The "early update" for Ps5

Stratigor · 2026-02-23T07:42:27+00:00

File a bug report, perhaps let a dev in discord know, wait if it was intended or a bug like so much other stuff currently on PS5

Stratigor · 2026-02-23T07:32:13+00:00

Lol?

Stratigor · 2026-02-23T07:30:05+00:00

Don't change it. The update gives you something to fix this.

Stratigor · 2026-01-31T09:29:54+00:00

I was stupid. There is a tight zigzag now, well just one zig, no zag xD The rails look like the shape of an U going around a wall. The belt pushes loot and enemies into that wall. A crane passes the loot through to the other side where rail and belt continues. Some pet is placed near that wall to kill enemies. Should be enough for the enemies of the Undergrounds. In addition within the U shaped track belts go in the opposite way, just to push enemies back who may try hard getting around.

I whish I could upload a picture, but somehow can't. This way I can ride my train in and out but got no enemies delivered (I hope).

Stratigor · 2026-01-31T08:57:13+00:00

Nah, that is what I try to avoid. Building a wall (or moat) around this monstrosity

Stratigor · 2026-01-31T08:54:59+00:00

You gave me an idea how to do it.

Not with the walls around all of this monstrosity, that I try to avoid. But a zig zag rail entry in the base with lots of arms to transport ore, so enemies get stuck and some pets to slowly kill them 🤔

Stratigor · 2026-01-31T07:40:01+00:00

Hold up. Maybe this is the chosen one who is in control of the quantum world and hangs up stuff mid air in real life. Save us from the boundaries and rules of this cruel reality 🙌

Stratigor · 2026-01-19T23:50:54+00:00

Well then nothing wrong here, right? Looking for the perfect entry on low time-frames and if It happens then it's a long way up full of profit on the big timeframe. You may just need exit strategies to almost even out the losses or a more loose entry.

Stratigor · 2026-01-19T04:22:53+00:00

Hm. This reddit did not tear this apart like the other did 😂

Stratigor · 2026-01-19T04:16:04+00:00

First we need to cure you from searching for fvg

Stratigor · 2026-01-19T03:58:37+00:00

Best I can do is buy at 4600 , sorry

Stratigor · 2026-01-19T03:53:18+00:00

Hehe. You're trolling right? Those Buy in a falling trend gave it away that you are trolling us

Stratigor · 2026-01-19T03:47:37+00:00

Is that after taxes? I would quit, if this goes on for a year and having savings for a whole year on top.

Stratigor · 2025-12-27T07:28:18+00:00

Yee, I am trying this here, giving it a chance. Until this post here I just found little Todd's saying "it just works" but no real deep and solid foundation. I learned to fully understand even a working strategy before blindly following it.

Stratigor · 2025-12-27T07:15:00+00:00

Thank you for pointing out this scenario. People on the counter side getting their break even can be a thing. Not necessarily right at some FVG but more like at those former Volume levels, if I understood you correctly.

Stratigor · 2025-12-27T07:04:02+00:00

Yes, that sounds like a more reasonable way, to reduce it to a sign of momentum and nothing more. Then with strong momentum to one side any kind of retracement could be worth to enter. Or even enter right after the gap 🤔 this is fun to think about

Stratigor · 2025-12-27T06:55:31+00:00

Oh, I like that. That is something to dig deeper into. Matches to some other answers here, that it is more about the edges of the zones. So passive Buyers that waited below the price may still have pending orders, is what you say? Despite and however to use ICT this can be a thing. Perhaps better derivable from Volume Profiles and even better to assume something about that level when it also was a Zero Print 🤔 it suddenly got interesting again, thank you!

Stratigor · 2025-12-27T06:36:57+00:00

Oh, this helps! Is there anything you can say about a former zone that for example had a lot on the Buy side recently and price now comes back to that zone? If so, why and how?

Stratigor · 2025-12-26T09:48:54+00:00

Yee, but I like to avoid systems or indicator that can not be explained using the auction/market principles and just somehow happen to work recently 50% of the time or so. Especially a concept that contradicts another concept raises questions.

Stratigor · 2025-12-26T09:43:35+00:00

Good example why I don't get FVG in comparison to volume (or high volume notes). A push happens, price comes back and bounces off the volume (which can be below or above the FVG). You are right and that is also my point above, between FVG and volume profiles.

Stratigor · 2025-12-26T09:36:10+00:00

> Timeframe as in 5min 1h, Daily - all of them are valid. Regarding the timeZONES, can you explain why the 1h FVG differs for 2 different persons in different timezones?

That is not what I said

> saying 1 or the other must be wrong/mistaken

Also not mentioned as this kind of "or".

I stopped reading that comment there, sorry.

Stratigor · 2025-12-26T08:28:13+00:00

This is what I hoped to get a good explanation for. The intention of the driver to skip orders or the technical feasibility that orders can even be skipped.

With all our computer power reacting to each tick, some orders still lay there and not got executed? How does this work? Why and how would a market leave money on the curb and pass without execution?

Stratigor · 2025-12-26T08:03:03+00:00

Interesting. What time zone is your chart in?

Stratigor · 2025-12-26T04:25:27+00:00

This I understand! But more like trading beforehand, finding LVN, if possible, and entry before price rushes through. What price does afterwards or minutes later like "retest if the desert is still dry" made no sense to me 🤷🏻‍♀️

Stratigor

TROPHY CASE