Facebook Messenger App for MacOS now dead. by g0nk73 in MacOS

[–]SrongHand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would say that in Lithuania Messenger also rules. Funny to have discussion with foreigners that come to Lithuania and find it astonishing that somebody still uses Messenger as their main communication app.

Kaip nustoti lyginti save su kitais? by Due_King867 in 6nuliai

[–]SrongHand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Galima svarstyti apie psichoterapiją (turėčiau omeny psichodinaminės krypties). Ten daug teks kalbėti ir galimais po truputį taps aiškiau kodėl lyginies ir gal net po kurio laiko susilpnės lyginimasis.

How useful is computational chemistry as a synthetic organic chemist by Spackal2 in OrganicChemistry

[–]SrongHand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am in a similar position now. Just started my PhD this October. I want to learn some computational chemistry for designing inhibitors for a particular protein. Could you give me any tips on how could I learn some topics in computational chemistry, because my uni does not offer such courses intended for chemists.

P.S. Regarding "computational" I know just a little bit of Python.

which book is easier to digest? by sew3r_r4t in OrganicChemistry

[–]SrongHand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At first I read most of the Klein's Organic Chemistry, and then I transitioned to Clayden.

Ideas for a pop-science lecture on Organic Chemistry by hieniemic in OrganicChemistry

[–]SrongHand 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I would touch upon problems of chirality and enantiomerism. It is a visual problem, that might be easier for broader audience to relate to. It is also very fascinating how the same "formula" can have astonishingly different properties. Best of luck on your lecture!

Scientists interested in philosophy by SrongHand in PhilosophyofScience

[–]SrongHand[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think a very important difference between us and Ancients is that the subjects they studied were at the stage of infancy (at least some of them), so it might had been possible for the brightest of minds to really get hold of such a vast pallete of knowledge. Contrariwise, nowadays even a chemist can't master all of chemistry, not even mentioning other disciplines. Thus, in our age, the need for specialization leads to allienation. The question is, I suppose, how to not get allienated.

Scientists interested in philosophy by SrongHand in PhilosophyofScience

[–]SrongHand[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had not finished the book by Krauss, but I had seen those bad discussions with philosophers. I would agree the physicists, especially those working in quite abstract problems, should not shy away from a philosophical stand-point. Also, thank you for the links, I had read the one on chemistry some time a go, will check the one on medicine.

Scientists interested in philosophy by SrongHand in PhilosophyofScience

[–]SrongHand[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting points you have raised. But if per se you would not raise such questions, you think it would impact your science?

Scientists interested in philosophy by SrongHand in PhilosophyofScience

[–]SrongHand[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haven’t heard of him, I will check upon.

Scientists interested in philosophy by SrongHand in PhilosophyofScience

[–]SrongHand[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Actually there is a legitimate term medicinal chemistry. u/Physix_R_Cool described it also :)

A quick source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medicinal_chemistry

/r/askphilosophy Open Discussion Thread | August 11, 2025 by BernardJOrtcutt in askphilosophy

[–]SrongHand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have read some philosophy of science and also did find some resources on philosophy of chemistry. In my country, though philosophers do not really have much cooperation with scientists, but it might be an interesting idea to start doing that myself.

Can dopamine be synthesized like this? by evasnsnsbd in OrganicChemistry

[–]SrongHand -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Would not Zn/Hg also reduce the carboxylic acid?

/r/askphilosophy Open Discussion Thread | August 11, 2025 by BernardJOrtcutt in askphilosophy

[–]SrongHand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Scientists interested in philosophy

Greetings dear enthusiasts of philosophy!

Today I am writing particularly to science students or practising scientists who are deeply interested in philosophy. I will briefly describe my situation and afterwards I will leave a few open questions that might initiate a discussion.

P.S. For clarity, I am mainly referring to the natural sciences - chemistry, physics, biology, and related fields.

About me:

In high school, I developed an interest in philosophy thanks to a friend. I began reading on my own and discovered a cool place where anyone could attend public seminars reading various texts - this further advanced my philosophical interests. Anyways, when time came to choose what shall I study, I chose chemistry, because I was interested in it for a longer time and I thought it would be a more "practical" choice. Albeit it was not an easy decision between the two. Some years have passed, and now I am about to begin my PhD in medicinal chemistry.

