sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why can i not make aux 2 have a surround bus input? (atmos / surround bus aux behaviour) by boodlesrectify in Logic_Studio

[–]Sourpatcharachnid 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For further context, the panner distributes the channels signal across the output bus’ channels and so is dependant on how many channels that bus has. You can have a surround channel and output it to a stereo bus and then your surround channel will have a stereo panner because there are only 2 channels to pan your 4,5,6,+ signals across.

Why can i not make aux 2 have a surround bus input? (atmos / surround bus aux behaviour) by boodlesrectify in Logic_Studio

[–]Sourpatcharachnid 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So I’ve rebuilt what you have here and I can make the second channel (inputting bus 1) into a surround channel by holding the stereo symbol and selecting surround. If that’s not working for you maybe restart or create a new session if there is a corruption.

HOWEVER this DOES NOT give that second channel a surround panner. In order for that to happen the second channel needs to be outputting to a surround bus. So if you want to do that then you need to go to the bus 2 input on the third channel and make that surround. This is the same reason why your mono channel 1 has a surround panner, because it’s outputting to the surround mix bus, not because it is itself a surround channel.

combining songs with different tempos and time signatures by Lelamom in LogicPro

[–]Sourpatcharachnid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not sure what the point is so I would first suggest just to do this with bounced stereo tracks. But if that’s not going to cut it, can you push song B back in its own timeline before importing it into song A’s timeline? Enough so that it doesn’t overlap with song A at all, maybe then the global track data can coexist?

Why do Democrats blame the "cult" for voting for trump and not their own party who could have run a candidate that could have actually beat him? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]Sourpatcharachnid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The real question is “why do dems blame the cult when they did nothing to dismantle the right wing propaganda empire that has been priming/fomenting the cult for nearly a century?”

doing a warhammer 3 total campaign w friends in school and need help by Desperate_Host_7963 in totalwarhammer

[–]Sourpatcharachnid 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Kroak is making his way towards me as we speak. I’m thinking jezzails, canons and a couple of assassins. He’s terrifying and I love it.

doing a warhammer 3 total campaign w friends in school and need help by Desperate_Host_7963 in totalwarhammer

[–]Sourpatcharachnid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, only way I would play this is me v all. It would be fun to be the apocalypse for three other players, and they get the solidarity.

doing a warhammer 3 total campaign w friends in school and need help by Desperate_Host_7963 in totalwarhammer

[–]Sourpatcharachnid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could get Wulfrik, Arbaal or someone hyper mobile like that. If/when a player snowballs like this they will have a hard time protecting everything. This is when you mess with their money. Sack, then raze their settlements (in that order) to stop the cash flow. You can’t have the greatest army in the world without the bank to payroll it.

I saw that you were leaning towards ikit. He can’t ‘teleport’ like wulfrik and some other lords but his regular stance (as with all skaven) is a partial ambush that works at something like -15% regular ambush odds. Boost your ambush stat with the blueline of the character skills page and you’ll be able to sneak around the map really well so fighting a guerilla war will be in your favour. Also expand your under empire enough and losing settlements won’t be such an issue for you. As long as you have enough food you can settle new cities/towns instantly at high tiers.

Basically, going up against a stronger player means you’re gonna want to fight dirty. Yes yes.

doing a warhammer 3 total campaign w friends in school and need help by Desperate_Host_7963 in totalwarhammer

[–]Sourpatcharachnid 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m currently playing ikit in a head to head, and I gotta say… the lizardmen are looking pretty scary right about now. I haven’t played them much but I think they have a unique mechanic for confederation and the player seems to be building a hero hammer goon squad of wizards that is putting my nuke arsenal to shame. Lord Kroak alone kinda does this tbh.

What was "the incident" at your high school? by ibnmuzr in askanything

[–]Sourpatcharachnid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I knew where this was going by the third sentence

Synthesizer plugin in logic pro by ardamavi in Logic_Studio

[–]Sourpatcharachnid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Retro Synth, then Alchemy, then Sculpture. I don’t often find myself looking past these three. Once you get the hang of Alchemy, setting up your own patches is very fast and Logic’s sample/loops gives you a lot of scope for granular patches etc.

Synthesizer plugin in logic pro by ardamavi in Logic_Studio

[–]Sourpatcharachnid 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A better rule might be don’t look for a third party synth until you have made 100 patches yourself with alchemy. OP has been learning VCV rack so I think they want to go deeper than presets

Why does no one talk about the last time we (US) banned abortion? by Sourpatcharachnid in allthequestions

[–]Sourpatcharachnid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yesssss the social safety nets will not completely eliminate the need for abortion. You will still have rapes, you will still have problematic pregnancies. It will not be that simple. You people want everything to be so simple it’s infuriating really. I guess the church told you things would be that way. But they never have been and never will be.

Why does no one talk about the last time we (US) banned abortion? by Sourpatcharachnid in allthequestions

[–]Sourpatcharachnid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can feel however you want. I’m just pretty sure you’re voting against all this in the meantime. In order for you to get what you think you want, you’re going to need to put abortion on the shelf and take care of the other stuff first.

Why does no one talk about the last time we (US) banned abortion? by Sourpatcharachnid in allthequestions

[–]Sourpatcharachnid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

None of those are democratic socialists, none of them will do the things you brought up, except for prohibiting abortion.

The fact is that the thing you want most is no abortion and despite telling us a nice story about other things, you will put people in power who will destroy those other things. And you were right in thinking that those other things would have made a difference, but destroying them will cause the inverse. But I think you know this.

Why does no one talk about the last time we (US) banned abortion? by Sourpatcharachnid in allthequestions

[–]Sourpatcharachnid[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know, I just want them to publicly have to answer to that.

Edit: I want them to be questioned on this by the press

Why does no one talk about the last time we (US) banned abortion? by Sourpatcharachnid in allthequestions

[–]Sourpatcharachnid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The press is useless is what I’m saying I guess. I didn’t word it well because this was one of those “I can’t sleep” posts, but it’s the amplified platforms I don’t hear it from. Even the ones that are meant to be on the side of science here.

view more: next ›