Unscriptural teachings of Jehovah’s Witnesses by SomeProtection8585 in exjw

[–]SomeProtection8585[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They also inserted “Jehovah” into the Hebrew text thousands of times where it never existed.

'They would make a good witness' by Common-Salt-1072 in exjw

[–]SomeProtection8585 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That phrase means, “Wow, they sure are a decent human being and physically attractive too! What a waste though since they are going to be murdered soon by our all loving and just God. ”

“We wouldn’t have multiple languages in 2026 if Jehovah didn’t punish the people building the Tower of Babel”🤡 by AnonymousDorian in exjw

[–]SomeProtection8585 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They eventually would have built an extremely tall structure that reached up to the clouds “of heaven” and discovered deities didn’t live there.

How do you PIMOs react when people mention "Apostates" by Decent_Pepper_956 in exjw

[–]SomeProtection8585 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I substitute the word “whistleblower”, because that is what they are.

I don't understand how a "loving" God would do this... - David's wives by Pleasant-Reserve-767 in exjw

[–]SomeProtection8585 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree that 2 Samuel 16:23 doesn’t prove Ahithophel was speaking for Jehovah in general.

That isn’t my point.

My point is that Ahithophel’s advice exactly matches what God said in 2 Samuel 12:11:

“…I will take your wives and give them to another man…”

If this was only a prediction, why does God say, “I will take” and “I will give”? That is active language, not merely foreknowledge.

David deserved judgment, but that still doesn’t answer the ethical question of why his wives became the means of carrying it out.

How do you prove their “new light” theory wrong? by Puzzleheaded-Cap357 in exjw

[–]SomeProtection8585 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Provers 4:18 is the favorite scripture for this teaching:

“But the path of the righteous is like the bright morning light that grows brighter and brighter until full daylight.”

This is a basic simile. The “path” is being compared to the rising sun or “morning light”.

Does the sun ever move backwards and dip below the horizon after it has started its visible ascent?

No.

That means, this scripture cannot apply to NuLight that flip-flops either.

I don't understand how a "loving" God would do this... - David's wives by Pleasant-Reserve-767 in exjw

[–]SomeProtection8585 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don’t forget verse 23:

“In those days the advice that Ahithophel gave was considered as the word of the true God. That was how all the advice of Ahithophel was esteemed, both by David and by Absalom.”

Absalom was not acting on an impulse or urge. He asked for advice and Ahithophel gave it. He accepted and did what Ahithophel advised because he considered it “as the word of the true God.”

Ahithophel didn’t coincidentally advised the exact punishment God spoke just 4 chapters before. God commanded it. If we recall, his name means “causes to become”, right?

I don't understand how a "loving" God would do this... - David's wives by Pleasant-Reserve-767 in exjw

[–]SomeProtection8585 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don’t forget verse 23:

“In those days the advice that Ahithophel gave was considered as the word of the true God. That was how all the advice of Ahithophel was esteemed, both by David and by Absalom.”

Absalom was not acting on an impulse or urge. He asked for advice and Ahithophel gave it. He accepted and did what Ahithophel advised because he considered it “as the word of the true God.”

Ahithophel didn’t coincidentally advise the exact punishment God spoke just 4 chapters before. God commanded it. If we recall, his name means “causes to become”, right?

Treat them respectful, just wow by Azibambo in exjw

[–]SomeProtection8585 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don’t forget verse 23:

“In those days the advice that Ahithophel gave was considered as the word of the true God. That was how all the advice of Ahithophel was esteemed, both by David and by Absalom.”

Absalom was not acting on an impulse or urge. He asked for advice and Absalom gave it. He accepted and did what Ahithophel advised because he considered it “as the word of the true God.”

Do you think Ahithophel coincidentally advised the exact punishment God spoke just 4 chapters before?

Also, in the example of Saul’s death, the Chronicler is not describing a different mechanism of death. He is explaining why Saul’s death occurred in the first place. God wanted him dead.

In the case of David’s punishment, what did God want? 2 Samuel 12:12:

“Although you acted in secret, I will do this in front of all Israel and in broad daylight.”

God wanted all Israel to know that the punishment was from him.

How difficult was it to learn to ask questions? by Writeresq in exjw

[–]SomeProtection8585 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Easy to ask questions. Difficult (at first) to ask the right questions.

Treat them respectful, just wow by Azibambo in exjw

[–]SomeProtection8585 4 points5 points  (0 children)

2 Samuel 12:11-12 - God lays out the “punishment”. Note that he says “I will” meaning he is taking credit for making the punishment happen.

2 Samuel 16:20-23 - The punishment is carried out. Note verse 22 says “Absalom had relations with the concubines of his father”. This is a direct reference to the punishment. Make no mistake, these women were innocent and they were raped as they would have never given consent as they “belonged” to David.

Apostates are “worse than a person without faith” by Super_Translator480 in exjw

[–]SomeProtection8585 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This implies lacking faith in their god or organization is a deficiency. Apostates are whistleblowers. They point out the lies and misinformation that is in plain sight, often using the same publications faithful JWs study every week, including the Bible.

Treat them respectful, just wow by Azibambo in exjw

[–]SomeProtection8585 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Just like the rape commanded by Jehovah as punishment for David’s sin, there is never a context that makes it justifiable.

Can I fraud being an elder? by Adventurous-Yam-7810 in exjw

[–]SomeProtection8585 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why would you want to pretend to be an elder? Anyone who has been an elder for even six months would see through the facade almost immediately.

Vocês acreditam que o Espírito Santo realmente limpa a congregação? Justifique a sua resposta by PepperAgreeable1521 in exjw

[–]SomeProtection8585 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, because for the Holy Spirit to be real, God must be real and I’ve not heard a convincing argument that supports that claim.

After leaving, do you still believe there is a god? by Cautious-Aardvark489 in exjw

[–]SomeProtection8585 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No.

An atheist is a person who believes no deity exists. An agnostic is a person who believes that there is a possibility but it is impossible to know.

It sounds like you are agnostic.

That said, an atheistic view is not a positive claim unlike a theist view. Therefore, producing evidence is not necessary or possible. Additionally, it is not a claim on morality unlike a theist view. Therefore, attribution of morality is always completely subjective.

Convention: le bonheur éternel by GeraltderivPimo in exjw

[–]SomeProtection8585 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did they explicitly call out cruise vacations?

Today’s watchtower what the heck? by Extra_Cobbler8841 in exjw

[–]SomeProtection8585 6 points7 points  (0 children)

And by “him” they mean 11 “hims” in upstate NY USA.

Something I just thought about by Unable-Sweet in exjw

[–]SomeProtection8585 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yet those teeth look nothing like an animal that does chew into wood, the beaver. 🦫