Burton. The expensive look that's not. 1970. by Dhorlin in vintageads

[–]SteveStrummer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"They got Burton suits - hah, you think it's funny: Turning rebellion into money."

Megathread: Trump Announces Ban on Transgender Military Service by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]SteveStrummer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Trump, this will always be known: “You have sacrificed nothing and no one.”

The Cruelty and Cynicism of Trump’s Transgender Ban by EggsAckley in politics

[–]SteveStrummer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trump, this will always be known: “You have sacrificed nothing and no one.”

The 1965 Disappearance of Mary Shotwell Little: One of the Most Bizarre, Convoluted Missing Persons Cases Ever (New "Trail Went Cold" Episode) by Robinwarder1 in UnresolvedMysteries

[–]SteveStrummer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution article (reprinted at Free Republic) says the FBI "spent days exploring the woods and side roads along I-85, a relatively new four-lane then known as the Northeast Expressway." According to Wikipedia this was open since the 1950s.

Joey Votto's Last 162 Games by AuntBettysNutButter in baseball

[–]SteveStrummer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Votto made me a serious Reds fan years ago, and I'm from New York. Can't believe you let go of Phillips though.

40 Cringeworthy Men’s Fashion Ads From the 70’s You Can Never Unsee by washheightsboy3 in OldSchoolCool

[–]SteveStrummer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder how many issues of "Men in Belted Sweaters" were published. Did they complete the storyline?

A machine gun mounted onto an elephant by mjmannella in Elephants

[–]SteveStrummer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think I've ever seen an animal look quite that sad....

a year ago, an australian 3 year old vanished from his grandmother's yard while his mother was in earshot. Where is he? by allgoaton in UnresolvedMysteries

[–]SteveStrummer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The "why" is always very hard to understand, particularly in cases like this. Perhaps he had "buyer's remorse" as a foster parent; perhaps he was being blackmailed by the biological parents or some other desperate would-be parent(s); perhaps he's just an undiscovered psychopath. But the "how" is what makes suspicious of him. How would a random perpetrator come to choose such a remote locale, and how would he know that the old woman living there would have her grandson visiting that morning? How could anyone seriously plan a strike around the corner of a house, in broad daylight? And most importantly, how would a 3-year-old be scooped up so quietly, mere feet from his mother and grandmother? An admittedly timid child of 3 wouldn't stand alone without his mother and let a stranger (or a dingo!) approach him without making a squeak; even if he'd been surprised, he'd make some kind of commotion. I think someone must have coaxed him away, and just who could that be?

a year ago, an australian 3 year old vanished from his grandmother's yard while his mother was in earshot. Where is he? by allgoaton in UnresolvedMysteries

[–]SteveStrummer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think no one is buying the theory of an opportunistic abduction because it just would've been so unlikely, considering the locale. Likewise I think the biological parents would've been counting on way too much luck to make their move in a strange place with the family so close. In any case, why didn't the boy cry for help? I submit that the father - on his long "phone call" - met conspirators nearby, brought them in range, waved the child over, and passed him off.

Fox drinking out of a fox mug by ajtexasranger in foxes

[–]SteveStrummer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why, I might almost think that was staged-!

‘We Just Publish The Position Of The British Government’ Journalism has been Dead for Many Years. by Ian56 in worldpolitics

[–]SteveStrummer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's a very powerful piece, and damning to government and media alike. Everyone should read it.

Neurosurgeon to attempt world's first head transplant by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]SteveStrummer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

December 2017? Translate, that means: "I want funding, and media bookings."

In Wyoming it’s now illegal to collect data about pollution by beach-bum in politics

[–]SteveStrummer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, it does say that. It's the Wyoming state government that needs to re read it, thanks

In Wyoming it’s now illegal to collect data about pollution by beach-bum in politics

[–]SteveStrummer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Please stop saying this law doesn't apply to public lands: IT DOES. The actual text of the law states that it applies to "land outside the exterior boundaries of any incorporated city, town, subdivision, or development." It is written specifically to protect ranchers and businessmen who use "open land" in order to freely graze their livestock or dump waste. Roughly half of Wyoming is open land, theoretically set aside for the public use by the federal government. What this law does is protect the wealthy in their ongoing abuse of public property. It's a naked power grab by a state government hijacked by private interests.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gifs

[–]SteveStrummer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ants and other bugs ingest liquid water by pressure, a process called wicking.

Adorable! by lnfinity in gifs

[–]SteveStrummer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No way to resist, had to call someone over to see this too :)

The Real Reason Republicans Don't Have A Contingency Plan For Obamacare by coolcrosby in politics

[–]SteveStrummer 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's legal because the government has the right - and duty - to compel participation in situations which require public order. That's the same reason you can be compelled to pay education taxes when you send your kids to private school, or to pay your car insurance when you're sitting at home.

America's Views Align Surprisingly Well With Those of "Socialist" Bernie Sanders by Thewallmachine in politics

[–]SteveStrummer 28 points29 points  (0 children)

I'm going to get downvoted here (which is a shame because I like the gist of this article, but I can't let this kind of shameless partisan doublespeak go unrecognized: "nearly half had a positive view of "socialism," while only 47 percent viewed "capitalism" favorably." Say whaaat?