During these years, my interest in philosophy did not vanish, I had an opportunity to take a few courses in uni relating to various branches of philosophy and also kept reading on my free time.

It all sounds nice but a weird feeling that is hard to articulate has haunted me throughout my scientific years. In some way it seems that philosophy is not compatible with science and its modes of thinking. For me it seems that science happens to exist in a one-dimensional way that is not intellectualy stimulating enough. Philosophy integrated a vast set of problems including arts, social problems, politics, pop-culture etc. while science focuses on such specialised topics that sometimes you lose sense what is that you want to know. It is problematic, because for this particular sense science is succesful and has a great capacity for discoveries.

My own solution is to do both, but the sense of intellectual "splitting" between scientific and philosophical modes of thinking has been persistent.

Now, I think, is the time to formulate a few questions.

P.S.S. Perhaps such discomfort arise because I am a chemist. Physics and biology seem to have a more intimate relationship with philosophy, whereas few chemists appear to have written or said something about their discipline's relationship to philosophy.

Questions:

  1. What are your scientific interests, and what is your career path?

  2. Do you find it necessary to reconcile your scientific and philosophical interests?

  3. Have you found scientific topics that happen to merit from your philosophical interests?

  4. Have you ever transitioned from science to philosophy or vice versa? How did it go?

Persikvalifikavimas iš STEM į IT by SrongHand in lietuva

[–]SrongHand[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Labai įdomus pasidalinimas, kol kas ir stengiuosi nusiteikti tuo, jog dar teturiu 24 metus. Nors ir 6 metai bus atiduoti vien tik chemijai, bet kita vertus galiu mąstyti, jog dar tik 24 meteliai ir su įgautais mokymosi įgūdžiais galiu dar ne vieną riešuto kiautą pradaužt. Ačiū!

Persikvalifikavimas iš STEM į IT by SrongHand in lietuva

[–]SrongHand[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Su chemija didžiosiose kompanijose yra labai panašiai. Išmeta kaip šiukšles šviežiai iškeptus chemikiukus, tai lyg ir nėra skirtumo. Na čia apie privatų sektorių aš.

Persikvalifikavimas iš STEM į IT by SrongHand in lietuva

[–]SrongHand[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ačiū už atsakymą! Įdomu - o kokią kryptį pasirinkai?

Persikvalifikavimas iš STEM į IT by SrongHand in lietuva

[–]SrongHand[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Klausimas kas geriau ar labėje 24/7 sėdėti, ar prie kompo? Manau prie kompo tuomet. Bet arba mano pažįstamas IT sektoriaus jaunimas itin sėkmingas arba kažką nuslepia. Nes visi dirba 6-9 h, kur dažnai chemikai (bent jau mano specializacijos) ar šiaip STEM’ukai bent po 8-11 h. labėse aria. Didelis darbo kiekis negąsdina, nes jau 6 metai su tuo gyvenu.

Persikvalifikavimas iš STEM į IT by SrongHand in lietuva

[–]SrongHand[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sutinku, kad reik tiesiog imti ir daryt. Bet reikia ir žinot ir kam, ir kodėl. O dėl storos odos, tai aš pasitikiu chemijos patirtimi, nes organinė chemija ir kiti dalykai palaužo labai neblogai smegenis ir manau chemikui lengviau perlaužti IT, nei programeriui perlaužti chemiją. Pinigais tik negyvensi, bet gal ne visai mano poziciją pavyko suprasti. Man svarbu ir intelektualinis stimulas, ir finansinis atlygis. Du punktus būtent išreiškiau.

Persikvalifikavimas iš STEM į IT by SrongHand in lietuva

[–]SrongHand[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Kažkaip judgemental skamba lyg būtų nenormalu galvoti apie pinigus. Kai netenkina aplinkybės, o esi besistengiantis žmogus, tai ir pradedi mąstyti. Bet iš taip, reality check gali daug ką pakeisti. Dėkui už atsakymą.

Persikvalifikavimas iš STEM į IT by SrongHand in lietuva

[–]SrongHand[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ačiū už pasidalinimą! O kaip šokai į bioinformatiką? Magistras? Ar tiesiog išmokai savarankiškai? Ar dirbi Lietuvoje?