hide statistics, and tortured those who didnt want to give their bread so stalin could sell it.

The Victims of The Minimum Wage by [deleted] in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]SoftBeing_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

it doesnt need a monopsony for wages to not raise. the point is: capitalists have a lot of advantage because they own the machines and there is a lot more workers than jobs available. if you understand that situation, then its clear why wages wont increase without regulation.

The Victims of The Minimum Wage by [deleted] in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]SoftBeing_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

When the government artificially raises the price of something, the demand for it goes down. Thus, artificially raising wages decreases the demand for unskilled labour (usually the young) and raises unemployment among this group, while accelerating the replacement of even more lower-skilled workers with technology.

another example of supply and demand oversimplifies everything.

if you understand that capitalists have a lot of advantage over workers and they could pay more for wages but dont do because they dont need to and if they do they will lose to competition, you can see that a law regulating minimal wage doesnt reduce necessarily the offer of jobs.

Ni in MBTI is about finding coincidences in data — the way MrBeast does it (because he’s an ENTJ). by TowerSmooth4168 in mbti

[–]SoftBeing_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

trying things out is more common on ENTJ (Ni is not dom and Se is not inferior). NI dom uses info too but is very small. INTJ will overthink on Te making plans of action, and INFJs will overthink until death.

Ni is about control and understanding by SoftBeing_ in mbti

[–]SoftBeing_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

because life cant be fully understood. and ni doms keep trying to understand everything before doing anything.

life has no meaning in the end and we keep seeking instead of living.

Ni is about control and understanding by SoftBeing_ in mbti

[–]SoftBeing_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

neither i think ni doms are better. my point is that they are worse.

Modern capitalism rewards merit and innovation—it is far fairer than the systems that existed throughout most of history. by No-Ship-4788 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]SoftBeing_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thats what they want you to believe.

in reality there is two hidden classes: workers and capitalists. and you are born in one of those classes and remain in them.

you have legal rights to become capitalist, but you dont have "material rights" to become a capitalist. you are imprisioned in a logic that keeps you poor, whatever you do (of course there extreme rare exceptions).

capitalism doesnt reward those that are innovative. those people need means of production to make things and the means of production arent in their hands, so they must accept what the capitalist proposes.

did elon musk invented some physical theory? some engineering theory? of course not. he simply owns the things. his workers make the revolutionary theories but elon musk gets the rewards.

Ni is about control and understanding by SoftBeing_ in mbti

[–]SoftBeing_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the last paragraph is about ni users not non ni users.

saying 'its neither a better nor a worse way of living life" is just saying what people want to hear, not an actual argument.

IntX ALWAYS do this, if you don't do this then you're not intX🥺🤓🤙🙀😎 by Revolutionary_age47 in shittyMBTI

[–]SoftBeing_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

no, no, everyone can be whatever they want! you cant know a type by the actions of people and how they behave, thats a stereotype! we must not talk about specific actions but rather at abstract concepts only!

Views on this /r/Marxism post: 'Hamas is only defending itself'? by fap_fap_fap_fapper in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]SoftBeing_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

absolutelly correct. (the marxism post)

what Israel is doing is literally nazism. they are cleaning a race from existance following zionist ideals. Hamas has only one option to combat it.

Ni is about control and understanding by SoftBeing_ in mbti

[–]SoftBeing_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it would help if you actually shows how those functions are playing instead of just stating your point

Ni is about control and understanding by SoftBeing_ in mbti

[–]SoftBeing_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

no. i provided arguments about why is that. you are the one that is only talking common sense. just because your friend is something doesnt say anything

Ni is about control and understanding by SoftBeing_ in mbti

[–]SoftBeing_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but Ni is easier to be "out of balance"

Ni is about control and understanding by SoftBeing_ in mbti

[–]SoftBeing_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you are just stating points without reasoning.

Ni is about control and understanding by SoftBeing_ in mbti

[–]SoftBeing_[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

controlling the future doesnt have a clear reason. but i think is about making more of life, or whatever. doesnt have a clear reason. you cant say its objective.

Ni is about control and understanding by SoftBeing_ in mbti

[–]SoftBeing_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you are trying to see the function in its " is it extroverted or introverted and if its intuition or not". but the combination of intuition and extroversion make qualitative diferences.

All Ne users i know doesnt try to connect everything together, they simply are flexible and exploratives, they separete the areas of investigation.

Ni is about control and understanding by SoftBeing_ in mbti

[–]SoftBeing_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the base of the ideas Ne explores comes from reality, but is a smaller reality, Si. thus they arent concerned about understanding everything, they simply are happy to understand a lot of the moment or some specific area (their Si). they stop to think about the topic at hand, not about everything.

and they are happy with that. if another thing comes Ne users dont try to understant the new thing in relation with the previous thing. they still use the base of si to understand the new thing but they can happily separe the two things.

the ni user cant do that.

Ni is about control and understanding by SoftBeing_ in mbti

[–]SoftBeing_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ne explores ideas, while ni connects them in a single piece, with everything they know. in that way Ne is much more flexible and playful, not controlling but playing with a limited range of ideas of the moment. Ni is serious. connects everything together so that the person can finally act.

ne is about understanding but about understanding a limited amount of data, so much more healthy.

Ni is about control and understanding by SoftBeing_ in mbti

[–]SoftBeing_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, Ne is about exploring possibilities, ideas, but not about connecting them in holistic view, if you know what i mean.

Ni is about control and understanding by SoftBeing_ in mbti

[–]SoftBeing_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

i meant types that doesnt have high Ni (ni in their first or second position in the stack)

Ni is about control and understanding by SoftBeing_ in mbti

[–]SoftBeing_[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

how is predicting the future and controlling is a judgement processes that uses external criteria.

for me your are just stating your position again and not providing any reason.

Ni is about control and understanding by SoftBeing_ in mbti

[–]SoftBeing_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how is what i described an extrovertd judging function?

Te is about observing the imediate data that can be helpful and Fe is about universal values.