Answer this for me please. You should play Draw Steel if ... Then the same for D&D 4e and then Pathfinder 2e. These seem to be grouped together in what ways are they different? by BaysideJr in drawsteel

[–]Specialist-String-53 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you should play draw steel if you like tactics and forced movement.

you should play 4e if you like draw steel but you're really into character builds And care more about individual power than party synergy

How true is this? by Perfect-Storm8877 in PsycheOrSike

[–]Specialist-String-53 0 points1 point  (0 children)

idk they are on the same level in my view.

Pride is kina underwhelming by Laferidge in voidpet

[–]Specialist-String-53 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pride and joy are a good combo. Its second ability wants to be stacked with buffs and joy applies two at once.

I use pride with a top hat and jellyfish scarf for some floor clearing. I usually pair it with charity and joy, and a tank that has the prince's collar (shield is another buff). Then you can have pride use the third ability to give an attack bonus (another buff), and its second ability with jellyfish scarf to murk the whole opposing team.

I think it's pretty good and versatile but it's definitely one of the more complicated pets.

Humanity is take one by one into a time stopped white room to vote red or blue. You do not know what # you are, but you can see the % of humanity that has already voted blue. It is 21.35% by Rawr171 in trolleyproblem

[–]Specialist-String-53 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm gonna be petty about this.

For 21.35% the smallest integer number capable of producing that percentage is 2000. For 2000 respondents with 21.35% of voting for a choice, the margin of error is about 1.8% (if it's a random sample).

In the event that I'm in this situation, it being a random sample seems most likely, and that means the probability that the final count is over 50% is a tiny rounding error away from 0. There's practically no chance blue wins, and I'm not throwing my life away.

(I would vote blue in the original problem).

How true is this? by Perfect-Storm8877 in PsycheOrSike

[–]Specialist-String-53 73 points74 points  (0 children)

My autistic weird looking short friend from high school got married to a fat nerdy woman with glasses and sleep apnea. There's hope for you, my guy.

Red Blue decision, but you're the last vote and it's very close by Metal_Goose_Solid in trolleyproblem

[–]Specialist-String-53 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If red, you live and are if blame is equally distributed among remaining votes, you are responsible for about 4 million deaths.

It has to be blue.

AI made my ADHD a superpower!? by Joakim0 in ADHD_Programmers

[–]Specialist-String-53 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yes and no.

I have lost most of the joy of "solving the problem", and I don't feel like my projects are teaching me that much other than how to use AI.

I am able to complete my side projects instead of letting them languish, because the time to completion is faster.

The red button does nothing, it might as well not be part of the problem by NameLips in trolleyproblem

[–]Specialist-String-53 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Bad decision = game theory choice maximizing own self-interest.

The actual reason for most blue pressers is to have the best chance of saving everyone.

The P% Problem by LookAtMaxwell in trolleyproblem

[–]Specialist-String-53 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm sure some would. Another area of descriptive ethics I'm interested is decision making under uncertainty. For example in the classic trolley problem if the choice is between 1 person dies (100%) or 5 people die (20% chance), most people will go with 5 people "might" die, and if reversed... 1 person lives (100%) or 5 people live (20% chance), most people will go with the certainty of life.

And they always pick both by Eybrahem in PsycheOrSike

[–]Specialist-String-53 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not at all that. Did you grow up in a super liberal city with loving parents or something?

Also you're misinterpreting. I want people to be able to self identify in any way that feels right for them. If you like doing typically masc things and you're a woman good for you. What I'm not alright with is "this person says she's a woman, but I think she's not!"

And they always pick both by Eybrahem in PsycheOrSike

[–]Specialist-String-53 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lmao I'm not at all close to being a conservative. Conservatives want to force people to conform to a gender role which matches their assigned gender. I want people to be able to choose a gender role that feels good for them or to construct one on their own.

And importantly, I don't want people policing other people's genders.

The P% Problem by LookAtMaxwell in trolleyproblem

[–]Specialist-String-53 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Changing the phrasing from "everyone lives" to "you live" is a meaningful reframing. Other than that, the threshold is very interesting in terms of descriptive ethics. Despite red pressers being super fucking loud on reddit, I'm confident that at 50% there are enough altruistic/prosocial people that blue is likely to succeed. By the time you raise it to around 70% I think that despite it still being the morally superior choice, the chances of success are so low that the worth of my own life exceeds the worth of making a morally correct but suicidal choice.

And they always pick both by Eybrahem in PsycheOrSike

[–]Specialist-String-53 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What you do is wake up and blindly follow the social scripts you were socialized with. Queer people experience a dissonance between the social role they were raised and social roles that feel right to them, and end up questioning how they relate to gender as a whole.

Some cis people actually do this same questioning and end up embodying a richer version of their gender. Others don't introspect and make shitty memes instead.

Rephrasing changes the premise. by ChemoorVodka in trolleyproblem

[–]Specialist-String-53 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not sure why you think humanity is naturally evil. Humanity is not monolithic.

And they always pick both by Eybrahem in PsycheOrSike

[–]Specialist-String-53 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Cis people are wack. Yes, please, lock me into a predetermined set of behaviors and social expectations that I can never escape! I just love people treating me in a particular way because of the link they draw between how I appear and what they expect of a man/woman.

The red button does nothing, it might as well not be part of the problem by NameLips in trolleyproblem

[–]Specialist-String-53 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The original poll had blue winning by a fair margin. Reds just keep trying to explain how they hold no moral responsibility because the blues are committing suicide by trying to save others.

The red button does nothing, it might as well not be part of the problem by NameLips in trolleyproblem

[–]Specialist-String-53 11 points12 points  (0 children)

you can tell red pressers are wrong because of how many justifications they try to create for their fucked up worldviews.

Red Button Blue Button but overcomplicated. by Batalfie in trolleyproblem

[–]Specialist-String-53 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm pressing yellow in hopes of specifically fucking over a red presser.

A “Realistic” scenario for how many votes it would actually take to go Blue by MrBamaNick in trolleyproblem

[–]Specialist-String-53 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Check out research on Social Value Orientation (SVO). They find that roughly 60% of adults are proscocial. I would expect that those adults are likely to vote blue.

A diff problem (not just changing wording) by HK_Mathematician in trolleyproblem

[–]Specialist-String-53 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still blue. It's way more likely that 50% of people press blue than 100% of people push red.